Skip to main content

Cowboys at Seahawks

The Seattle Seahawks host the Dallas Cowboys in a first-round NFC playoff game Saturday (6 p.m., NBC).

Both teams struggled in December, each going 2-3 for the month (and finishing with identical 9-7 records). The Cowboys' failures were predictable-two of their losses came to playoff teams, and Tony Romo had to cool down eventually. The Seahawks' slip-ups are a little more puzzling. With stars Matt Hasselbeck and Shaun Alexander back in the lineup, I expected them to build momentum for a playoff run.

They didn't. And I'm not sure why. There's not any one statistic that clearly points to trouble, unless "they're not really that good" is a statistic. (It isn't.)

Tony Romo, on the other hand, has come under fire in the last couple of weeks, partly because he's come down to earth and partly because he can't live up to the suffocating hype. (Being a Cowboy is sort of like being a Yankee in that regard-no one will assess you honestly.) Nevertheless, he's had good games mixed in with the bad, so he's hardly the shakiest QB in the postseason. He may even outplay Hasselbeck, a tremendous talent who's been sort of blah since his return from injury.

Regardless, the Seahawks will win. They still have experience and they still have a terrific home-field advantage. I also think Dallas lost momentum down the stretch, which is huge for a team with a young quarterback.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...