Skip to main content

Eastern Conference first-round preview

I don’t know if the East is truly weaker than the West-Detroit is as legit a title contender as anyone-but it’s certainly thinner. So the first-round matchups are pretty lame. I’m not getting paid by the word here, but I’ll prove it to you:

(1) Detroit Pistons vs. (8) Milwaukee Bucks. The Pistons are the clear favorite in the East, which they will win. The Bucks, meanwhile, didn’t even have a winning season (40-42). We can talk about matchups, or I can just tell you: Sweep, Detroit.

(2) Miami Heat vs. (7) Chicago Bulls. Miami has struggled against elite teams; fortunately for them, Chicago is not in that category. This is getting ridiculous. I’ll give Chicago a game; Heat 4-1.

(3) New Jersey Nets vs. (6) Indiana Pacers. Say what you want about T.O., because I’ve said plenty, but I find him much easier to root for than Vince Carter. While Owens is selfish and impossible to reason with, at least he always plays his heart out, even on those rare occasions when he feels underpaid. Carter, on the other hand, tanked it to get traded even with a maxed-out and fully-guaranteed contract.

Indiana has been ground zero for turmoil the last few years, thanks to Ron Artest, who was finally traded. His replacement, Peja Stojakovic, was in top form, replacing all of the scoring and none of the defense.

Talent-wise, I may give Indiana the edge, especially since New Jersey has no bench. But the Pacers, like Dallas, have been shuffling lineups all season long. So I’ll give New Jersey the edge on their consistency, but I think the Pacers could take at least six games to bow out.

(Can someone remind me again why the league switched to a best-of-seven first round a few years back? Oh, right, the league finally had a chance to do the Lakers a favor. Might have been a good idea at the time, but now we have to watch teams like these two duke it out for a month and a half just to find out which will lose to Miami. Oh, joy. Remember, class: just because a series is close doesn’t mean it’s good.)

(4) Cleveland Cavaliers vs. (5) Washington Wizards. Now this might actually be an interesting series. We’ve got the playoff debut of HPS NBA MVP LeBron James, which ought to be exciting. Forget what you’ve heard about Steve Nash: James makes some of the most exciting passes I’ve ever seen.

Washington is spearheaded by a trio of Gilbert Arenas, Antawn Jamison, and Caron Butler. I thought Caron was worthy of a much higher pick a few years ago, and I’m glad his hard work has vindicated me in retrospect. It’s also instructive that each of these starring players were very productive in major college programs; perhaps the draft isn’t as risky as we think.

Also, and I hesitate to bring this up, but it’s pretty clear the Nuggets made a huge blunder when they went with Andre Miller instead of Gilbert Arenas a few years back. Arenas averaged 29.3 points per game this year; Miller scored that many points in any single game just once.

So I’m hesitant to slam Kiki now, because the move made sense to me at the time considering the money Arenas wanted. Then again, I wasn’t employed by the NBA and hadn’t seen Arenas play much. This, to me, underscores that Vandeweghe has done an average job at best. Compared to past Denver GMs, that makes him look like a genius, but he hasn’t made very many moves that turned out right. Actually, that’s unfair-the Antonio McDyess for Marcus Camby and Nene move was an absolute heist. Then again, if you can’t beat the Knicks in a trade, then….well, there’s no way to finish that statement, because the Knicks never get the better of anyone.

Anyway, we can talk about the Nuggets in tomorrow’s post. Point is, this should be a really exciting series, hopefully with no defense whatsoever. Cavs in seven.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...