Skip to main content

Patriots at Chargers preview

The real Super Bowl is probably the last playoff game of the weekend, New England Patriots at San Diego Chargers. (2:30 p.m., CBS).

They’re the top two teams in the AFC, which is the top conference, and whoever wins this game should eventually win it all. I can not wait.

On one hand, you’ve got the up-and-coming Chargers, owners of a sparkling 14-2 record this year and, like so many great teams, a flawless home mark.

Their other statistics are equally impressive. The Chargers fell just shy of scoring five hundred points this season, averaging a league-best 30.8 points per game. And they didn’t do it like some Rams and Colts teams of recent vintage. They had balance. San Diego’s defense, spearheaded by the ethically-flexible Shawne Merriman, gave up only 18.4 points, seventh in the league.

Running back LaDainian Tomlinson, this year’s NFL MVP, ran for 1,815 yards and 28 touchdowns. He added just over five hundred yards and three more touchdowns through the air on his way to setting the single-season scoring record. Quarterback Philip Rivers, in his first season as a starter, threw for 3,388 yards and 22 touchdowns, with an even more impressive total of just nine interceptions. The aforementioned Merriman had 17 sacks. That’s three golden seasons, and I haven’t even mentioned standouts like Antonio Gates or Donnie Edwards. Bottom line, the Chargers are a fantastic and talented squad.

In the challenger’s corner, you have a team well-accustomed to the role, the Patriots, fresh off a 37-16 dismantling of the New York Jets.

The Patriots, winners of three of the last five Super Bowls, still have Tom Brady, the best quarterback in the world. The defense is still world-class, successful against the pass and the run and giving up just 14.8 points per contest this year, second only to Baltimore.

The Patriots’ real advantage (other than Brady) is, of course, head coach Bill Belichick, who will doubtless have some success limiting San Diego’s offensive fireworks. Chargers coach Marty Schottenheimer is as conservative as they come, which can be death in the playoffs, but he’s never had a team this good, either.

In the end, I have to go with San Diego. New England will be facing an offense that is historically good-a type of team they’ve certainly defeated before. But I’m more impressed with Tomlinson than I ever was with Peyton Manning or Kurt Warner. And San Diego is the most well-rounded team New England has faced since the Brady/Belichick ran began. And to be fair, the Patriots are pretty amazing in their own right. If you can only watch one football game this year, make it this one.

Comments

Mike said…
Good call, Cap.
Mike said…
But seriously, Roy Williams? Larry Brown? I guess every trend has its limits.

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...