Skip to main content

Two series down


Enjoy the highlights, including Kenyon Martin's last-minute dunk that had Mark Cuban's name written all over it.

Never in my wildest dreams did I think before this postseason that the Nuggets were going to the Western Conference Finals. Even with that No. 2 seed, I would’ve settled for getting out of the first round and then losing to the Spurs. Now, of course, my dreams just keep getting crazier.

It was a tense closeout game, as those games tend to be. I didn’t get a single phone call, text, or game-related e-mail during the proceedings, and only sent one e-mail myself. I’m not sure all the fear was deserved, especially when Carmelo get off to a torrid start in the first half, scoring 21 on 9-of-11 shooting from the field. Can you believe a year ago the rumors were that the Nuggets were looking to trade Melo? (Charles Barkley just called him the best scorer in the NBA right now…how awesome is that?)

Unlike the Hornets, the Mavericks didn’t quit, but outside of Dirk Nowitzki and free throw attempt specialist Brandon Bass, was anyone memorable? One stood out to me tonight. In the first quarter Jason Kidd hit a three-pointer near the sideline, and the announcer called him “deadly”. This was Kidd’s first three, and I’m like, who gets called deadly for one shot? Kidd went on to make several long jumpers, but it made me think. The guy’s a career .402 shooter and hits just 34.2% from three land. He has terrific hands, balance, coordination, and was in great shape as a young man. And he’s a guard. So how come he never learned how to shoot? He’s had a very good career…but I can’t help how great it could have been with a little more time spent on his shot.

This may not make sense to anyone else right now, but it reminded me, briefly, of Kobe Bryant, who of course may be playing us in the conference finals. Here’s the thing I think: the all-time great players are the ones with the discipline to complete their game, to develop their weaknesses into strengths. Often, they have a secondary skill they can rely on that’s better than almost everyone else’s best talent. When Michael Jordan couldn’t score, which was almost never, he could fall back on his standing as the greatest defensive guard in the game and still have a huge impact. Larry Bird was a fearless scorer but also one of the greatest passers ever. Tim Duncan’s a great post player and passer who keyed several championship offenses, but in his prime he was so skilled on the boards he could dominate a game with his rebounding. And so on. And did any of these guys have a notable weakness, especially one that was relevant to their position? I can’t think of one. Which is why I’m bothered when guys like Kidd are placed in that rare air…because most of the transcendent greats took the game too seriously to have such a glaring weakness like Kidd’s shooting. The best example of the decade, of course, is Steve Nash and his complete inability to play defense, which is why he never should have won the MVP trophy. Anyway, what’s Kobe’s second skill, other than the ability to buy into his own hype? He gets credit for being a great defender, but like Derek Jeter, I don’t see it. If Kobe was great as everyone says he is, he’d do more on the court, as crazy as that sounds. And that’s why I’m not afraid of the Lakers.

But enough about the other teams, because tonight belongs to the Nuggets. I almost got chills watching Chauncey Billups in his postgame interview, where he was all business and knew now is not the time to celebrate. I love that guy and that attitude. And if you judge him by the standard of the last paragraph, he’s an athlete who’s made the most of his talent. I just can’t wait to enjoy the next part of the ride.

Comments

John said…
That was another great game. Billups and Melo got it done again. My favorite play was Melo's turnaround 3 in the fourth quarter as the shot clock expired - he was simply cold-hearted. What I love about this team is its toughness and poise: it used to be that a tense game like that would never go our way, and now they ALL seem to.

Billups obviously had been the X-factor this year, and showed up big again. His maturity and leadership are rubbing off on Melo, which will pay dividends for our franchise for years to come.

I agree with you about one-dimensional guys, and love a player like Billups who gets the most out of his talent. (Chris Andersen fits in that category as well in my mind.) The whole game I was actually feeling a little bad for Dirk - he is a great scorer but is stuck trying to get it done with a team of conscripts.

I am not afraid of the Lakers or anyone else with the kind of swagger and confidence we are playing with right now . . .
Mike said…
Okay, first off, I fixed the highlights. (Thanks to ESPN for giving you the embed code and then killing the video by the next morning. Frigtards.)

Yeah, Dirk's kinda getting screwed; I don't like the pieces they have around him. I wonder if he'll still be in his prime when they figure it out. I was impressed with the series he had.

Carmelo's three was great...I did not expect us to get that clean of a shot off, but he nailed it. I was hoping he'd get the ball and it's cool to see he's a good enough outside shooter that the team trusts him there.

Just for the record, I didn't mean to say Kobe is one-dimensional, just that his secondary dimensions are notably worse than his scoring.
blaine said…
That was a terrific close-out game for the Nuggets last night. I would argue that every win after last night becomes the biggest win in Nuggets' history. I wish the Nuggets would have played a little better D, but I almost feel guilty complaining about anything now that we are moving on to the Western Conference Finals.

My favorite play was Melo's Dr. J-like scoop finger-roll past Dirk. I think we as Nuggets fans have already known how great of a scorer Melo is, but it is great to hear Barkley and other recognize Melo as the great player that he is. After his performance thus far in the playoffs it is laughable that he didn't get an allstar spot. If Melo's D continues to improve I think he can be as good as LeBron and Kobe.

