Skip to main content

NFC Championship: Carolina at Seattle

Fabulous. Most years at least one conference championship winner is blatantly obvious, but as soon as I start trying to predict winners with the whole world as my witness, I honestly think that both games could go either way.

I feel that way especially about Sunday’s NFC Championship game, featuring the Carolina Panthers at the Seattle Seahawks (4:30 Mountain, FOX). Depending on how you look at it, both teams look better than their opponents.

You think momentum is critical? The Panthers won by a smaller margin last week than Seattle, yet were more in control of their game against a better team and on the road. Despite surrendering 21 points to Chicago's pathetic offense, Carolina basically kept the Bears at arm’s length and made mincemeat of the NFL’s No. 1 scoring defense. The Seahawks, meanwhile, took a while to get going in eking out a win over the Redskins.

Health? Star Seattle running back Shaun Alexander is returning from a concussion, and who knows how he’ll fare? But then again, the Panthers’ top two backs won’t be playing at all.

Do you consider regular season results a better indicator of a team’s true quality? Not only did Seattle post a better record (13-3 against Carolina’s 11-5), the Seahawks were better statistically and won their division-while Carolina did not.

Oh, you think the quarterbacks will make the difference. Matt Hasselbeck of Seattle has the clearly superior passing skills and carried Seattle’s offense himself Saturday. But Jake Delhomme has been the only passer ever to face Tom Brady in the playoffs and match him throw-for-throw in the only playoff game Delhomme has ever lost.

To me, the most important matchup of the game will be Seattle’s rushing offense against Carolina’s stout defense. With Delhomme’s experience advantage, Hasselbeck will be the quarterback in greater need of solid run support.

In the regular season, Seattle had the league’s third-ranked rushing offense (153.6 yards per game) and its highest single rusher in Alexander (1,880 yards). Likewise, Carolina’s run defense was fourth in the league in total rushing yards allowed (91.6) and yards per carry allowed (3.6).

Something must give, and the momentum favors Carolina, which has already shut down New York’s and Chicago’s running in the playoffs. And Seattle ran the ball poorly last week against Washington.

But I have two reasons to expect Seattle to bounce back from last week’s game. First is the success they had running the ball at home throughout the regular season. Alexander cracked 100 yards in seven of their eight home games.

The second is that the Seahawks were out-of-sync last week not because they faced an unblockable defense, but because it was their first meaningful action since Christmas Eve. While timing and rhythm are talked about more in the passing game, they’re at least as critical to effective running. Seattle’s run blocking seemed to get better as the game went on, and there’s no doubt the coaching staff has made improvement a top priority this week in practice.

Because of home field, their great regular season, and the injury to Panthers back DeShaun Foster, I’m going with the Seahawks. I know I'll never call a final score correctly, but: Seattle 24, Carolina 20.

Comments

Mike said…
So true-in fact, Sports Illustrated ran an article today that said in Seattle's last seven playoff games, no Seahawk has gained more then FIFTY yards rushing. Obviously some of those were a long time ago, but still...

I am concerned about Seattle and far from fully confident in my pick. I think if they can force a stalemate with the run they'll win.
Anonymous said…
Hey, what's the rule that is not allowing Stephen Davis to play for the Panthers on Sunday?
Mike said…
Gosh, Anonymous, do I have to answer that again?

The Panthers placed Stephen Davis on injured reserve following his injury, meaning they can't use him until next season, regardless of whether he's healthy.
Mike said…
It is a tough call, and I'm tempted to write a whole new one predicting a Panthers victory. I think the Panthers could piece together a running game with Nick Goings, but they'd obviously be better off with DeShaun Foster.

Man, can it be Sunday yet?

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...