Skip to main content

Broncos get Daniel Graham

The Broncos signed tight end Daniel Graham, formerly of the New England Patriots and a one-time University of Colorado star, to a five-year, $30 million contract with $15 million in guarantees.

The length of the deal is kind of a funny conicidence, because five years is exactly how long it's been since I would have cared that the Broncos acquired Graham.

Admittedly, I'm excited. The first time I saw Graham play live, my brother ("John" in the comments) told me to keep an eye on him. Glad I did. He was incredible! Not only was Graham one of CU's finest blockers (back then, that meant something), he was easily its most clutch receiver. I left that game knowing he'd be a star.

As a pro, Graham has 1,393 receiving yards. That's not last year. Not in his best year. But in his entire five-year career. What happened? I don't really know. He had some problems with drops for a while, but he just never became a central part of the Patriots' offense. Instead, guys like Deion Branch emerged as Tom Brady's favored targets. (Graham won some nice jewelry with New England, so I doubt he's too upset about how life turned out.)

As anyone watching Tony Scheffler last year learned, the Broncos will never hesitate to throw to a tight end, no matter how many passes he drops. Graham could end up a pretty good pick-up; I just can't believe the money everyone is throwing around.

Some historical persepctive: After the 1999 season, the Broncos let the game's premier tight end, Shannon Sharpe, go to the Ravens. Sharpe was returning from a broken collarbone suffered the season before, but he'd also squabbled with the team over money for a few years. The Ravens landed Sharpe for a four-year, $13.8 million deal that had a $4.5 million signing bonus. (I got those numbers from Pro Football Weekly.) Sharpe lasted only two years in Baltimore before being cut for salary-cap reasons. It's been seven years, but Graham making that much more than Sharpe is insane.

Comments

John said…
That comparison between Graham's deal and Sharpe's deal is just mind-boggling. I know the NFL raised the cap this year, but this is just out of control. Some of this is starting to look like the football version of signing a defense-averse second baseman with the arm accuracy of Jeff George to $136 million (ahem, Soriano).

I am excited about Graham as well. I think he was underutilized in New England not only because of the emergence of other receivers but also by the Patriots' style of play (a lot of two tight end sets and infrequent play calling to the tight end). He has the body and the hands to patrol the middle and be a sure-handed option for Cutler, which we desperately need with the aging of Rod Smith.
Mike said…
The biggest problem I have with the deal is the money, of course, though I think I'm a little less excited about Graham in general.

I have no idea if we'll regret the deal because I don't know what the cap's going to look like in a few years. Will salaries escalate at the same rate, or is this the one-year abberation that teams hope it is? It's tough to judge contracts because they're so crazy this year...but we still probably overpaid by at least a bit.

If I was going to criticize Soriano for anything, it'd be his near-comical tendency to swing at everything, though he actually walked a bunch last year.
David said…
funny that you guys remember him being a solid blocker... i remember him being the guy who made bobby pasevento look like a solid pocket passer.

anyone who could do that (insert some fancy euphemism).

seriously though, he was so impressive he beat out shockey for whatever award that is that they win for being the best TE, not to mention, he had buttery soft hands and was a pretty adroit runner downfield. reminded me a lot of shannon sharpe.

it is worth questioning how he will perform in this system considering he came to the league with such accolades, although i too echo the comments that he never got a fare look as the premier TE, starting out he was playing under ben winter coates if i'm not mistaken.

if he could hit the potential that he seemed to have in college, this could be a great deal.

chances are - well... about as good as belicheck (sp?) not looking like a hobo on opening day with his stretched out sweatshirt and 3/4 sleeves his wife made for him
Mike said…
Not that it much matters, but Coates, who played with Sharpe on the Ravens' championship team, was gone by the time Graham hit New England. Ben Watson, though, has cut in to Graham's PT in recent years.

Part of the reason the team used a first-rounder on another tight end in Watson had to be disappointment in Graham, so I hope we're not all kidding ourselves here.
David said…
ben watson, ben coates... whatever.

re: not kidding ourselves

true, bike mike shanahan was the first to be duped

Popular posts from this blog

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...