Skip to main content

Divisional round

1. I think somebody screwed with the date on my computer. One weekend preview said,

[McNair] usually elevates his play under pressure, and not many quarterbacks can say that.

and I must have thought it was 2001 when I wrote that.

2. Seriously, though, what were the Ravens thinking? Brian Billick gave Hole Punch Sports an exclusive look at the secret formula behind his third-down game plan for Saturday's contest. It read:

If it is third down and x yards to go, select and successfully execute a play designed to gain (x-2) yards.

Just in case you were wondering.

3. Adam Vinatieri was one the biggest signings of the offseason. Certainly, he's behind Drew Brees on any serious list, but his clutch kicking is one element the Colts have sorely needed over the years, and he delivered Saturday.

4. From the "Completion Percentage is Overrated" Dept.: Steve McNair was 18/29 Saturday. In John Elway's last game, when he was Super Bowl XXXIII MVP, he went 18-for-29. No one on the planet thinks McNair had a good game yesterday, so why do I still hear people mention a 60-percent completion rate as if it were meaningful?

5. I have to give the Colts a little respect, even if I think their postseason success this year is a result of favorable matchups. They faced a Chiefs team starting the wrong quarterback, and a Ravens team that refused to win. But even if they were lucky...they've won more playoff games in the last nine days than the Broncos have since Elway retired.

6. Saints-Eagles. I was glad to see Deuce McAllister have a huge game in the playoffs, because he goes largely ignored playing ahead of Reggie Bush. Bush is a lot of things, but "a good NFL runner" is not yet one of them. (Y'all saw him try to catch that pitch.)

7. Props to Brian Westbrook for finishing his breakout year with an excellent postseason. Are the Eagles smart enough to keep calling his number when McNabb returns?

8. Rex Grossman's touchdown bomb to Bernard Berrian was sweet. No, the degree of difficulty wasn't there, but how often do you see a pass that deep where the receiver has to make no adjustment whatsoever?

9. Grossman's good, then, for this week. But the Bears barely squeaked it out over an overmatched Seattle team-it'll be interesting to see how they fare against the Saints, who played a nail-biter of their own.

10. The Chargers and Marty Schottenheimer did lose, but I don't think they lost because their coach was too conservative. I just think they got beat by a tremendous team. (I know I picked the Patriots to lose, but I said and still think that Chargers-Patriots was the real Super Bowl.) That said, some Chargers could have played a lot better, like Eric Parker and Shawne Merriman.

11. The Patriots really couldn't run the ball today, but that's never been their strength. I do think they do as a good a job as anyone of mixing up runs and passes, though, and giving you one when you expect the other.

12. I used to feel kind of bad for LaDainian Tomlinson, who seemed destined to spend his career on .500-and-under squads. Now he had his chance, and they lost. How will the Chargers respond? Can they get back to this spot next year? I think they might be the most intriguing team going in to next season. They're too young and too talented to write off forever, of course, but things were really lined up for them this year (sort of like Denver last year), and they couldn't capitalize. You never know how that will affect a team-look how the Broncos bounced back in '97 versus how they "bounced back" this year.

13. I was a little bummed I went 0-2 in the AFC this week, but Patriots at Colts? Oh, yes, I'll take that.

Comments

Mike said…
You're right, Reid made a terrible call, and I was thinking the same thing at the time.

I think Tomlinson really was more upset about getting beat and his frustration just boiled over a little bit. I do agree with him, though, that the Patriots are not particularly good sports. I don't really care that much, but I really hate it how some players are excused for that kind of behavior. (In other words, while I of course endorse good sportsmanship, almost no one practices it, so I'm annoyed that different players are held to different standards.) Take Hines Ward, for example. Last year, I think it was, he did someone else's dance in the end zone, and Chris Berman said something about how Ward wasn't drawing attention to himself because we all know what a team guy he is, or some nonsense like that. Obviously he WAS drawing attention to himself-we just saw it happen-so why lie? Ward and the Patriots get away with it; someone like, say, T.O. gets villified for it. (Which is weird, because T.O. does plenty of stuff actually worth criticizing.) I don't think it's that big of a deal in the first place, but if you're going to be outraged, be consistent. (For the record, I find T.O. far more entertaining than Ward, so I'd actually cut Owens more slack.)

I think Tomlinson is a better sport than most everyone, not that it does him any good today.

Popular posts from this blog

The NFL hates you.

It's no joke. It seems like the more devoted of a fan you are, the less the league cares about your continued patronage. The best example is the league's blackout policy, a wonderful gift from the league to its teams granting them added market pressure to charge whatever ridiculous amount they want for tickets. If a game doesn't sell out, the home market doesn't get to watch it on TV. (Basically, a 75-mile radius around the stadium doesn't get to see the game on TV if all the tickets aren’t bought first.) The NFL, like a needy girlfriend, says, "Hey, fans, you like us? Prove it." Then the league asks us to prove it again and again, week after week, year after year. I live within 75 miles of what should be John Elway Stadium, but Broncos fans are pretty much shielded from this stuff, right? Not all of them. One of my friends is as supportive a fan as the NFL can have: he's a Broncos season ticket holder and an NFL Sunday Ticket subscriber. That mean...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...

The day the music died

Seven years, seven months…actually, almost eight months, if you’re keeping track . That feels right, but also way too short. I started following the NBA around the 1996-97 season. I jumped on the Bulls bandwagon and will never regret it, but my favorite team was my hometown one, the Denver Nuggets. They went 21-61. The next year they were 11-71. I learned early on how few players actually made it big, even the most hyped. Antonio McDyess was one of the two real talents we had in those lean years, but his temperament and durability made him a disappointment. Still, I loved those teams: inside enforcers like Tommy Hammonds and Danny Fortson, the promising Bobby Jackson, the high-flying Darvin Ham, and even Nick Van Exel. The other talent was a young point guard named Chauncey Billups who I once saw, in person, hit a three from about halfway between the three-point line and halfcourt to beat the shot clock. Like it was nothing. I remembered pulling for us to get him in the draft, but wh...