Skip to main content

Seahawks at Bears preview

The NFL has thoughtfully given me two fantastic playoff games Sunday to snap me out of my Earl of Boykins funk.

The first is Seahawks at Bears (Sunday, 11 a.m., FOX). Seattle, of course, barely squeaked by Dallas last week after that botched hold by Dallas QB Tony Romo. Some have asserted that Romo dropped the ball because it was one of the special untouched “kicking” footballs. To which I say: no kidding. The whole point of the kicking footballs was to make field goals more difficult. The slick ball didn’t make a successful try impossible, but it had the effect it was designed to have.

Anyway, who cares about the losers? The Seahawks did some good things last week but, frankly, were unimpressive. Shaun Alexander was back to his playoff ways with a 2.9 yards-per-carry average, though he made some key conversions. It’s clear that Matt Hasselbeck has to carry this offense, and he connected on a mere fifty percent of his passes last week.

The Bears, though, are hardly better at quarterback. They’re just better everywhere else. There are some stats I bring up all the time, and this will be no exception: the Bears outscored Seattle and gave up fewer points. With Devin Hester fielding punts and kicks, you have to give them the edge on special teams, too.

So really, the only way the Bears can lose is with one of those 1.3 or 0.0 rating games out of quarterback Rex Grossman. The real disaster, though, would be bringing in backup Brian Griese, which would immediately seal Chicago’s fate. Griese’s lack of playing time is a huge reason Bears coach Lovie Smith has impressed me so much this year. He knows Grossman’s not a great option, but he also knows that the Bears have no other choice. When the backup has come in this year, he’s played like, well, Brian Griese. If you like a passing game that advances the ball in two- and three-yard chunks, then gives it up with spectacular 79-yard interception returns, Griese’s your man. Otherwise, you have to go with Grossman.

But Chicago really won’t need much from its offense considering how well the defense has played and considering how shaky Hasselbeck still is. (Hasselbeck’s got guts, no question, but he looks like he came back too soon.) And the Seahawks will have to be a pass-first, second, and third team. Chicago’s defense, though not quite Baltimore-quality, excels against the pass. Grossman may eventually cost them rings, but not this week. Chicago wins.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...