I think the Nuggets will get by the Lakers in the next round. Actually, I'm more worried about the Cavs right now than the Lakers. The Lakers propensity for not showing up for long stretches during games will really hurt them against Denver's explosive offense. Yesterday I even heard Colin Cowherd predict the Nuggets would beat the Lakers in the next round.

I agree with you on Kidd and another example of a one-dimensional player is Shaq. Instead of making horrible rap albums and playing a genie in an equally horrible movie, Shaq should have spent time working on his free throw shooting. Imagine how many more points he would have scored in his career if he was at least a 70% free throw shooter. I hate the excuse that big men just can't shoot free throws. Being tall hasn't affected Yao Ming or Dirk Nowitzki's free throw shooting ability.
Mike said…
I knew someone would bring up Shaq at the line. I think this article gives what I consider a plausible explanation for his woes from the foul stripe, and his touch on other shots. (Skip to page 11 if you're lazy.)

I wouldn't worry about the D; we've just been spoiled in previous home games. The Birdman didn't do nearly as much last night as he has been, though.

I do think the Cavs are the most dangerous team in the league right now; LeBron just looks unstoppable.
blaine said…
I never knew that about his wrist. I suppose that it is plausible that his wrist is fused. If that's really true it would change my whole perception of Shaq. That was an excellent article by the way.
Mike said…
Well, Shaq could still take a granny shot or shoot them left-handed, so it's not a perfect excuse. And I don't think he was really a great player until he had Phil Jackson pushing him, and his prime was sort of short, but he was absolutely a great player. I think you have to go with him or Tim Duncan as best player of this decade.
blaine said…
This is off-topic, but I would like your opinion on Phil Jackson.

How can he let a team that is suppose to be competing for a championship lose by 12 in game 4, win by 40 in game 6 and then get destroyed last night? It's obvious that the Lakers are more talented, so really it comes down to a lack of desire or focus right? Isn't that the coaches responsibility to have his team prepared to play? Jackson has never won a championship without having the most dominant player in the league, so is he overrated or is he really the Zen-Master?
Mike said…
Phil Jackson is a fantastic coach, and most coaches only get titles when they have the best player in the league, so I don't fault him for that. And the Lakers are talented, but they're not THAT much more talented than the Rockets, I think.

I believe I saw/heard the Sports Guy say recently that Jackson is just hanging on trying to break Auerbach's record but has kind of mailed it in; that looks kind of accurate since I've heard it. Problem is I've been reading some of his archives and listening to his podcasts so I have no idea where he said it...could've been a recent column, too.
Anonymous said…
Nuggets move on and get a little more rest than I expected. Losing again to the Rockets shows some weaknesses, although Brooks and can shoot some sweet threes.

I think we can take either team, I know we can defend the three so that takes care of the Rockets and hitting the three seems to eliminate the Lakers.

As for the Cavs Lebron is rediculous, but in watching some of their games I can't see that any of the teams they faced have played D with any sense of urgency. If we make it to the finals with the cavs that will be the best Defence they've seen and who knows what that will mean?

Go NUGGS! Now do I get tickets to game 6? Or will the series last that long? Maybe game 4? You in Mikey?

LT
blaine said…
Well, if he has "mailed it in" during this series against the Rockets then I would think that would take away from his legacy wouldn't it? He is the highest paid coach in the league and supposedly one of the best of all time right? I just think if he really is as good as a coach as everyone says then he would NEVER just mail in a playoff game, let alone a playoff series. Hearing him speak in the after-game interviews he almost sounds defensive. Instead of taking some responsibility for the loss last night he was talking about how his team was fatigued and that his player's shots just weren't falling. It just doesn't seem like he has the characteristics of the greatest NBA coach ever.
Mike said…
LT, and anyone else, of course I'm down for any game.

I think we could at least challenge the Cavs, which is more than other playoff opponents can say so far.

Blaine, you're probably right, but of course it's possible he was a great coach and then became lazy as he got older. I don't recall him ever taking responsibility for a loss but part of his whole thing is being the calm voice of reason, so I'm not so surprised to hear him explain a loss away like that. And he's always loved tweaking the media. I think you raise an interesting question about how bad a guy has to be before it starts counting against him...i.e., can Brett Favre play himself out of the Hall of Fame, for instance? I don't know how I feel about that.
blaine said…
I think Brett Favre might be a bad example. He's set so many NFL records that regardless of how may INTs he throws he will still get in. Players often have a dramatic drop off in production at some point (Jerry Rice, Joe Montana, etc.) but that is because their success is tied to the health and ability of their bodies. A coach doesn't have that restriction, so, in my opinion, we should't see a decline in performance.
Anonymous said…
So much for tickets, now we need to make the finals!

LT
Mike said…
Okay, I don't think Favre WILL play his way out, just using him as a contemporary example of someone hanging on too long. I guess pro sports are usually too much of a meritocracy to let a guy play badly enough to wipe out that good, but if a player has a below-average year that should count against him, right?

We shouldn't see Jackson decline, but how else can we explain it? Oh, it makes sense he wouldn't try considering how much he sold out when he came back to coach Kobe. I thought he had valued teamwork?

Man, those tickets make me sad...

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...