Skip to main content

Lakers win Game Five

The Lakers just pulled out a sloppy Game Five win over the Celtics. The Celtics lead the series 3-2.

From what I saw, a.k.a. the second half, the Lakers were sort of lucky to win, but the Celtics certainly didn't play well enough to close out a championship series on the road.

I think it would be inaccurate to say the Celtics relaxed after their huge comeback a game ago. It was more that they just blew the opportunities they had in this game to take control. The biggest example came with 2:31 remaining, with the Lakers leading 95-93. Pau Gasol, going for an offensive rebound, went over the back on Kevin Garnett. So Garnett got two foul shots and a chance to tie the game, but he missed both. It was stuff like that. Boston's defense was solid enough, but their offense needed work.

The Lakers played solidly enough to defend their home court. Kobe Bryant had another poor shooting night, finishing 8-for-21. (And he made his last two shots, meaning at one point he was identical to the previous game's 6-for-19.) He did poke the ball away from Paul Pierce, then caught a long pass from Lamar Odom for a breakaway dunk, at a key point late in the game. Nevertheless Michele Tafoya was unashamed to praise him in the postgame interview for being the man who made the win possible.

The rest of the Lakers played all right, I suppose. Lamar Odom appeared ready to throw down with James Posey at one point in the fourth when Posey fouled him hard after a whistle; sort of reminded you which of the pair had had the focus to win a ring already. Pau Gasol did a terrific job maintaining his obnoxious, whiny look when he didn't like a call. So grating. Derek Fisher was solid and fills his role well, but he wasn't exactly shooting the lights out in the fourth quarter. If both teams give the same effort in the next game, which I sort of hope doesn't happen (this wasn't really a great game to watch), the change in venues could be enough to yield Boston the championship. While all I really want is a trophy presentation Tuesday night, hopefully Game Six is more entertaining.

P.S. It's friggin' hilarious in my book that "Knick" Bavetta reffed tonight's game and the Lakers won, but there was absolutely nothing fishy about the officiating.

Comments

blaine said…
I agree, last nights game was pretty boring. Even when Boston made it's comeback in the fourth quarter last night, it's not like they did it by playing championship basketball. Really, it just looked like the Lakers were playing terrible and not executing any type of offense.

After watching the last two games I feel like the Celtics just want to win more than the Lakers do. How else can you explain losing a 24 point lead, a 19 point lead, and then a 14 point lead in the forth quarter last night?
John said…
My take exactly. I watched the first quarter, which ended 39-22 in favor of the Lakers. My response was to think: "Oh, well, where have we seen this before?" I wouldn't have been surprised regardless of how the game turned out, mostly because I think it is difficult to win two road games in a row in the NBA finals. Again, the fact that the Celtics were even close in this game after playing so poorly (just like game 3) shows how much better they are than the Lakers.

Plus, having Perkins sitting out definitely hurt the Celtics' interior depth, which has been one of their biggest advantages in this series.
Mike said…
You know, that's an interesting question. I think L.A.'s problem isn't desire so much as reliance on guys who, outside of Kobe Bryant and Derek Fisher, don't have true crunch-time experience, and don't really know how to hold on to leads in games like this. Lamar Odom doesn't seem to play any differently regardless of game situation. Gasol, too, disappears for stretches. If only they had a coach who knew how to reach players in a time like this...

Neither team has been forged into a contender over years of playoff battles as Finals teams often are, but at least the Celtics have three guys who've each had to carry a team's playoff hopes in the past.
Mike said…
I'm with you, John, on the difficulty of winning road games like this. The Lakers' victory wasn't commanding enough to make me think anything has really changed in the series.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...