Skip to main content

NBA MVP

Unlike last year, Steve Nash is a legitimate MVP candidate. However, before I fall back into Canada-bashing, let me say the most annoying trend by Nash supporters is how he’s given credit for every improvement his teammates make. It’s ridiculous.

Phoenix has the third-best record in the West this year despite missing Amare Stoudemire for pretty much the whole season, and Nash has raised his game. But so has Shawn Marion, who actually plays defense, too, and it’s tough to separate the two of them.

In fact, that seems to be a theme this year: many traditional MVP candidates are sharing the spotlight with a teammate good enough that it’s tough to tell who’s had the better season. Tim Duncan is peerless and showed tremendous heart playing through injuries this season. But Tony Parker actually leads the Spurs in scoring by a slim margin and is among the league leaders in shooting percentage. Chauncey Billups is statistically almost neck-and-neck with Nash, but the Pistons have a deep, quality lineup that will always work against them in the races for individual honors. And Dwyane Wade, who I wussed out of calling the MVP last year, always has Shaq to fall back on, though O’Neal has missed a lot of games this year.

Conversely, a number of players had standout seasons as their team’s big star, like Carmelo Anthony, LeBron James, Dirk Nowitzki and of course Kobe Bryant. All of the players listed have at least decent MVP arguments. However, I see this as a three-man race. In descending order:

3. Dwyane Wade. Shaq has been in and out of the lineup all year, and only recently has Shaq found his legs. Meanwhile, Wade has been a rock for the Heat and remained their go-to guy in crunch time. He’s versatile: 27.2 points, 5.7 rebounds, 6.7 assists, and 1.95 steals per game. Wade shoots 49.5 percent from the floor, which is awesome for a high-scoring perimeter player. (By comparison, Kobe shoots just under forty-five percent.) The only real knock against Wade is that Miami has struggled against other elite teams, but that’s hardly his fault alone.

2. Dirk Nowitzki. No one enjoys bashing Dirk for being soft more than I do. He’s put up typical Dirk numbers and continues to shoot better than men half his size. My favorite stat? He’s shooting 90.1% from the foul line. That’s impressive for a seven-footer, though maybe it shouldn’t be since he’s closer to the basket than guards are.

Dirk’s still not quite a stopper on defense and doesn’t have Wade’s diverse skills. So why do I have him ahead? For starters, he’s played in 81 games this year to Wade’s 75. He’s been hotter down the stretch. And despite injuries and inconsistency throughout the Dallas lineup, Dirk’s team has won more games: 60 to the Heat’s 52.

1. LeBron James. Considering predictions before the draft, it’s surprising that LeBron is almost overlooked sometimes next to classmates Wade and Carmelo. But James has lived up to almost every drop of hype. Cleveland wins fifty games for the year if they can sneak past the mighty Hawks tonight, even though James’ best teammates are soft-shoed middlemen Drew Gooden and Zydrunas Ilgauskas.

LeBron does almost everything for the Cavaliers: he scores, he rebounds, he passes, and he leads. At just 21, his all-around numbers are already taken for granted. But I think LeBron has done the most with the least.

So I’m giving the edge to LeBron, though maybe I should be looking in Dirk’s direction. What do you think?

Comments

Mike said…
Dirk is a bad defender, but LeBron and Dwyane don't do much on that end except gamble for steals. He grabs nine boards a game, and while I think a 7-footer with his minutes can get more, it is 16th in the league, so he doesn't completely lack production on the boards.

I'm just impressed with Dallas' success in the face of such poor continuity: almost all of their players have missed a lot of games this year. Seriously, check it out. (Besides, why knock Dallas now, when there will be so many opportunities to do so in the playoffs?)
David said…
is dirk really 7 foot? i thought he was always 6'10" or something.

let me check my facts. ok you are right. what is amazing is that he certainly doesn't play like a seven footer.

my embarrassing confession. i've watched more nba games live than i have on tv this year. 1 - live.
David said…
oh, and cheers on the "link"

now all three of us can get to my blog from yours.

; )
Mike said…
Word up, Pugs. Now that I switched to a template that has links-that boathouse was getting on my nerves-I couldn't very well leave you hanging any longer. (It would have been SO HARD to add them in...I'm lazy, what can I say.)

Dirk's interesting, because he doesn't play like you'd expect from how he looks. If he was 6-7 with his skills, he'd still score in the twenties, but no one would think he was soft. Slow, yeah, but not soft, because he'd be "guarding" perimeter players. It's fair to expect more from a big guy, but Nowitzki's better than some give him credit for.

He was the only rock on a 60-win team and I still went with LeBron, so don't think I love Dirk's game, either.

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...