Skip to main content

Chiefs at Colts

The Kansas City Chiefs will travel to Indianapolis to face the Indianapolis Colts this Saturday in an exciting playoff game beginning at 2:30 Mountain time and broadcast on the NBC television network.

The passing games of both teams could shred through the other’s defense. This game should feature the No. 1 and No. 2-rated passers in the league. Yet it won’t.

The Broncos won the Super Bowl after the 1997 season. (And don't you forget it.) In the season opener that year, the Broncos faced Kansas City and veteran quarterback Elvis Grbac, who’d been a backup on some powerful San Francisco teams. The Broncos beat the Chiefs. For the divisional rematch Grbac was injured, so the Chiefs started then-unknown quarterback Rich Gannon, who ran, passed, and rallied the Chiefs to a late victory. In fact, Gannon played so well in Grbac’s absence that many K.C. fans felt the team should stick with Gannon once Grbac was healthy. The Chiefs, though, decided to play Grbac in the playoffs, where they had home-field advantage. The Chiefs faced the Broncos for a third time in Kansas City’s first playoff game. Behind Grbac, they lost again. So, to recap: when the Chiefs went with the better-performing but lesser-known backup, they beat the Super Bowl champs. When they started the inferior but “proven” veteran, they went home early.

This year, Chiefs starter Trent Green, who had been a backup on some powerful St. Louis teams, missed time due to injury. His backup, Damon Huard, threw for eleven touchdowns and one interception in Green’s absence. In fact, only Peyton Manning had a better quarterback rating than Huard this year. Many Chiefs fans feel the team should stick with Huard even though Green is healthy, going as far as booing Green at home Sunday. However, the Chiefs will start Green in Saturday’s game. These two scenarios are in no way related.

Stars: Peyton Manning vs. Larry Johnson. Manning had another consistenly terrific year, but nothing is more consistent than his playoff performance. Larry Johnson set an NFL record for carries this season, but somehow didn’t win the rushing title. In other words, both teams have special offensive talents, but neither quite lives up to that best-in-the-league billing. (Everyone’s a Tomlinson convert at running back now, but before the season people acted like it was a toss-up.) Both are facing defenses ill-suited to stop them. Johnson will have an easier time against the Colts D than Manning will against the Chiefs, though. The Colts gave up more than five yards per carry this year to opposing runners. Of course, Manning is no stranger to preying on the weak himself, but the Chiefs do feature Manning’s old friend at corner, Ty Law.

One advantage for the Colts: the game will be on turf, which we all know magically helps the home team’s skill players outrun opponents, who remain at grass-speed.

I pick the Colts to win a high-scoring game, mostly on the strength of home-field advantage. However, this is the game I’m least certain about. (If Huard was starting, I’d go with Kansas City.) The Colts are due for a letdown, and the Chiefs can run all over them. Man. What do you think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...