Skip to main content

2006 Broncos schedule

You’ve probably heard already, but the NFL schedules for next season are out. I don’t much care about anyone but the Broncos.

I like Denver’s schedule quite a bit. We’ll have played the Pittsburgh Steelers and New England Patriots on the road by our eighth game of the season. We’re also hosting the Indianapolis Colts and Seattle Seahawks. If you had to pick four teams to excel next regular season, those might be the exact four. The Seahawks game is the latest of these (Dec. 3) or, in other words, each of these games comes too early for opponents to be resting anyone.

Two reasons I’m a fan of the schedule: first, I think tough early-season competition should be a good thing. Unlike recent seasons, we’ll have a better handle on how good the Broncos really are heading into the playoffs. It'll make the regular season more compelling. And second, now that they know the season will not be a cakewalk, Broncos management will stop cutting popular and productive players like Mike Anderson and Trevor Pryce and maybe consider putting that salary cap room towards a football player or two.

One thing bugs me, though this news didn’t break today-we’re playing the Chiefs in Kansas City on Thanksgiving, and the game will be broadcast nationally only on the NFL Network. Not a big deal for fans who live in Colorado-the game will be shown on a local channel as well-but it kind of sucks for Broncos lovers who are out of state, such as for my example my two readers. Unless, I guess, you guys already get the NFL Network. I run a sports blog in my uh, free time, but even I think watching the NFL Network makes you a little weird.

We’re also playing the Ravens Monday, Oct. 9, which I guess means the league’s given up on having attractive Monday night matchups.

Comments

David said…
i do get the nfl network, but that's because i'm living the law of consecration up in here with 5 other sports minded bachelors.

when i'm a grad student, i have a hunch i won't be able splurging on things like the nfl network... just a hunch.

looks like i'll have to befriend an avid nfl fan out there with a penchant for crappy cable programming

two readers
how i long for the days of alex sudreth. that guy was a gong show. total glutton for punishment. and such a willing target. those truly were the glory days. sing it boss...
2:05 PM
Mike said…
I don't know, Alex might not be as fun now that I'd feel more guilty being so racist towards him...

The other interesting aspect of the schedule is that there's a bit of flexibility in it-supposedly NBC may be able to trade a bad Sunday night matchup for a better game earlier that day (they'd change the start times of the game rather than have NBC air at the same time as Fox and CBS). I'm not sure it's the greatest idea, but I guess I want to see how it goes before I make up my mind.
2:37 PM
Mike said…
I was thinking the same thing about moving games to the NFL Network. What does it serve? I don't see the league making more money off people subscribing to its network than it would have having people actually watch its games, but then they know the actual numbers a little better than I do.

I love football, but I think I'd like it a lot less if I had a channel solely dedicated to it. Especially one so obsessed with reruns.
2:13 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...
5 comments
Read more

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...
9 comments
Read more

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...
12 comments
Read more