Skip to main content

AFC Championship: Pittsburgh at Denver

Sunday’s AFC Championship Game (1 p.m. Mountain, CBS) between the Pittsburgh Steelers and Denver Broncos could, at first glance, hardly feature more similar squads.

And painted with broad strokes (both focus on running and defense) or small (both have offensive stars who weren’t drafted), the teams have a lot in common. And it’s not just styles, it’s statistics. Denver scored 24.7 points per game this year to Pittsburgh’s 24.3, and both allowed 16.1 points per contest.

Yet the game favors Denver. Why?

1. Offensive styles and matchups. You’re forgiven for thinking both teams run, run, and then run again. The Steelers surely run, but the runs are far more frequent and effective in the second half of games. It’s their passing game that helps build early leads.

Fortunately for the Broncos, their defensive strength is against the pass, despite deceiving defensive rankings.

The Broncos’ reputation as a run-focused squad is well-earned and accurate. While Pittsburgh’s defense is effective against any kind of play, they’ve jumped out to early leads in the first two playoff games and forced opponents to abandon the run. They won’t be able to do that in Denver, thanks to a more sizeable…

2. Home-field advantage. Like I’ve said before, home-field is more important to some teams than others, and Denver’s advantage is greater than most, thanks to the mile-high altitude. It allows the Broncos to control the tempo while opposing players are distracted by constant consultations with an oxygen mask. Meanwhile, the altitude helps enhance the sheer physicality of Denver’s rushing attack and gives the Broncos a chance at wearing down the Pittsburgh defenders.

To be fair, home field means less against Pittsburgh than it does against other teams. The Steelers are 8-2 on the road (including the postseason). But after last week’s dethroning of New England, Denver stands at a perfect 9-0 at Invesco Field.

3. Demeanor. Both teams faced tough opponents last week (it is the playoffs), but Pittsburgh’s victory was far tighter and more emotional. That could be good or bad, because while close games can warn of cracks in a team’s armor (think USC-Notre Dame), they can also give a team confidence to overcome future obstacles (think Patriots after the Tuck Rule game).

But Joey Porter’s whining following an enormously impressive victory-while completely understandable-suggests this Steelers team just might let their emotions run wild at crucial points in the contest. Meanwhile, the Broncos are a fearless bunch, highlighted by linebacker Ian Gold telling reporters Saturday night that he would really like to face the Colts, the team which had knocked out Denver two years in a row.

4. Coaching. Bill Cowher, meet Mike Shanahan. In other words, case closed.

Pittsburgh is a fast and physical team that can beat just about anyone. But not Denver Sunday. Broncos 30, Steelers 21.

Comments

Mike said…
Good point about the blitz. I just hope it doesn't backfire.
Anonymous said…
I don't think there is going to be quite some much scoring. Reed and Elam will be big factors this game-Broncos 23, Steelers 16

Note the time of this entry
Anonymous said…
Oh, and was anyone as impressed as I was about the was Todd Sauerbrun was able to tackle and force a fumble?
Mike said…
Dang it, Captain beat me to it.
David said…
damn it damn it damn it.

on my birthday, no les...
Mike said…
Oh, man. I'm sorry, bro...

Popular posts from this blog

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...