Skip to main content

Giants at Eagles

The weekend's final playoff matchup: the Philadelphia Eagles beat the New York Giants (2:30 p.m., FOX). (Sorry, I had to spoil one of them.)

Why did I rank the Giants ahead of the Eagles a few weeks ago? I don't know. The Giants had won the head-to-head matchup in overtime. But the Eagles beat them by two touchdowns the next Sunday and haven't looked back, closing the season on a five-game winning streak.

The Giants were ice-cold down the stretch, losing six of seven at one point. They beat the Redskins behind a huge game from Tiki Barber.

Good thing, because Barber is the Giants' only hope. (What, you thought I'd say Eli Manning?) Barber ran for 1,662 yards in his final season and factored in the passing game.  Too bad he's such a dweeb. The Eagles aren't the Colts or anything, but run defense is a major weakness for them. If Barber has a huge game, the Giants can come out on top.

Brian Westbrook ain't Barber, but he's not far behind. Westbrook got his first chance to shoulder the load this year, and he responded with a terrific campaign. Like Barber, he's a threat as a runner and a receiver.

Can Jeff Garcia be the difference? I would have doubted it a couple weeks ago, but he's had a special year. As a relief pitcher, he's been less spectacular than Dallas' Tony Romo but far more consistent. Which would you rather have in a playoff game? Garcia will look even better Sunday going against a Manning. And thus, the Eagles will win.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...
13 comments
Read more

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...
11 comments
Read more

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...
2 comments
Read more