Skip to main content

Nuggets not trading Anthony (?)

I don't know whether to be excited or horrified.

Calvin Andrews, the agent for Denver Nuggets star Carmelo Anthony, said today that the team has assured him that they will not trade Anthony.

Anthony has been the subject of trade rumors since the Nuggets' season ended with a quick first-round playoff exit. In his five seasons with Denver, the team has never made it past the first round of the playoffs.

To put that in perspective, the team didn't even make the playoffs for eight years before Anthony arrived, part of a span in which the team reached the postseason only twice in thirteen seasons.

That's why I'm only slightly disappointed the Nuggets haven't done better, even with the addition of future Hall of Fame guard Allen Iverson. The scars of an 11-71 season (1997-98) run deep.

The reason I'm scared, though, is this sentence from the article:

Anthony, who does not want to be traded, is bothered by his name being mentioned in rumors and upset because the Nuggets have not come out publicly and denounced a possible trade, the sources said.

Makes sense to me. And now that I think about it, the Nuggets still haven't come out publicly and denounced a possible trade. I can't help but wonder if the team is trying to keep its options open. (After all, if they do trade him but only lied to 'Melo and his agent, who's really going to care?)

I absolutely do not want the Nuggets to trade Anthony. He's 24, scores in bunches, and is improving his all-around game, particularly his rebounding. Because of age (he's almost nine years younger than Iverson), he's the most valuable/important player on the Nuggets' roster. Think about it: he'll be the age Iverson is now in 2017. There's no way the Nuggets can get fair value for that many (potentially) prime years.

Furthermore, though Iverson recently decided not to opt out of his contract, it runs for just one more year. If the Nuggets trade Carmelo and don't get better, would Iverson even consider re-signing with Denver?

The Nuggets of the nineties were as bad as they were in large part because of the terrific players they let get away. Please don't take us back to the way we were.

I close with two quotes about Carmelo. First, the remarkably-optimistic words of Bill Simmons, who wrote recently:

Before the Nuggets trade Carmelo Anthony this summer -- and it sure seems like we're headed that way -- they better take a long look at the way Pierce performed in these playoffs. Then they should remember how many ups and downs Pierce had over the past few years, how many times Boston fans wondered if he'd ever "get it," how many times he acted like a kook or a head case and how many times they discussed trading him. (During the summer of '05, they had a deal in place with Portland for the No. 3 pick and Nick Van Exel's contract that Pierce squashed after the trade was leaked to the media. The guy Boston would have taken with that pick? Chris Paul. A fascinating "What if?") In my humble opinion, if 'Melo ever matures as a person and a player -- and that seems like a fair bet -- he could have the same all-around impact on a contender that Pierce had on these 2008 Celtics.

Or, as Pierce himself told the Denver Post:

"Well, I never have gotten a DUI," Pierce said Saturday with a smile, "but I guess you can say there were similarities. A 6-8 forward who can go inside and outside. Still learning the game. He's still a young player and has a lot more room for improvement. The way he's looking, the way he started his career, he can be a lot better than me when he's all said and done."

Comments

blaine said…
Great post Mike, I agree. There's no way you can allow a player as good as Melo to get away. I'm assuming the Nuggets' brass are smart enough to know that there's no way they could get equal value for Melo, but then again, it IS the Nuggets.

Melo certainly has his faults, (he could certainly exert more energy on defense) but I wonder how much of the blame does Karl deserve? How much time do the Nuggets spend working on defense in practices? When is Karl going to get tough again and be willing to bench his starters when they don't hustle? (One thing I think is interesting is that Karl seems to have no reservations in jumping all over J.R. when he makes a bad decision or doesn't hustle and will quickly bench him, but he doesn't have that same mentality with his other players.)

If the Nuggets were going to try to trade someone, I think it should be Iverson. As much as I like watching him play, he will be a free agent at the end of next year and as each year passes AI loses more and more trade value as he gets older and older.
Mike said…
It's hilarious how true that is about Karl. J.R. Smith gets yanked around all the time (when I see him, he's usually playing hard), but Carmelo doesn't the way he used to. To be fair, Carmelo is improving, but it is weird how little regard Smith gets.

I'd hate to lose Iverson, and I wonder how much trade value he has even now. I think he'll stay in Denver even after his contract is up, but it's something to watch.

Popular posts from this blog

The NFL hates you.

It's no joke. It seems like the more devoted of a fan you are, the less the league cares about your continued patronage. The best example is the league's blackout policy, a wonderful gift from the league to its teams granting them added market pressure to charge whatever ridiculous amount they want for tickets. If a game doesn't sell out, the home market doesn't get to watch it on TV. (Basically, a 75-mile radius around the stadium doesn't get to see the game on TV if all the tickets aren’t bought first.) The NFL, like a needy girlfriend, says, "Hey, fans, you like us? Prove it." Then the league asks us to prove it again and again, week after week, year after year. I live within 75 miles of what should be John Elway Stadium, but Broncos fans are pretty much shielded from this stuff, right? Not all of them. One of my friends is as supportive a fan as the NFL can have: he's a Broncos season ticket holder and an NFL Sunday Ticket subscriber. That mean...

An innocent mistake

Sorry. Here I am to catch up on a few things from the past week... 1. Vince Young will be on the cover of Madden 08. Good for him, I guess. Much is made of the Madden curse. It's not a self-fulfilling prophecy, but it almost feels like one. The real problem is that a) football is a very violent game, and b) Electronic Arts typically selects a cover athlete who's already very well-known. Unfortunately, the players are therefore often a year (Shaun Alexander) or more (Ray Lewis) off their actual prime, and old enough that a serious injury is more likely. Young is an up-and-comer, and to avoid a horrible pun let's just say he has less age than most of those guys. I think he'll be fine. 2. Of course, the reason EA went with such a youthful player is that superstar Chargers back LaDainian Tomlinson turned them down . Why? Money. No surprise that'd be a point of contention, considering how "generous" EA is with its regular employees . 3. That's why re...

Super Bowl XLVI revealed!

The Patriots and the Giants. Things just work out sometimes. * * * Two new teams, the England Patriots and the York Giants, will play for the NFL title in Super Bowl Forty-Six in two weeks. I can't wait. The matchup comes too late, and after too imperfect of a season, to make up for the wounds inflicted by the Giants in early 2008. The Patriots' undefeated season, a 16-0 masterpiece in which they set the league's single-season scoring record, broke at the hands of the upstart Giants in that year's Super Bowl. The way the Giants won made their win feel especially flukish...Eli Manning, known more for his entitled attitude than his athleticism (the only player to which his moves have ever been compared favorably is his brother Peyton), somehow scrambled free of a Patriot pass rush in the closing minutes, and lofted a pass down the middle of the field to David Tyree, who caught the key throw against the top of his helmet. Then a touchdown pass to Plexiglass provided the wi...