Skip to main content

Giants at Eagles

The weekend's final playoff matchup: the Philadelphia Eagles beat the New York Giants (2:30 p.m., FOX). (Sorry, I had to spoil one of them.)

Why did I rank the Giants ahead of the Eagles a few weeks ago? I don't know. The Giants had won the head-to-head matchup in overtime. But the Eagles beat them by two touchdowns the next Sunday and haven't looked back, closing the season on a five-game winning streak.

The Giants were ice-cold down the stretch, losing six of seven at one point. They beat the Redskins behind a huge game from Tiki Barber.

Good thing, because Barber is the Giants' only hope. (What, you thought I'd say Eli Manning?) Barber ran for 1,662 yards in his final season and factored in the passing game.  Too bad he's such a dweeb. The Eagles aren't the Colts or anything, but run defense is a major weakness for them. If Barber has a huge game, the Giants can come out on top.

Brian Westbrook ain't Barber, but he's not far behind. Westbrook got his first chance to shoulder the load this year, and he responded with a terrific campaign. Like Barber, he's a threat as a runner and a receiver.

Can Jeff Garcia be the difference? I would have doubted it a couple weeks ago, but he's had a special year. As a relief pitcher, he's been less spectacular than Dallas' Tony Romo but far more consistent. Which would you rather have in a playoff game? Garcia will look even better Sunday going against a Manning. And thus, the Eagles will win.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...
47 comments
Read more

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...
19 comments
Read more

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...
2 comments
Read more