Skip to main content

NFC Championship: Carolina at Seattle

Fabulous. Most years at least one conference championship winner is blatantly obvious, but as soon as I start trying to predict winners with the whole world as my witness, I honestly think that both games could go either way.

I feel that way especially about Sunday’s NFC Championship game, featuring the Carolina Panthers at the Seattle Seahawks (4:30 Mountain, FOX). Depending on how you look at it, both teams look better than their opponents.

You think momentum is critical? The Panthers won by a smaller margin last week than Seattle, yet were more in control of their game against a better team and on the road. Despite surrendering 21 points to Chicago's pathetic offense, Carolina basically kept the Bears at arm’s length and made mincemeat of the NFL’s No. 1 scoring defense. The Seahawks, meanwhile, took a while to get going in eking out a win over the Redskins.

Health? Star Seattle running back Shaun Alexander is returning from a concussion, and who knows how he’ll fare? But then again, the Panthers’ top two backs won’t be playing at all.

Do you consider regular season results a better indicator of a team’s true quality? Not only did Seattle post a better record (13-3 against Carolina’s 11-5), the Seahawks were better statistically and won their division-while Carolina did not.

Oh, you think the quarterbacks will make the difference. Matt Hasselbeck of Seattle has the clearly superior passing skills and carried Seattle’s offense himself Saturday. But Jake Delhomme has been the only passer ever to face Tom Brady in the playoffs and match him throw-for-throw in the only playoff game Delhomme has ever lost.

To me, the most important matchup of the game will be Seattle’s rushing offense against Carolina’s stout defense. With Delhomme’s experience advantage, Hasselbeck will be the quarterback in greater need of solid run support.

In the regular season, Seattle had the league’s third-ranked rushing offense (153.6 yards per game) and its highest single rusher in Alexander (1,880 yards). Likewise, Carolina’s run defense was fourth in the league in total rushing yards allowed (91.6) and yards per carry allowed (3.6).

Something must give, and the momentum favors Carolina, which has already shut down New York’s and Chicago’s running in the playoffs. And Seattle ran the ball poorly last week against Washington.

But I have two reasons to expect Seattle to bounce back from last week’s game. First is the success they had running the ball at home throughout the regular season. Alexander cracked 100 yards in seven of their eight home games.

The second is that the Seahawks were out-of-sync last week not because they faced an unblockable defense, but because it was their first meaningful action since Christmas Eve. While timing and rhythm are talked about more in the passing game, they’re at least as critical to effective running. Seattle’s run blocking seemed to get better as the game went on, and there’s no doubt the coaching staff has made improvement a top priority this week in practice.

Because of home field, their great regular season, and the injury to Panthers back DeShaun Foster, I’m going with the Seahawks. I know I'll never call a final score correctly, but: Seattle 24, Carolina 20.

Comments

Mike said…
So true-in fact, Sports Illustrated ran an article today that said in Seattle's last seven playoff games, no Seahawk has gained more then FIFTY yards rushing. Obviously some of those were a long time ago, but still...

I am concerned about Seattle and far from fully confident in my pick. I think if they can force a stalemate with the run they'll win.
Anonymous said…
Hey, what's the rule that is not allowing Stephen Davis to play for the Panthers on Sunday?
Mike said…
Gosh, Anonymous, do I have to answer that again?

The Panthers placed Stephen Davis on injured reserve following his injury, meaning they can't use him until next season, regardless of whether he's healthy.
Mike said…
It is a tough call, and I'm tempted to write a whole new one predicting a Panthers victory. I think the Panthers could piece together a running game with Nick Goings, but they'd obviously be better off with DeShaun Foster.

Man, can it be Sunday yet?

Popular posts from this blog

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...