Skip to main content

Nuggets lose Game Five

I won’t say the series is over, but tonight’s game, a 103-94 victory by the L.A. Lakers over the Denver Nuggets, really hurt.

I’d been nervous all day; I guess as a Broncos fan I don’t remember what deep playoff runs feel like. While Game Four was a game we had to win, it felt coming into tonight that our best shot of taking the series was to win Game Five, too. Surely the Lakers knew this and stepped up with their best effort of the series. It was their one good effort for a few players. It’s annoying how guys like Lamar Odom will get praised for this game.

The start of the fourth quarter is obviously where we lost the game, but the Lakers outplayed the Nuggets for most of the game, even in the tied first half. It was kind of like how some of our games with the Hornets played out: we controlled the tempo, and were clearly dominating, but didn’t have an actual lead yet. Tonight the Lakers did the same to us. They played just hard enough on defense to keep our shooters from developing any kind of rhythm. Why they don’t play like that all the time, I couldn’t tell you, but they clearly went all-out tonight and played well from start to finish. Man, I hate those guys.

The Nuggets’ backs are against the wall. Last time that happened, after Game Three, they responded with a huge home victory. Let’s hope they can unleash the running game at the Pepsi Center Friday night (7 pm Mountain, ESPN).

Comments

blaine said…
Wow, watching the Nuggets fall apart midway through the third quarter was torture.

It seems like all year J.R. and Billups have been able to hit their open Js but for some reason they just aren't falling in this series. I would credit the Lakers' D, but it seemed like most of shots they missed were good, open looks.

Nene's sixth foul was totally bogus, but really I guess the game was pretty much over by that point. Nene wasn't really doing much for us anyway. He couldn't score (and missed two really easy layups) and he allowed stupid Odom to get 14 freaking rebounds last night.
John said…
This was a tough loss - while I don't think the game was a must-win, it was pivotal for the series. The big difference to me in this one was that the Lakers took advantage of opportunities down the stretch, and we didn't.

The other thing that worries me is that the Lakers adopted the game plan I was afraid they would use for the entire series: posting up and making the most of their height advantage inside. I am afraid we don't have a good answer to that strategy on defense.

Lamar Odom was getting way too much credit for finally showing up. At one point in the fourth quarter one of the commentators said something like "this is what Lamar Odom does every night," in direct contradiction of 7.5 ppg in the first 4 games of the series.
Mike said…
Ha ha, yeah! I think that was traitorous ex-Nug Mark Jackson. Yeah, Lamar Odom does this every night--why do you have to tell us that, then? Eventually he said this is what's expected of Odom, and I was like, maybe that's true, but even by now you should stop expecting it.

The Lakers have a huge edge inside, just like they did last year in the series. It's a shame Nene is our only real post defender. Gasol's shiftiness makes him a bad matchup for the Birdman.

Smith and Billups were getting open looks, I suppose, but they weren't as open as the first two series, and LA closed on shooters with some urgency. I don't know what Smith caught before this series but he hasn't been himself, though of course he's had flashes.
John said…
It ordinarily is hard to hear Mark Jackson's cogent analysis in between Jeff Van Gundy's rote compliments to the officials for clear no-calls, but that one came through loud and clear. Someday the NBA will finally realize that Odom is a second-rate player at best, even though he got paid like an All-Star in college.

The Lakers' post presence has been a major issue, even in earlier games when it showed up on the glass instead of in the scoring column. To me, it speaks volumes of Phil Jackson's perceptiveness that he benched Andrew Bynum when the game mattered most.

Smith has had a rough series, and unlike unsual, it seems to be in his head now.
Anonymous said…
I've enjoyed watching the Nuggs this late in the season, but I really didn't want a 7 game series, which may or may not happen after Friday.

I thought that was the Lakers best showing for whole series and unfortunatly we went cold at the wrong time. This whole series has been the worst 3 point shooting I've seen from the Nuggs which hasn't helped at all. Even Billups seemed out of sorts last night.

At this point we have to recover and get our "swagger" back on Friday cause unless we really put them away by ten points or more in the Staples Center we're in big trouble on Game 7.

I have to give Kleiza props, he was playing aggressive he just lacked the exprience of being on the court that late in the game, with some more confidence he could be huge.

LT
DG said…
What frustrated me was how little Nene and K-Mart did during the 4th quarter. Nothing they shot went in.

Look, if we get seven Nugs in double figure range on offense again, like game 4, what LA's big men do inside won't matter. It shouldn't have mattered last night. Although, I will say that I'm not convinced this double-teaming of Kobe is right when they seem so slow to cover the back door . . .
Mike said…
Yeah, John, Smith's confidence seems shaky, which is something I never would have thought possible.

I think swagger is huge, because we didn't have enough energy or hustle last night, and no momentum whatsoever carried over from Game Four. I think we have to count on more than just making more shots...we weren't always getting the greatest shots, I thought.

Kleiza is pretty talented offensively but I just worry about him being a go-to guy in the fourth. I'd rather lose because Carmelo or Chauncey missed. That said he helped us claw back into it, kind of.

Dave, you're right, and I think it's all about pace. When we're the aggressors, their big men disappear. When we're not, they dominate.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...