Skip to main content

The NFC Contenders

Time for part 2. Right now the NFC has seven teams with winning records, and even though only six make the playoffs, I’ll rank all of them.

7. Atlanta Falcons (7-6)

Key stat:
The Falcons lead the league with videogame numbers in rushing (197.7 yards per game) and yards-per-carry (5.6).

Positives: Mike Vick is the best quarterback among the 7-6 teams, and Atlanta has won a few playoff games in recent years.

Negatives: Possibly too many to list. They had a four-game losing streak. They’ve been outscored this year. The defensive statistics are pretty unimpressive, and even worse if you consider that teams with good ground games typically inflate their defensive statistics by controlling the ball. The passing attack is 32nd in the league. (Wait, why do I like Vick?)

Outlook: Could be the odd man out, but if they’re in, it’s one-and-done.

6. Philadelphia Eagles (7-6)

Key stat:
Even with an unwanted quarterback change, the Eagles are third in offense.

Good: Jeff Garcia has no picks in 134 attempts, and his quarterback rating is slightly higher than Donovan McNabb’s. Brian Westbrook has already had, by far, his best year as a runner.

Bad: Garcia’s been a heck of an insurance policy, but he’s still a downgrade from McNabb. Defense is hopeless against the run. Team lost five of six at one point.

Outlook: Not really going anywhere, but a nice bounce-back season. Could they have done more with McNabb? Probably not.

5. New York Giants (7-6)

Key stat:
The Giants’ six losses came against teams with a combined 51-27 record (Colts, Seahawks, Bears, Jaguars, Titans, and Cowboys).

Plusses: They beat most of the teams they should have, including Atlanta on the road by thirteen. Tiki Barber is still getting it done-2nd in the NFC in rushing in his final season.

Minuses: Tom Coughlin. Inability to find any rhythm thanks to a difficult schedule.

Outlook: This team is decidedly average-they win the games they should and lose the games they should. I guess they might upset the Cowboys, but the Seahawks and Saints appear out of their league.

4. Dallas Cowboys (8-5)

Key stat:
Tony Romo’s 8.75 yards per attempt, a nearly two-yard improvement over Drew Bledsoe.

Good: Have won five of seven with Romo as starter. Offense good for 26.8 points per game, fourth in the league. Bill Parcells.

Bad: Obliterated by New Orleans last week. Most of their wins have come against bad teams. And there’s always a chance the young quarterback could come crashing down.

Outlook: The Cowboys can put up points, but so can other NFC teams. They should win the division and possibly a first-round game at home.

3. Seattle Seahawks (8-5)

Key stat:
Thanks to injury, Shaun Alexander has just 591 rushing yards, more than a third of which came in one game.

In their favor: They won the NFC last year. Matt Hasselbeck and Alexander are back from injuries. Tremendous home-field advantage.

Bad signs: They’ve been outscored on the season. Hasselbeck and Alexander still show signs of rust. The Seahawks have lost to both the 49ers and Cardinals-and that’s just in the last four games.

Outlook: So why am I so high on Seattle? Mostly because the rest of the NFC is so mediocre. (Dallas is the only other team I could even consider for third in the conference.) And, considering the obstacles this year, their record is amazing.

2. New Orleans Saints (9-4)

Key stat:
Drew Brees is already over 4,000 yards passing.

I like: the unstoppable deep passing attack, watching Reggie Bush highlights, and the attitude and production of Deuce McAllister.

I don’t like: the run defense that gives up more than five yards a carry. I don’t like their convincing home losses to two good-but-not-great AFC teams, the Bengals and the Ravens. And I’m already getting a little sick of the President.

Outlook: Clearly one of the top two teams in the NFC, and the best bet to upset Chicago. It probably won’t happen, but I’d love to see Brees beat the Chargers in the Super Bowl.

1. Chicago Bears (11-2)

Key stat:
Chicago has scored 27.1 points per game, tops in the NFC. Yes, more than New Orleans.

Good: The defense, especially against the pass. Devin Hester. Lovie Smith not turning it over to Brian Griese.

The question mark is Rex Grossman, naturally. He’s up, he’s down-six games with a rating higher than 100, and three games where he was below the 39.6 “all incompletions” mark.

Outlook: With games against Tampa Bay, Detroit, and Green Bay, the Bears should cruise to home-field advantage. I don’t expect much from Grossman-inconsistent passers usually become consistently awful when the playoffs roll around. But Chicago’s defense and special-teams let the Bears ask less of their quarterback than any other squad. And while the Saints are pretty legit by NFC standards, I don’t think New Orleans has the right team to win in Chicago in January.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...