Skip to main content

It’s the Lakers

Thanks to their 89-70 victory over the Houston Rockets today, the Los Angeles Lakers will face the Denver Nuggets in this year’s Western Conference Finals. If you didn’t see the game, know that it was truly an easy win; the Lakers won by 19 despite Houston closing the game on a 12-0 run.

The schedule is now set for the next series as well. Game One is Tuesday night at 7 Mountain (ESPN), and the Nuggets and Lakers will play every other day until the series is over. Actually, the schedule’s been set for a few days, a fact I wish I’d known when I was looking for but not getting any tickets on Friday. (Did any of you have any luck on that front?)

Does today’s first Game Seven give anyone pause heading into the series? I say it’s about time the Lakers step up, because they haven’t done much to this point. But then, all we’ve done is beat a bunch of quitters, and then a one-Germensional team. I am excited to see the games, but would feel a lot better with the warm blanket of homecourt advantage nearby. Does anyone think we have to win the series in six?

One thing I did notice in today’s game that Kobe wasn’t the first guy off the bench congratulating his teammates, even though he totally was the night before when I watched Kobe Doin’ Work. Huh. That’s weird. Could the Lakers’ star be hiding some kind of injury? I mean, gosh, I can’t think of any reason for him to act differently during the movie like that…

Comments

Anonymous said…
Seriously are there people out there who actually like Kobe? Not in this state.

I think we'd better suprize them in Game one with some real competition, agression, and use our extra "rest" to beat them down. Then I think we can take them in 6.

I will enjoy this series thanks to my love hate relationship with these teams. Love the Nuggs, Hate the Lakes. Wish I could have been there give Kobe the ol "BOO" from the stands.

LT
7:49 PM
Anonymous said…
One more thing. I hope we keep this a short series, Pau is just not a beautiful man, the less I have to see this guy the better.
7:55 PM
Mike said…
I agree, how we come out in Game One is key. I don't doubt we'll start well, but I'm sure Phil knows how important it is to us to grab the homecourt edge in the series. Just two more days!
9:28 PM
blaine said…
It would have been nice to have homecourt against the depleted Houston Rockets, but I'm kind of glad the Lakers won. It will be so much more satisfying if the Nuggets beat the Lakers. I don't think we necessarily have to win the first game, but we do need to compete. I think we need to win one of two and neutralize the Lakers' homecourt advantage.

Do you think Karl will put K-Mart on Kobe like last year, or will he try Jones on him?
8:32 AM
Mike said…
Well, yeah, we don't need to win Game One necessarily, but I hope we at least have a real lead at some point. I mean the Lakers annihilated us last year. We were a different team, yes, but I still think a good start is huge.

I'm interested to see how we guard Kobe...I'm afraid he'll take Dahntay to the post early and often. I want to see if Carmelo will pick him up at times, too.
9:06 AM
John said…
I agree that Game 1 is critical - we need to take advantage of our extra rest and set a physical tone early.

As for the series, I think the play of our big men will be crucial because we will need to dictate a slower pace and avoid a shootout, and because Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom, and Andrew Bynum are softer than tissue paper when pushed around.
12:54 PM
Mike said…
I think our bigs are important because Gasol had such a huge series against us last year (esp. in Game One) but I think we'd do fine in an up-tempo game, even on the road. The Lakers traditionally have a bunch of guys who can hit the three-ball but I'm not impressed with their shooters this season.
1:25 PM
John said…
You are right about their shooters being less impressive this year, but they still have some guys who can score in a hurry. Plus, I love how we obviously intimidated the Mavs and their cross-eyed owner into submission, and wouldn't mind a repeat with the Lakers.
2:24 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...
47 comments
Read more

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...
19 comments
Read more

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...
2 comments
Read more