Skip to main content

The Aftermath

Denver's defense has come up with all kinds of firsts the last few years.

They were the force behind Tom Brady's first playoff defeat as a pro (I guess that's redundant-he couldn't exactly have lost a playoff game in college, eh?). Just as surely, they were the biggest reason we became the first team to let Peyton Manning win a playoff game.

And today, they refused to stand between Ben Roethlisberger and his first Super Bowl.

Take away the uniforms and you would have thought Denver was the team playing its first game at altitude this year, not Pittsburgh. (Take away the uniforms and I never watch football again, but that's a different story.)

Instead, in the franchise's first AFC Championship appearance since John Elway retired, the defense let the Steelers control the tempo and enforce their will on the game.

In the first quarter, the Broncos let the Steelers on the board first with a field goal. That wasn't crippling, but when the Steelers added a touchdown, Denver was already in trouble. The problem with building your team around defense is that when you fall behind, your offense doesn't have enough experience making big plays. So, in other words, you can't fall behind.

Easier said than done, of course, but the last several Super Bowl champions were able to accomplish it. Think about it: if Champ Bailey hadn't dropped his potential touchdown pick on Pittsburgh's first offensive possession, the Broncos could be getting ready to join that list.

Instead, before the first half was over, the Broncos got their first points on a field goal-but gave up two more touchdowns, and were essentially finished.

What should the Broncos do this off-season?

Any loss, especially a playoff loss, shows many areas for improvement. I think the question for the Broncos is whether they stick with their current style or try to rebuild. For now, I say they have to stay the course.

I said throughout the regular season that the Broncos seemed a little lucky to be in the position they were. (Then I picked them to win the Super Bowl...yikes.) Things really lined up favorably for the Broncos this year-and rebuilding or not, it could easily be another seven years before we play for the conference championship again.

Every team has weaknesses, and it's tempting to say Denver's biggest need right now is a clutch quarterback. Get in line-the same can be said for probably 25 other teams, and I doubt the Broncos can seriously improve the position this offseason. (Though I have never been more confused by our offensive play-calling than I was the last two weeks.)

What we really need-and what we've needed for years-is a pass rush. Yes, we got pressure on Tom Brady, but it came when we gambled with heavy blitzes and besides, New England was still able to move the ball on us in huge chunks. (As an aside, I hope me referring to the Broncos as "we" doesn't bother anybody.)

Thus, and considering our run defense's knack for failing at just the wrong time, means the Broncos need defensive line help above all. Can you even name Denver's starting defensive tackles? For all the hype I've heard lately that the ex-Browns were surprisingly good additions, I certainly never saw any of them make plays.

It's a domino effect. We're loaded with speed and skill and the linebacker position, so the acquisiton of a single all-out pass rusher who will draw serious blocking attention frees up Al Wilson, Ian Gold, and D.J. Williams to make more plays on the blitz or while dropping back into coverage, where they can provide a tough but thin secondary with valuable assistance.

(Of course, improvement in the secondary's not a bad way to go, either.)

How would the Broncos have done if they had a pass rusher like Jacksonville's Reggie Hayward?

Hayward had 8.5 sacks in his first year with the Jaguars (since leaving the Broncos, as fans already know). That doesn't sound like much for the money he's making. But it's more than any two Broncos had-combined.

Let's hope Denver's next big first is finding some defensive line help.

Comments

Mike said…
Going for the Broncos all the way was probably just wishful thinking in the first place, but man! That game hurts. I haven't been bothered this much by a Broncos loss since Jacksonville in '96, and by any local team's loss since the Dallas Stars knocked out the Avs in Game Seven in 2000. This sucks.

Oh, by the way, Jake Plummer in a ski cap and his beard after the game looked more prepared for the X-Games than he ever did for the AFC Championship.
Anonymous said…
The Broncos had their chances. Three dropped INTs, countless 3rd and longs. The defense did not stop the Steelers and the the offense got into a panic mode too early in the game. The defense shut down the run game early, but opened up the secondary for Roethlisberger to tear the defense apart. And, the blitzing was poorly called and completely ineffective.

In an up note, the Nuggets did beat the defending NBA champions at full strength and Kobe scored 81 points on jump shots alone.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...