Skip to main content

2006 Broncos schedule

You’ve probably heard already, but the NFL schedules for next season are out. I don’t much care about anyone but the Broncos.

I like Denver’s schedule quite a bit. We’ll have played the Pittsburgh Steelers and New England Patriots on the road by our eighth game of the season. We’re also hosting the Indianapolis Colts and Seattle Seahawks. If you had to pick four teams to excel next regular season, those might be the exact four. The Seahawks game is the latest of these (Dec. 3) or, in other words, each of these games comes too early for opponents to be resting anyone.

Two reasons I’m a fan of the schedule: first, I think tough early-season competition should be a good thing. Unlike recent seasons, we’ll have a better handle on how good the Broncos really are heading into the playoffs. It'll make the regular season more compelling. And second, now that they know the season will not be a cakewalk, Broncos management will stop cutting popular and productive players like Mike Anderson and Trevor Pryce and maybe consider putting that salary cap room towards a football player or two.

One thing bugs me, though this news didn’t break today-we’re playing the Chiefs in Kansas City on Thanksgiving, and the game will be broadcast nationally only on the NFL Network. Not a big deal for fans who live in Colorado-the game will be shown on a local channel as well-but it kind of sucks for Broncos lovers who are out of state, such as for my example my two readers. Unless, I guess, you guys already get the NFL Network. I run a sports blog in my uh, free time, but even I think watching the NFL Network makes you a little weird.

We’re also playing the Ravens Monday, Oct. 9, which I guess means the league’s given up on having attractive Monday night matchups.

Comments

David said…
i do get the nfl network, but that's because i'm living the law of consecration up in here with 5 other sports minded bachelors.

when i'm a grad student, i have a hunch i won't be able splurging on things like the nfl network... just a hunch.

looks like i'll have to befriend an avid nfl fan out there with a penchant for crappy cable programming

two readers
how i long for the days of alex sudreth. that guy was a gong show. total glutton for punishment. and such a willing target. those truly were the glory days. sing it boss...
Mike said…
I don't know, Alex might not be as fun now that I'd feel more guilty being so racist towards him...

The other interesting aspect of the schedule is that there's a bit of flexibility in it-supposedly NBC may be able to trade a bad Sunday night matchup for a better game earlier that day (they'd change the start times of the game rather than have NBC air at the same time as Fox and CBS). I'm not sure it's the greatest idea, but I guess I want to see how it goes before I make up my mind.
Mike said…
I was thinking the same thing about moving games to the NFL Network. What does it serve? I don't see the league making more money off people subscribing to its network than it would have having people actually watch its games, but then they know the actual numbers a little better than I do.

I love football, but I think I'd like it a lot less if I had a channel solely dedicated to it. Especially one so obsessed with reruns.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...