Skip to main content

Washington at Seattle

This week's playoff previews starts with the weekend's first game, the Washington Redskins at the Seattle Seahawks (2:30 pm Mountain-not sure why I used Eastern last time, FOX).

On paper this may not look like much of a matchup. The Redskins were 10-6 and couldn't even beat out the New York Giants for the division title. The Seahwaks went 13-3, have a real quarterback, and ran away with the NFC. I tend to agree with paper on this one.

However for this preview I will employ the completely contradictory tone and tell you why each team could win Saturday:

Why Washington Will Win:

1. Better coaching.
Though there are scores of coaches who can pile up regular season victories, only the elite few win consistently in the postseason. Look at the last five coaches to win Super Bowls: Bill Belichick, Jon Gruden, Brian Billick, Dick Vermeil, and Mike Shanahan. Not a weak link in the bunch.

Though Mike Holmgren and Joe Gibbs have each won a Super Bowl themselves (three, in Gibbs’ case), Gibbs clearly gives the Redskins an advantage. Holmgren has had a mostly up-and-down career, at least in terms of coaching teams up to expectations. Gibbs, meanwhile, has racked up an absurd 17-5 postseason record.

2. Defense. Linebacker LaVar Arrington had a monster game against Tampa Bay, topping off his ten tackles with a forced fumble and an interception. The scheming of defensive coordinator Gregg Williams may give them just enough of an edge to blunt the Seattle offensive.

Why Seattle Will Win:

1. Better offense.
That alone says absolutely nothing about Seattle, considering Washington racked up just 120 total yards against the Buccaneers. But points-wise, Seattle outscored everyone-even the mighty Colts-this season. Oh yeah, and which team has the MVP?

2. Better balance. No, the Seahawks can’t match the Redskins’ defensively-but then, they won’t have to. The numbers say Seattle’s run-stopping is even better than Washington’s, and controlling the line of scrimmage is, as Gibbs knows, crucial in postseason showdowns. Seattle has enough defense to slow Washington and more than enough offense to put points on the board.

Considering the above, and also the fact that Seattle’s team name isn’t a cruel reminder of abysmal race relations, I’m going to go with the Seahawks.

Comments

Mike said…
Why would you be a jerk and bring that up? Yes, Brunell's last good game was '96, or following that season, anyway. I'm going to go home and cry.

Popular posts from this blog

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...