Skip to main content

Patriots at Chargers preview

The real Super Bowl is probably the last playoff game of the weekend, New England Patriots at San Diego Chargers. (2:30 p.m., CBS).

They’re the top two teams in the AFC, which is the top conference, and whoever wins this game should eventually win it all. I can not wait.

On one hand, you’ve got the up-and-coming Chargers, owners of a sparkling 14-2 record this year and, like so many great teams, a flawless home mark.

Their other statistics are equally impressive. The Chargers fell just shy of scoring five hundred points this season, averaging a league-best 30.8 points per game. And they didn’t do it like some Rams and Colts teams of recent vintage. They had balance. San Diego’s defense, spearheaded by the ethically-flexible Shawne Merriman, gave up only 18.4 points, seventh in the league.

Running back LaDainian Tomlinson, this year’s NFL MVP, ran for 1,815 yards and 28 touchdowns. He added just over five hundred yards and three more touchdowns through the air on his way to setting the single-season scoring record. Quarterback Philip Rivers, in his first season as a starter, threw for 3,388 yards and 22 touchdowns, with an even more impressive total of just nine interceptions. The aforementioned Merriman had 17 sacks. That’s three golden seasons, and I haven’t even mentioned standouts like Antonio Gates or Donnie Edwards. Bottom line, the Chargers are a fantastic and talented squad.

In the challenger’s corner, you have a team well-accustomed to the role, the Patriots, fresh off a 37-16 dismantling of the New York Jets.

The Patriots, winners of three of the last five Super Bowls, still have Tom Brady, the best quarterback in the world. The defense is still world-class, successful against the pass and the run and giving up just 14.8 points per contest this year, second only to Baltimore.

The Patriots’ real advantage (other than Brady) is, of course, head coach Bill Belichick, who will doubtless have some success limiting San Diego’s offensive fireworks. Chargers coach Marty Schottenheimer is as conservative as they come, which can be death in the playoffs, but he’s never had a team this good, either.

In the end, I have to go with San Diego. New England will be facing an offense that is historically good-a type of team they’ve certainly defeated before. But I’m more impressed with Tomlinson than I ever was with Peyton Manning or Kurt Warner. And San Diego is the most well-rounded team New England has faced since the Brady/Belichick ran began. And to be fair, the Patriots are pretty amazing in their own right. If you can only watch one football game this year, make it this one.

Comments

Mike said…
Good call, Cap.
Mike said…
But seriously, Roy Williams? Larry Brown? I guess every trend has its limits.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...