Skip to main content

Checking In...

Last night the Nuggets won the Northwest Division with a 110-98 win over the Portland Trailblazers.

The article calls it the Nuggets’ first division title in eighteen years, which is just ridiculous. Anyway, I’m thrilled, so we’re going back to the Hole Punch Vault to see what went right and what didn’t this season.

First things first. I did say the Nuggets would win the division title, and I’m pointing that out because my recent predictions that the Broncos and University of Connecticut’s mens basketball team would win championships have whittled down my readership. (I also predicted a record of 54-28. That seems unlikely, as the Nuggets would not only have to win out, but also win half a dozen games they’ve already lost.)

What went right: Frontcourt depth. Nene injured his knee in the first game and was lost for the season and Kenyon Martin has been in and out of the lineup. And Ed Najera is gone now. But the Nuggets pieced together a decent inside corps thanks to a surprisingly more consistent Francisco Elson, an amazing start by Marcus Camby, and, of course, Carmelo’s maturation.

What went wrong: Earl Watson. I thought we signed him because we actually wanted him, but it turned out he really was just trade bait like everyone else said. I guess this actually went right because we did trade him.

What went right: Carmelo. My prediction (ahem):

I think Carmelo will have a fantastic season and score in the mid-twenties per game, in addition to regaining his rookie year late-game mojo. He won't be a stopper defensively, nor will we ask him to be, but expect him to play hard enough to earn big minutes.
Carmelo did indeed raise his scoring average to a current 26.8 per game. Even more impressively, he’s continued the efficiency he showcased at the end of last season with career-highs in field goal (48.2%) and free-throw (80.7%) shooting. And if you’ve watched a Nuggets game lately, you’ve surely heard that his late-game shooting percentages are among the league’s best (actually, I think they’ve said he is the league’s best), placing him in stark contrast to classmate LeBron James. Carmelo probably deserves cursory MVP consideration, if only because of how the offense stagnates when he’s on the bench. And he’s averaging 37 minutes per game.

What went wrong: Outside shooting. We’re dead-last in three-point percentage.

What went right: The trade that brought us Ruben Patterson and Reggie Evans.

I gave us the slight edge when it happened, but Kiki deserves serious props because it turned out to provide a major boost. It didn’t get the publicity, but forget what you’ve heard-it worked out fifty times better than when the Broncos signed all those Cleveland Browns.

Outlook: Maybe the biggest factor in the division title, of course, was the rest of our pathetic division, from which we will likely be the only playoff team. This puts us in an interesting playoff position. As a division winner, we’re automatically a top-three seed (we’ll be No. 3), but have a chance to finish with a worse record than the sixth seed, meaning we wouldn’t even have homecourt advantage in the first round.

Anyway, the sixth seed will probably be the Memphis Grizzlies or Los Angeles Clippers. Statistically, both look to have a little bit of an edge on us. But I think the Nuggets’ situation is somewhat analogous to that of the Pittsburgh Steelers this year-because of injuries and, in our case, trades, the team is better than its numbers and record would indicate.

We can beat either team. We’d even have an outside shot against the Suns in the second round. Either way, while the Nuggets may not look like they’ve made the huge leap I’d predicted, they continue to become one of the league’s elite teams.

Comments

David said…
i don't have much to say on this, other than it was a fantastic read and i endorse your position on the nuggets.

that's why i come here.

and for the liberal beratement, albeit employed ardently.

Popular posts from this blog

Orange Julius

All right, class, what kind of things do we look for in an NBA draftee? A player who's proven, or one with oodles of upside? A guy coming off a spectacular college career, or one coming off the bench for his Serbian club team? A player who's shown constant improvement, or one who mysteriously fared worse as a senior than a junior? No, Kiki, put your hand down, it's the first answer to each of these questions, not the second. Yesterday the Nuggets picked 20th in the first round, selecting Julius Hodge, shooting guard/small forward, out of North Carolina State. College fans will immediately recognize his name, as Hodge was the ACC Player of the Year as a junior. Unfortunately, he just finished his senior year, which was marked mostly by a dip in his scoring numbers (he developed a sudden inability to hit free throws or threes) and a punch to the groin by Wake Forest guard Chris Paul. Hodge is mostly a mid-range and slashing-type scorer, kind of like the more-than-sufficient s...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...