Skip to main content

Weekend in review

Leftover thoughts from the conference championship games:

The key to the AFC game was giving up that second TD right before halftime. Okay, the real key was the unstoppable Ben Roethlisberger, but in terms of momentum, that was what the Phantom calls the point of no return. The game got off to a tough start for Denver, but a 17-3 or 20-3 halftime lead is far from insurmountable-and had the Broncos capitalized on any of their opportunities, we could be talking about their awesome comeback right now.

Broncos history. The Broncos went into the game with six wins all-time in seven AFC Championship appearances (and the one loss came when Gary Kubiak replaced Elway because of injury-or, in other words, you can blame that AFC title game loss on Kubiak, too!). While that’s a nice stat, there’s no reason to think it would have anything to do with our chances yesterday.

What is indisputable, of course, is the curse of the 13-3 record, which has never been good for the Broncos. Most famously, the ’96 Broncos lost to Jacksonville after a thirteen-win regular season that clinched home-field advantage. Less recalled is the 13-3 team in 1984, which lost its first playoff game at home to the Pittsburgh Steelers.

As for recent Broncos squads and their performances in big games-which looks like the fluke now, the win over New England, or the loss to Pittsburgh in which we were as flat as the last two playoff losses to Indianapolis?

On another note, did yesterday’s game remind anyone else of the 1999 AFC Championship? In Elway’s last season, we hosted the New York Jets on a very windy day. Vinny Testaverde started out 13 for 13 while seemingly all of Elway’s passes were tipped or off-target. But thanks largely to the weather, New York had only a 3-0 halftime lead that swelled to 10-0 early in the second half. Behind Elway and an awesome defensive effort, the Broncos bounced back for a 23-10 win. (Jason Elam memorably remarked after the game that he was aiming his second-half field goals outside of the uprights.) All right, so the second half didn’t remind anyone of our last conference championship game, but you see what I’m getting at, right?

Gary Kubiak is going to Texas. It was no surprise when Kubiak immediately took over as head coach of the Houston Texans after the game. Normally, I’d be upset, but after the 4th-and-goal fade to Ashley Lelie against the Patriots and the two passes to Mike Anderson in our own end zone yesterday, I’m okay if some of our offensive braintrust skips town. (And we do still have Shanahan, who come to think of it was probably calling the plays yesterday.)

Seriously, though, I think it’s jacked that Kubiak could be interviewed during the playoffs, even if the interviews had to take place in Denver. A lot of things baffle me here, actually. I know the NFL is pretty much a year-round league, but the Texans seriously can’t wait a couple of weeks to conduct their interviews? And why do NFL teams even conduct interviews? OK, obviously you want to get to know the guy a little, but teams already know if a guy’s a good coach or not, don’t they?

It seemed like Kubiak was waiting so long to become a head coach so he’d get a great opportunity, but I don’t think he has that with Houston. Either they don’t take Vince Young, and the fans turn against the team from day one, or they do, and pressure and expectations soon become unrealistic. Can’t you see Kubes getting fired in the next three years? I wish the guy well, but the Texans suck.

Ben Roethlisberger. I have such mixed feelings now. I’ve been a big Roethlisberger fan since his senior year, when it was his strong and accurate arm made him, in my mind, the clear No. 1 pick. (Eli Manning? Please. I’d take Ben over Peyton at this point.) I told that to anyone who would listen, which was mostly just John, who seconded me and pointed out Roethlisberger’s impressive mobility.

I didn’t think he’d be quite this good this quickly, though it probably helped that he fell to a pretty good team. In any event, the best comparison I can think of is that he’s becoming the John Elway to Tom Brady’s Joe Montana. I hope the Patriots bounce back and these two face off in the playoffs time and time again.

Having said all that, he got on my nerves a little bit the last few weeks with his constant carping about being disrespected. I get it, Ben, you want more props. Then he really went over the edge and beat the Broncos. While I sort of felt a Super Bowl run for Denver had come out of nowhere and that I would be happy with whatever we did, I changed my mind pretty quickly once we fell apart yesterday. As much as I like him and want Jerome Bettis’ career to end on a high note, there is no way I’m rooting for Pittsburgh in two weeks.

Steve Smith. I felt like Sean Salisbury said it best on one of those shows on ESPN where they sit at a desk and talk about games (in other words, I’m not exactly sure what show I was watching, but it’s whatever’s on ESPN 24-7 anyway). He said Smith “doesn’t walk on water.” All the pregame talk that Smith was absolutely unstoppable was, of course, ridiculous. Smith’s an incredible player, but Seattle was able to slow him down. Not that they’ve found some solution and Smith will never have a good game or anything, but none of the rest of the Panthers were able to make Seattle pay.

Seattle’s defense. I said the key to Sunday’s game was whether Seattle could run on Carolina, and Shaun Alexander had 132 yards in Seattle’s 34-14 win. But his running was gravy-it was really Seattle’s defensive effort that won the game. Lofa Tatupu has been amazing in the playoffs, rookie or not. (That calls to mind the problem of calling a college team as a dynasty, when key players leave constantly. Don’t you think the Trojans could have used him against Vince Young?)

My prediction “skills”. I’m now 7-3 in the playoffs after a 1-1 weekend, but it could have been worse, because I talked myself into a Carolina win over the weekend. Of course, it could have been a lot better, too-one of my early drafts last week talked about what trouble Carolina would be in if Nick Goings went down, though I apparently edited that out.

Anyway, I am leaning towards Seattle in the Super Bowl right now. (There will be a complete breakdown later.)

Paul Allen’s teeth. Anyone see the Seahawks get the NFC championship trophy? (I’m sorry, the George S. Halas Memorial Trophy?) I have never seen such evenly distributed tooth discoloration or plaque (not sure which) on a billionaire. Nasty. (I’m not going to say anymore, though since I've badmouthed a Microsoft founder, I totally expect my computer to lock up the way it did when I read this.)

They were so bad, they almost made me forget Terry Bradshaw making a complete fool of himself during the trophy presentation...almost.

Comments

Mike said…
Yes, I have seen someone more lost. Did you know Bob's son used to play for the Broncos?
David said…
i freaking hate phill simms almost as much as todd christiansen. come to think of it, the only football announcer i like is keith jackson.

i've always thought kubiak was a class act, and i'm happy for him to get a shot. i wish him the best.

same for barnett, coaching pop warner in duluth mn, next year.

i'm also a fan of big ben. i like his class, and his tools. he's got heart and his crew like him. eli manning isn't a quarter of the qb ben is.

but i don't like the bus nor do i care about his lame personal touching story of finishing his career in motown. i could pull a more interesting subplot out of my hoo haa. bettis is just another emmitt smith. overrated to the core. the only thing he has is longevity. give that fat ass the ball several thousand times and watch his heft and sheer body mass allow him to gain his outstanding 3.8 yards a carry.

i'm pulling for the seahawks on this one.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...