Skip to main content

Shoot. (It's tournament time!)

I know almost nothing about college basketball this year. So my bracket will probably win my family's tourney challenge for once! Har de har, ain't that always the truth.

I was going to leave it at that, and let y'all have at it in the comments, but I think I need to say something. College hoops have been on pretty much every time I turned on my TV, so I've probably seen a little more college basketball this year than I have in the past. I just haven't seen the right teams. Anyway, here goes:

- All hail North Carolina! Since they're a No. 1 seed and my favorite team, they're the clear Hole Punch pick for the national championship, even though I'm a little surprised they're a top seed.

- I look forward to Kansas becoming the first No. 1 seed to lose in the first round.

- Remember when people said Duke was on the bubble? Now they're a 6th seed, which isn't bubble-level at all. Remember, kids: if you're in a major-enough conference, you only need to be one of the top six or so teams to have a shot at being the absolute best team in the country. That certainly makes sense to me.

- Seriously, just so no one thinks I ran from my earlier predictions: Duke is going home very soon.

- I don't know if I'm supposed to call BYU one of my alma maters-I went there as a freshman but transferred-but as a blogger, I'm contractually obligated to mention they got a No. 8 seed. Yeah, baby! You don't mess with the Cougars! Actually, messing with them is the blueprint for destroying a BYU team in any sport-just be a little physical. This is why the championships they factored in around the time I studied there were volleyball and cross country.

- The play-in game is a really stupid idea.

- This is bad, but...I look forward to seeing Kevin Durant in extended action for the first time. (And I call myself a basketball fan.) Texas is a No. 4 seed, so they should make it to the Sweet Sixteen, I guess. If Texas loses in the first round or two, though, I wouldn't read too much into it. Being the best player on the floor doesn't have as big of an impact on winning in college basketball as it does in the NBA. Yes, I remember Dwyane Wade taking an unsung Marquette team to the Final Four, but I also remember Tim Duncan's Wake Forest squads doing minimal tournament damage.

- Texas A&M has the highest seed (No. 3) of my family's teams (Texas and BYU are the others), so congrats to them. They also have the best team and should advance the deepest. In other words, only Dave should feel humiliated if his team loses first. (Also, bro, congratulations!)

- Props to the team at SI.com, which thankfully noted "All Times Eastern" on the pdf bracket I just printed out. There are no times listed on the bracket.

Comments

John said…
I actually think North Carolina has a decent chance to win it all - they have the talent, but they may lack the experience. I am leaning toward Florida for that very reason at the moment, but I find it hard to count UCLA out, even with its subpar conference tourney performance. And Kansas has a better chance of losing-to-a-16-seed infamy than making the Final Four, which is something I never thought I would say once they got rid of Roy Williams.

Duke to me is basketball's version of Notre Dame football - no matter how badly they suck, they still get more pub than they deserve. Which is why the Irish spend every January getting pummeled by a vastly superior team in a BCS game and Surechefski's squad will be lucky to make it out of the first round this year.

Durant is a complete stud to watch, and the fact that he does it with the likes of such an inexperienced squad around him speaks volumes.
Mike said…
The thing that bugs me about Florida-well, one of the things-is that they struggled down the stretch this year. But they struggled last year, everyone says. Aaaaaaand, your point is...? I don't see why turning around one season means that having to turn around another is some kind of good omen.

Also, I should have said something about Ohio State. Greg Oden looks like he's forty, am I right people? People? Like he's got a beard and...never mind.
David said…
hole punch sports readers want to know

how do you see the bruins doing?
John said…
Yes, Greg Oden looks old enough to be Kevin Durant's father, but he has that Shaq single-shot repretorie down pat.

I like UCLA to make the Final Four . . . but beyond that I don't know what to expect.
Mike said…
Oh, good question. I should have mentioned them earlier. The problem is that I haven't seen UCLA play. But I've heard nothing but good things about them, especially their defense.

Looking at the stats, etc., though, I'm a little concerned. For one, since they got off to such a great start, I wonder if their 26-5 record (13-5 in 2007) is a bit deceptive. Plus they've lost their last two.

Here's the thing, though-all the other major teams have question marks, too. Florida hit a rough patch, Ohio State only loses when they play a good team, and Kansas is Kansas come tourney time. I think UCLA deserves its No. 2 seed, but I'd be a little surprised if they get back to the title game.
David said…
patton to niu? good riddance.

also:
how about some spring training coverage up in here?

a cry to deaf ears, i know.
Mike said…
All right, I got around to the baseball. As for Patton...I agree.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...