Skip to main content

It’s the Lakers

Thanks to their 89-70 victory over the Houston Rockets today, the Los Angeles Lakers will face the Denver Nuggets in this year’s Western Conference Finals. If you didn’t see the game, know that it was truly an easy win; the Lakers won by 19 despite Houston closing the game on a 12-0 run.

The schedule is now set for the next series as well. Game One is Tuesday night at 7 Mountain (ESPN), and the Nuggets and Lakers will play every other day until the series is over. Actually, the schedule’s been set for a few days, a fact I wish I’d known when I was looking for but not getting any tickets on Friday. (Did any of you have any luck on that front?)

Does today’s first Game Seven give anyone pause heading into the series? I say it’s about time the Lakers step up, because they haven’t done much to this point. But then, all we’ve done is beat a bunch of quitters, and then a one-Germensional team. I am excited to see the games, but would feel a lot better with the warm blanket of homecourt advantage nearby. Does anyone think we have to win the series in six?

One thing I did notice in today’s game that Kobe wasn’t the first guy off the bench congratulating his teammates, even though he totally was the night before when I watched Kobe Doin’ Work. Huh. That’s weird. Could the Lakers’ star be hiding some kind of injury? I mean, gosh, I can’t think of any reason for him to act differently during the movie like that…

Comments

Anonymous said…
Seriously are there people out there who actually like Kobe? Not in this state.

I think we'd better suprize them in Game one with some real competition, agression, and use our extra "rest" to beat them down. Then I think we can take them in 6.

I will enjoy this series thanks to my love hate relationship with these teams. Love the Nuggs, Hate the Lakes. Wish I could have been there give Kobe the ol "BOO" from the stands.

LT
7:49 PM
Anonymous said…
One more thing. I hope we keep this a short series, Pau is just not a beautiful man, the less I have to see this guy the better.
7:55 PM
Mike said…
I agree, how we come out in Game One is key. I don't doubt we'll start well, but I'm sure Phil knows how important it is to us to grab the homecourt edge in the series. Just two more days!
9:28 PM
blaine said…
It would have been nice to have homecourt against the depleted Houston Rockets, but I'm kind of glad the Lakers won. It will be so much more satisfying if the Nuggets beat the Lakers. I don't think we necessarily have to win the first game, but we do need to compete. I think we need to win one of two and neutralize the Lakers' homecourt advantage.

Do you think Karl will put K-Mart on Kobe like last year, or will he try Jones on him?
8:32 AM
Mike said…
Well, yeah, we don't need to win Game One necessarily, but I hope we at least have a real lead at some point. I mean the Lakers annihilated us last year. We were a different team, yes, but I still think a good start is huge.

I'm interested to see how we guard Kobe...I'm afraid he'll take Dahntay to the post early and often. I want to see if Carmelo will pick him up at times, too.
9:06 AM
John said…
I agree that Game 1 is critical - we need to take advantage of our extra rest and set a physical tone early.

As for the series, I think the play of our big men will be crucial because we will need to dictate a slower pace and avoid a shootout, and because Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom, and Andrew Bynum are softer than tissue paper when pushed around.
12:54 PM
Mike said…
I think our bigs are important because Gasol had such a huge series against us last year (esp. in Game One) but I think we'd do fine in an up-tempo game, even on the road. The Lakers traditionally have a bunch of guys who can hit the three-ball but I'm not impressed with their shooters this season.
1:25 PM
John said…
You are right about their shooters being less impressive this year, but they still have some guys who can score in a hurry. Plus, I love how we obviously intimidated the Mavs and their cross-eyed owner into submission, and wouldn't mind a repeat with the Lakers.
2:24 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...
5 comments
Read more

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...
9 comments
Read more

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...
12 comments
Read more