Skip to main content

Nuggets even the Western Conference Finals


With Carmelo Anthony sick and off to an icy start, the Denver Nuggets shouldn’t have had a chance tonight. But Chauncey Billups (loved that drive in the highlights) and J.R. Smith stepped up and led the team to a 120-101 victory over the visiting Los Angeles Lakers and even the Western Conference Finals at two games apiece.

The entire team played well as the Nuggets outscored the Lakers in every quarter. The Birdman was fantastic, and he, Nene, and K-Mart completely dominated the boards against an overmatched Lakers front line. Dahntay Jones had a sweet breakaway windmill dunk and a wonderful make-it-look-like-an-accident trip of Kobe Bryant. Carmelo came in and did his thing in the fourth quarter, forcing his way to the line when they needed to keep the lead up. And the fans were outstanding; one of the “no means no” chants came through crystal-clear on TV. You know the league’s not happy about that.

Really, the only complaint Nuggets fans can have is about that stretch in the fourth quarter where the clock seemed to move backwards and the Lakers got free throw after free throw. But the next time I looked up J.R. was sinking threes and Denver was cruising to an easy win. Well, that and, as Stuart Scott reports, Bryant scoring the most points ever in the first four games of a conference finals. That part’s rough.

The Lakers, for their part, continued not to go to Pau Gasol that much and still rely on Kobe to do everything. Does anyone else on that team have another gear? And what is up with Phil Jackson? He had one of the most bizarre nights I’ve seen from a coach in a while. First was Kobe and Gasol sitting on the bench for so long in the fourth quarter. Once Kobe came in, he hit a few shots in a row. The Nuggets had a big lead and were in Morey Rule territory with plenty of time left, but you never know what Bryant’s capable of, especially if he’s going to play several more minutes anyway. Jackson also pulled that ridiculous move where he didn’t sub anyone in for Luke Walton once he fouled out. I don’t know what that was about because it looked like a pretty clear foul to me. The real question is why Jackson had Luke on Carmelo in the first place.

Anyway, the Nuggets go back to L.A., where they’ll have to win at least Wednesday (7 Mountain, ESPN) or Sunday to stay alive. How do you like their odds?

Comments

John said…
The key to this game was our big men coming up so huge. I could tell from how we were controlling the glass in the early going that we were going to get it done. And, of course, our team proved its mettle by rallying when Melo struggled. (Just imagine how the entire Laker franchise would fold if Kobe played sick.)

Game 5 is pivotal, but not a must-win. Still, I will feel a lot better about our chances in the series if we win Game 5, which I am starting to think is a real possibility if we stay hungry.
blaine said…
I love our odds to get it done tomorrow in L.A. With J.R. finally showing up in this series and Nene and K-Mart fighting for every rebound, the Nuggets will be tough to beat.

I thought it was really weird that Jackson didn't have Kobe and Gasol in at the beginning of the fourth quarter too. Was he worried that Kobe was going to run out of gas later in the series? Kobe does usually sit out the first couple of minutes of the fourth quarter, but I don't think he came back in until around the 7 minute mark.

I'm not sure how I felt about Jones tripping Kobe. The Laker-hater in me was thrilled, but I also don't want to see the Nuggets or Jones labeled as a dirty player.
Mike said…
I had the same thought about Kobe and the Lakers. The Nuggets are clearly the deeper team.

I think getting the 3-2 lead is pretty critical, but hey, at least we saw how the Nuggets respond to adversity last night.

I feel like Jackson was almost conceding the game with his subs, which might have been the smart thing to do. He has to know Kobe's all they've got.

Like I said on Twitter, Jones' play may have been dirty, but it wasn't anywhere near as dirty as Derek Fisher's open-field tackle in the Houston series.
Anonymous said…
All I could think is Finally! Finally we got back to passing the ball, rebounding, and scoring in the 120 point range. If we can continue to do those things and keep it at our tempo then we can win the series. This game was huge a make or break, we lose this one the series is over, we gain confidence from this game and the Lakers could be over. I really like our chances for game five and a win at home for game six. At least a day or two of rest before the magic (my ealier prediction).

If we go to game seven I won't have any finger nails left!

LT
Meg said…
Can it be that the Nuggets play better with adversity? I thought the most amazing thing about this game was that with Melo sick everyone else played their best games. You really thought they shouldn't have had a chance but they just kept shining. Shame on Jones--I know everyone else does it too but that doesn't make it right. Still, I would much rather watch a team play than Kobe Bryant. Keep going Nuggets.
Mike said…
Shame on Jones? Aw, come on...
David said…
so far, it seems like both teams think they should win this series. who ever won the last game, gets a big ego, and then loses.

ok, maybe it's not that simple, but damnit nuggets put these sissies away!
Mike said…
Actually, I think that's pretty close. The Lakers have long had a tendency to either underestimate teams or not put them away. Wednesday night's game will be huge.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...