Skip to main content

Washington at Seattle

This week's playoff previews starts with the weekend's first game, the Washington Redskins at the Seattle Seahawks (2:30 pm Mountain-not sure why I used Eastern last time, FOX).

On paper this may not look like much of a matchup. The Redskins were 10-6 and couldn't even beat out the New York Giants for the division title. The Seahwaks went 13-3, have a real quarterback, and ran away with the NFC. I tend to agree with paper on this one.

However for this preview I will employ the completely contradictory tone and tell you why each team could win Saturday:

Why Washington Will Win:

1. Better coaching.
Though there are scores of coaches who can pile up regular season victories, only the elite few win consistently in the postseason. Look at the last five coaches to win Super Bowls: Bill Belichick, Jon Gruden, Brian Billick, Dick Vermeil, and Mike Shanahan. Not a weak link in the bunch.

Though Mike Holmgren and Joe Gibbs have each won a Super Bowl themselves (three, in Gibbs’ case), Gibbs clearly gives the Redskins an advantage. Holmgren has had a mostly up-and-down career, at least in terms of coaching teams up to expectations. Gibbs, meanwhile, has racked up an absurd 17-5 postseason record.

2. Defense. Linebacker LaVar Arrington had a monster game against Tampa Bay, topping off his ten tackles with a forced fumble and an interception. The scheming of defensive coordinator Gregg Williams may give them just enough of an edge to blunt the Seattle offensive.

Why Seattle Will Win:

1. Better offense.
That alone says absolutely nothing about Seattle, considering Washington racked up just 120 total yards against the Buccaneers. But points-wise, Seattle outscored everyone-even the mighty Colts-this season. Oh yeah, and which team has the MVP?

2. Better balance. No, the Seahawks can’t match the Redskins’ defensively-but then, they won’t have to. The numbers say Seattle’s run-stopping is even better than Washington’s, and controlling the line of scrimmage is, as Gibbs knows, crucial in postseason showdowns. Seattle has enough defense to slow Washington and more than enough offense to put points on the board.

Considering the above, and also the fact that Seattle’s team name isn’t a cruel reminder of abysmal race relations, I’m going to go with the Seahawks.

Comments

Mike said…
Why would you be a jerk and bring that up? Yes, Brunell's last good game was '96, or following that season, anyway. I'm going to go home and cry.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...