Skip to main content

Nuggets lose Game Five

I won’t say the series is over, but tonight’s game, a 103-94 victory by the L.A. Lakers over the Denver Nuggets, really hurt.

I’d been nervous all day; I guess as a Broncos fan I don’t remember what deep playoff runs feel like. While Game Four was a game we had to win, it felt coming into tonight that our best shot of taking the series was to win Game Five, too. Surely the Lakers knew this and stepped up with their best effort of the series. It was their one good effort for a few players. It’s annoying how guys like Lamar Odom will get praised for this game.

The start of the fourth quarter is obviously where we lost the game, but the Lakers outplayed the Nuggets for most of the game, even in the tied first half. It was kind of like how some of our games with the Hornets played out: we controlled the tempo, and were clearly dominating, but didn’t have an actual lead yet. Tonight the Lakers did the same to us. They played just hard enough on defense to keep our shooters from developing any kind of rhythm. Why they don’t play like that all the time, I couldn’t tell you, but they clearly went all-out tonight and played well from start to finish. Man, I hate those guys.

The Nuggets’ backs are against the wall. Last time that happened, after Game Three, they responded with a huge home victory. Let’s hope they can unleash the running game at the Pepsi Center Friday night (7 pm Mountain, ESPN).

Comments

blaine said…
Wow, watching the Nuggets fall apart midway through the third quarter was torture.

It seems like all year J.R. and Billups have been able to hit their open Js but for some reason they just aren't falling in this series. I would credit the Lakers' D, but it seemed like most of shots they missed were good, open looks.

Nene's sixth foul was totally bogus, but really I guess the game was pretty much over by that point. Nene wasn't really doing much for us anyway. He couldn't score (and missed two really easy layups) and he allowed stupid Odom to get 14 freaking rebounds last night.
John said…
This was a tough loss - while I don't think the game was a must-win, it was pivotal for the series. The big difference to me in this one was that the Lakers took advantage of opportunities down the stretch, and we didn't.

The other thing that worries me is that the Lakers adopted the game plan I was afraid they would use for the entire series: posting up and making the most of their height advantage inside. I am afraid we don't have a good answer to that strategy on defense.

Lamar Odom was getting way too much credit for finally showing up. At one point in the fourth quarter one of the commentators said something like "this is what Lamar Odom does every night," in direct contradiction of 7.5 ppg in the first 4 games of the series.
Mike said…
Ha ha, yeah! I think that was traitorous ex-Nug Mark Jackson. Yeah, Lamar Odom does this every night--why do you have to tell us that, then? Eventually he said this is what's expected of Odom, and I was like, maybe that's true, but even by now you should stop expecting it.

The Lakers have a huge edge inside, just like they did last year in the series. It's a shame Nene is our only real post defender. Gasol's shiftiness makes him a bad matchup for the Birdman.

Smith and Billups were getting open looks, I suppose, but they weren't as open as the first two series, and LA closed on shooters with some urgency. I don't know what Smith caught before this series but he hasn't been himself, though of course he's had flashes.
John said…
It ordinarily is hard to hear Mark Jackson's cogent analysis in between Jeff Van Gundy's rote compliments to the officials for clear no-calls, but that one came through loud and clear. Someday the NBA will finally realize that Odom is a second-rate player at best, even though he got paid like an All-Star in college.

The Lakers' post presence has been a major issue, even in earlier games when it showed up on the glass instead of in the scoring column. To me, it speaks volumes of Phil Jackson's perceptiveness that he benched Andrew Bynum when the game mattered most.

Smith has had a rough series, and unlike unsual, it seems to be in his head now.
Anonymous said…
I've enjoyed watching the Nuggs this late in the season, but I really didn't want a 7 game series, which may or may not happen after Friday.

I thought that was the Lakers best showing for whole series and unfortunatly we went cold at the wrong time. This whole series has been the worst 3 point shooting I've seen from the Nuggs which hasn't helped at all. Even Billups seemed out of sorts last night.

At this point we have to recover and get our "swagger" back on Friday cause unless we really put them away by ten points or more in the Staples Center we're in big trouble on Game 7.

I have to give Kleiza props, he was playing aggressive he just lacked the exprience of being on the court that late in the game, with some more confidence he could be huge.

LT
DG said…
What frustrated me was how little Nene and K-Mart did during the 4th quarter. Nothing they shot went in.

Look, if we get seven Nugs in double figure range on offense again, like game 4, what LA's big men do inside won't matter. It shouldn't have mattered last night. Although, I will say that I'm not convinced this double-teaming of Kobe is right when they seem so slow to cover the back door . . .
Mike said…
Yeah, John, Smith's confidence seems shaky, which is something I never would have thought possible.

I think swagger is huge, because we didn't have enough energy or hustle last night, and no momentum whatsoever carried over from Game Four. I think we have to count on more than just making more shots...we weren't always getting the greatest shots, I thought.

Kleiza is pretty talented offensively but I just worry about him being a go-to guy in the fourth. I'd rather lose because Carmelo or Chauncey missed. That said he helped us claw back into it, kind of.

Dave, you're right, and I think it's all about pace. When we're the aggressors, their big men disappear. When we're not, they dominate.

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...