Skip to main content

It figures

Without getting into any details, today sucked, and so it’s fitting that the Lakers took down the Nuggets in Game One tonight.

What’s sad, but also reassuring, is that the Nuggets put themselves in position to win the game. They had a big lead in the first quarter, which is almost annoying at this point, because unless you’re playing the Hornets you always lose a lead you build that early. But they also had some good leads in the fourth quarter. If you’re not familiar with this rule, which I think I’ve heard the Sports Guy credit to Houston Rockets GM Daryl Morey, it’ll totally change the way you watch games. The quote is from Michael Lewis’ awesome profile of Shane Battier:

One statistical rule of thumb in basketball is that a team leading by more points than there are minutes left near the end of the game has an 80 percent chance of winning. If your team is down by more than 6 points halfway through the final quarter, and you’re anxious to beat the traffic, you can leave knowing that there is slightly less than a 20 percent chance you’ll miss a victory; on the other hand, if you miss a victory, it will have been an improbable and therefore sensational one.

So remember when Carmelo Anthony got caught by the sideline and called that timeout, but then right after the break caught a pass from Nene for a dunk? That gave the Nuggets a seven-point lead with 7:28 left, a lead they kept past when the clock ticked under seven minutes remaining. The Nuggets also led by six inside of six minutes and five inside of five. And, oh yeah, Chauncey Billups' three gave us a two-point lead with 1:38 remaining.

So what happened? Well, I refuse to turn this blog into a bunch of whining about the officiating, so I guess I can’t explain it. Also, the Lakers were getting the ball to Kobe Bryant better than the Nuggets were to Chauncey or Carmelo in the closing minutes. (Thankfully, both 7 and 15 played well when given opportunities down the stretch.) Anthony Carter’s inbounds pass that got stolen was absolutely atrocious, too. I think the Nuggets will be a lot better off on offense when J.R. Smith gets back on track, though. While he did hit one big three, he usually provides a bigger lift at the start of the fourth quarter.

My other concern is Denver’s first-half defense on Bryant. Way too many times he was allowed to get the ball down low and simply elevate for an easy shot. I don’t know how to prevent that but the Nuggets have to find a way or this is going to be a very short series.

Comments

David V. said…
Tough loss to swallow.

Melo played out of his mind and proved he is a superstar in the league. Maybe after a performance like this the NBA will reconsider the Finals match up...

Sorry mike but i had to go there.
Anonymous said…
Disappointing. Yes. But there was some hope there. To be honest I thought the Lakers truly showed up to play and were giving it their all. (I hope I'm right about this) If that's the Laker's best and I percieved we were dominating them most of the game and while making a stupid mistakes and missing a fair number of good shots, like the free ones you get from the line, then we still have a good chance against this team.

The Lakers did slow us down by gaurding the passing lanes for Chauncey, from what I saw he didn't have a lot of places to go. By the way, why did we take out Anderson to let Carter inbound?
Mike said…
I agree about 'Melo, who is playing great the last few games.

I don't know if that was quite L.A.'s "best", but it's pretty close to what I've seen from them even when they are playing well. That Derek Fisher three before halftime was awful, even I'll admit that's the one shot Fisher is going to make. I couldn't believe Chauncey missed three from the stripe like that, so uncharacteristic.

Yeah, I don't get what happened on that inbounds play, but to be fair L.A. was playing pretty good D.
John said…
A huge disappointment -we had every opportunity to steal home court advantage and came up just a little short. My thoughts:

(1) Melo was brilliant and proved he can come up huge on the huge stage.

(2) Chauncey struggled, and the fact that we were still in it with him playing poorly speaks volumes about this team.

(3) We HAVE to be better from the foul line. if we had hit just half of the free thows we missed, our free throw percentage still would have been below 80% and we would have won.

(4) We HAVE to be better on the glass. Period.

(5) Carter's in-bounds pass was reckless. We still had a timeout remaining, and should have used it to swap him out for Andersen or K-Mart or anyone else who can see over the dashboard while driving.

(6) Lamar Odom proved once again that he is only in the league because he is (1) left-handed and (2) ganglier than a praying mantis.

I'm afraid the league has foreordained the outcome yet again . . . but we still have a chance if we can settle into control in Game 2.
blaine said…
That was a great game...until the last 5 minutes that is.

Melo was almost unstoppable and his defense was terrific and has gone underappreciated this year.

I agree with John on the free throws. I don't think I've
EVER seen Billups miss three freebies in a row, so I feel confident that we will shoot a much high percentage from the stripe in the next game. Also, J.R. was a non-factor in the game and he has been our third highest scorer in the playoffs, so I expect him to play much better in the next game as well. All in all, I think it's encouraging that some of our key players didn't contribute and we still outplayeded the Lakers. Without K-Mart fouling Kobe and AC throwing the ball away, we probably still would've won the game. I think the Nuggets will come back tomorrow and play really hard and get a win.

That being said, it really sucks to give a game away to the Lakers like that, especially in game one.

I liked your Dork Elvis reference. Ever since you sent me that article on Battier I watch the lead and the clock like a hawk in every single NBA game that I watch with that stat in mind.
Mike said…
John, agreed on points one and two: I also think we can rely on Chauncey not to have a poor game again any time soon.

Your point five is hilarious because Carter was subbed in for Andersen. Yes, really.

Point six would make more sense if this was baseball, but it still seems to be true: how is Odom still so lacking in many basketball skills?

Blaine, big picture I think you're right. Assuming all our guys can get it clicking again I think we can give the Lakers a lot more than we have.

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...