Skip to main content

Nuggets back in action!

All right, I've lived off the non-glory of the Broncos' loss long enough, it's time to update this website and move on to the Nuggets.

We/I at Hole Punch move on with a heavy heart, because it feels like the Finals ended about a month ago, and sometimes it seems like the NBA is all I ever talk about here. (And in the middle of football season!)

Anyway, the Denver Nuggets open their season tonight in San Antonio (8 p.m. Eastern on TNT) against the defending champion Spurs, which is to say, we're looking at starting the season off at 0-1, especially with coach George Karl out for the first two games.

The question this year is, what will the carryover be for the George Karl effect? Returning primarily the same roster that finished last season with a flourish, the Nuggets look to build on the momentum and contend in the West this year.

A few key points, and a bunch of questions:

Strengths: The Nuggets are strong in the same areas they've been for the last two playoff seasons: namely, unusual frontcourt depth and the ability, when the spirit moves them, to run anyone out of the building.

Marcus Camby and Kenyon Martin anchor a solid-rebounding and plus-defensive effort, and off the bench Nene nee Hilario is one of the league's best big-man reserves. And you might have heard of the other forward, Carmelo Anthony.

An already-potent point guard corps of Andre Miller and the Earl of Boykins was strengthened with the somewhat-curious addition of the Earl of Watson, late of the Memphis Grizzlies. At least it looks curious, considering Miller is a solid starter and Boykins is worthy off big minutes in reserve.

But late last season, Karl often played Miller and Boykins together to spark the offense. The acquisition of Watson is a good sign the Nuggets plan to play two point guards often this season and shows a commitment to the up-tempo game.

Weaknesses: The most glaring weakness last season was the complete lack of outside shooting following the loss of Voshon Lenard to a torn Achilles tendon. Indeed, you could say outside shooting was our Achilles' heel last year, but that's just lame. Anyway, the late-season pickup of Wesley Person mitigated that loss somewhat.

Lenard returns to the lineup this year (Person is gone), but will remain one of the last options in the offense. Will he be remembered in the half-court?

The Nuggets can put up points in bunches when they run, but when games slow down, they occasionally have a tough time scoring. But they'll be better this year than last, thanks to the return of Lenard and the continued development of Carmelo Anthony.

The other question (and it may seem odd given the Nuggets' aforementioned frontcourt depth): can the Nuggets rebound effectively against elite teams? The Spurs beat on us the boards by about five per game in last year's playoff series. And defensive rebounding is the key to a running offense.

Carmelo: Can Carmelo start the season with a bang, or will he play his way into shape like he has the past two seasons? Word on the street is that Anthony is ready to rumble this time around; but I recall hearing that last year, too.

Carmelo remains the key for the franchise, which is unsurprising considering how little the roster has changed. He's a fantastic finisher on the break as well as our best low-post and midrange offensive option. Will he continue to give an honest effort defensively? Can he be counted on in clutch situations? Has his jumper improved any? And will he continue to develop into a tougher rebounder, without jeopardizing his open court opportunities?

I think Carmelo will have a fantastic season and score in the mid-twenties per game, in addition to regaining his rookie year late-game mojo. He won't be a stopper defensively, nor will we ask him to be, but expect him to play hard enough to earn big minutes.

The Division: As I mentioned in an earlier post, Sports Illustrated predicts the Nuggets to finish with the No. 2 seed in the West and a division crown. While that seeding looks really high to a longtime Nuggets fan such as myself, the division win is very realistic-which would make us top three in any event.

Our competition in the Northwest is Portland, Minnesota, Utah, and Seattle. Seattle's good, Utah's dangerous when healthy, and I think Minnesota could bounce back from last season, if they can get any kind of decent point guard play out of Troy Hudson and Marko Jaric (okay, maybe I don't think they can bounce back).

In other words, we're in a sort-of deep division, but we ought to win it anyway (not unlike the Broncos in the AFC West).

The Coach: George Karl turned last season around; can he keep it rolling? He demands a lot from his players, which usually ends in them tuning him out for an underachieving finish to his tenure, but he's still early in his stay here. While I didn't think he was much of a pickup back in the day, he proved to be more than worth it. There are better coaches in the league (Phil Jackson, Larry Brown, and Gregg Popovich are all definitely a cut above), but he's as good as anyone in the division (I can't stand Jerry Sloan.)

The Outlook: To my own surprise and after a little research, I pretty much have to go with Sports Illustrated here. Barring major injury, the Nuggets will win the division. I'll say 54-28, and wouldn't that be great! I don't know what seed that will give us, but who really cares?

What do you think?

Comments

David said…
just on sheer supposition that "what can go wrong will."

camby, an injury torn vet.
kenyon, a fiery fiend
mello, the third year embryotic ego

one of them gets hurt seriously this year. I say we finish fourth in the conference.

i just want to be wrong, so the nugs can have a great season. one of the best teams to watch, and the best damn uniform color scheme in the bigs.
Mike said…
Yeah, who knows how we'll fare come playoff time? Assuming playoff time comes, which it surely should, but I can't take anything for granted with the Nuggets yet.

And Pugs is right, a million things can go wrong. Which I guess is why No. 2 sounded so high to me. But with Amare hurt, Dallas and Sacramento being exactly the same as always, and Houston's odd mix of Yao and T-Mac, all the other non-Spurs West contenders have big question marks this year, too.
David said…
brothers gore,

i guess the mile high sports enthusiast that I am... finds it more soothing to prepare as if bad things only happen to my team.

that when, when they do, i knew it was coming. and when it happens to other teams i rejoice

schauden freude
David said…
i was right.

down goes nene...

although i always question his real value to the team. we should've traded him when we had the chance.

what i wouldn't do for a danny schayes these days
Mike said…
I knew I'd overrated them, man.

I am glad to see Pugs shares my love for the Nugs' unis.

I am definitely a pessimist (as if all o' y'all hadn't noticed).

Forget Danny. I'd take Dolph Schayes at this point.

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...