Skip to main content

Weekend basketball

Watched some basketball this weekend, and here's what I noticed:

1. I caught part of the Houston Rockets at Denver Nuggets game Friday night. The Nuggets' struggles have less to do with chemistry and more to do with a complete lack of discipline and intelligent play.

Allen Iverson still looks for his own shot just a little too often in trasition, it seems, but at least he creates a very good shot for himself. Carmelo is still too willing to take bad shots. Steve Blake is a better fit on the roster than I thought he'd be, but he also clearly belongs in a reserve role. He's willing to hustle and very willing to pass, but he's not an especially skilled passer and, at times, made surprisingly poor decisions on the fast break. (Obviously the trade deadline is past, but the Nuggets have spent years trying to run at altitude without a gifted distributor at the point, which makes no sense.)

Add it all up and you have a team that looks extremely outcoached right now. I don't think firing George Karl would solve all or any of our problems, but I do think his hands-off approach to the offense is starting to backfire. It seemed too many times that guys were pretty much doing whatever they wanted, without any fear of repercussions.

So if you were wondering how a team with Carmelo and AI can be so mediocre, now you know.

2. I saw a bit of Carolina-Duke, but fell asleep before Gerald Henderson's classless* and unconscionable cheap shot on Tyler Hansbrough. (What can I say, I've been sick.) It just pisses me off too much to discuss it. My biggest regret was that it was basketball, not hockey, else I'd know for sure Henderson would get his in the next game. Instead, with Roy Williams and Mike Surechefski on the benches, you know next time's postgame story will be how proud they are of their guys for being mature enough to just play basketball. Oh, and Billy Packer needs to shut up.

3. Duke's never been a very athletic team, of course, but their skill and conditioning are usually second to none. That's how they so often control the tempo. Not so yesterday. It was only one game, but the Blue Devils were worse in transition than any Duke team I've seen in a long time. Forget their RPI-I will be absolutely shocked if Duke does anything in the tournament this year.

4. Carolina's break was relentless. I hope the Nuggets took some notes on how a team really pushes the pace.

* = I typically loathe the "class" argument, which I associate with Utah Jazz fans and other sore losers. And Carolina DID win, and pretty handily. But it's the kind of thing a Duke booster would constantly brag about, which is why I point it out here.

Comments

John said…
"Surechefski" - classic.

I had the same response to that move - even baseball has some code of retaliation (beaning a guy when he comes up to bat), and a mere 1-game suspension is way too good for the likes of a sore loser who lands a haymaker on a defenseless player. And I was disappointed at Roy Williams for not getting up is KRyzxzzsiehaoeki's face and totally chewing him out.

The Nuggets are a huge disappointment to me. We had a point guard who could push the ball up the floor and instill some offensive discipline. I think his name was Earl Boykins.
The Goreman said…
Yeah, I miss Boykins a lot too. Did you guys see the bit on PTI today about Karl benching Anthony? I think we're gonna lose it the firt round again this year, if we're lucky.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...