Skip to main content

Nuggets suspend K-Mart

If you couldn’t decode that cryptic title, the Nuggets have suspended power forward Kenyon Martin indefinitely.

The aforelinked Denver Post article points out that Martin refused to play in the second half of Game 2 after playing limited minutes in the first half. The Nuggets didn’t give an official reason for the suspension, but we’re all grown-ups here, and the two are obviously related. From the article:
"He just doesn't practice very often," Karl said. "He just wants to play in the games. That, philosophically, just doesn't make any sense to me. I (still) think he has a big-time heart and I think he's a big-time competitor."

Karl tries to cushion the blow at the end, but he makes a pretty good point. Either you can play or you can’t, and it's obvious Martin is limited right now.

While it’s no secret I’m not a fan of Martin or his ridiculous cap-crushing contract, I can’t help but think how much better things would be for him if his name was Ben Wallace. But until you win Defensive Player of the Year, apparently, you can’t determine your own substitution patterns. You still have to listen to the coach before that. Injury or not, taking yourself out for the game seems like a pretty selfish thing to do in the playoffs. But who cares what I think?
In the wake of Martin's actions, two prominent Nuggets players, who agreed to talk on the condition of anonymity, said they had lost faith in the power forward as a teammate.

Even more telling was the reaction of Ruben Patterson, though it’s not surprising he’s nuts enough to go on the record:
"He ain't hurt or nothing," Patterson said. "He just wanted to be in the game. ... He was very angry."

I have mixed feelings. There are way too many scapegoats in the world, and it’s gotta be tough to be in Martin’s shoes right now. But the fact is at least three of his teammates told reporters they’re not completely buying his injury excuse. Even if they don’t realize how hurt he is, that’s a bad situation.

Will the Nuggets move Martin in the offseason? I don’t know or care yet. But the intensity of the team’s reaction tells me the Nuggets will be fired up for Game 3 at home tomorrow night (8:30 Mountain, TNT). I know I am. You?

Comments

Mike said…
That's a pretty good point. But I think homecourt could be really big for us.

Amen. I'd sort of forgotten about the 'Zo thing, but I remember how much it bothered me when it happened. That was jacked. Besides, Mourning has always seemed like ten times the warrior/tough guy Martin is. Not to mention fifty times the player.
David said…
i like k-mart.

the store.

Popular posts from this blog

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...