Skip to main content

Broncos get Daniel Graham

The Broncos signed tight end Daniel Graham, formerly of the New England Patriots and a one-time University of Colorado star, to a five-year, $30 million contract with $15 million in guarantees.

The length of the deal is kind of a funny conicidence, because five years is exactly how long it's been since I would have cared that the Broncos acquired Graham.

Admittedly, I'm excited. The first time I saw Graham play live, my brother ("John" in the comments) told me to keep an eye on him. Glad I did. He was incredible! Not only was Graham one of CU's finest blockers (back then, that meant something), he was easily its most clutch receiver. I left that game knowing he'd be a star.

As a pro, Graham has 1,393 receiving yards. That's not last year. Not in his best year. But in his entire five-year career. What happened? I don't really know. He had some problems with drops for a while, but he just never became a central part of the Patriots' offense. Instead, guys like Deion Branch emerged as Tom Brady's favored targets. (Graham won some nice jewelry with New England, so I doubt he's too upset about how life turned out.)

As anyone watching Tony Scheffler last year learned, the Broncos will never hesitate to throw to a tight end, no matter how many passes he drops. Graham could end up a pretty good pick-up; I just can't believe the money everyone is throwing around.

Some historical persepctive: After the 1999 season, the Broncos let the game's premier tight end, Shannon Sharpe, go to the Ravens. Sharpe was returning from a broken collarbone suffered the season before, but he'd also squabbled with the team over money for a few years. The Ravens landed Sharpe for a four-year, $13.8 million deal that had a $4.5 million signing bonus. (I got those numbers from Pro Football Weekly.) Sharpe lasted only two years in Baltimore before being cut for salary-cap reasons. It's been seven years, but Graham making that much more than Sharpe is insane.

Comments

John said…
That comparison between Graham's deal and Sharpe's deal is just mind-boggling. I know the NFL raised the cap this year, but this is just out of control. Some of this is starting to look like the football version of signing a defense-averse second baseman with the arm accuracy of Jeff George to $136 million (ahem, Soriano).

I am excited about Graham as well. I think he was underutilized in New England not only because of the emergence of other receivers but also by the Patriots' style of play (a lot of two tight end sets and infrequent play calling to the tight end). He has the body and the hands to patrol the middle and be a sure-handed option for Cutler, which we desperately need with the aging of Rod Smith.
Mike said…
The biggest problem I have with the deal is the money, of course, though I think I'm a little less excited about Graham in general.

I have no idea if we'll regret the deal because I don't know what the cap's going to look like in a few years. Will salaries escalate at the same rate, or is this the one-year abberation that teams hope it is? It's tough to judge contracts because they're so crazy this year...but we still probably overpaid by at least a bit.

If I was going to criticize Soriano for anything, it'd be his near-comical tendency to swing at everything, though he actually walked a bunch last year.
David said…
funny that you guys remember him being a solid blocker... i remember him being the guy who made bobby pasevento look like a solid pocket passer.

anyone who could do that (insert some fancy euphemism).

seriously though, he was so impressive he beat out shockey for whatever award that is that they win for being the best TE, not to mention, he had buttery soft hands and was a pretty adroit runner downfield. reminded me a lot of shannon sharpe.

it is worth questioning how he will perform in this system considering he came to the league with such accolades, although i too echo the comments that he never got a fare look as the premier TE, starting out he was playing under ben winter coates if i'm not mistaken.

if he could hit the potential that he seemed to have in college, this could be a great deal.

chances are - well... about as good as belicheck (sp?) not looking like a hobo on opening day with his stretched out sweatshirt and 3/4 sleeves his wife made for him
Mike said…
Not that it much matters, but Coates, who played with Sharpe on the Ravens' championship team, was gone by the time Graham hit New England. Ben Watson, though, has cut in to Graham's PT in recent years.

Part of the reason the team used a first-rounder on another tight end in Watson had to be disappointment in Graham, so I hope we're not all kidding ourselves here.
David said…
ben watson, ben coates... whatever.

re: not kidding ourselves

true, bike mike shanahan was the first to be duped

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...