Skip to main content

Celtics-Lakers: I Might be the Only Guy Who Doesn't Care

The NBA Finals are set, and in several days they'll even begin. The match-up, of course, is a classic: the Boston Celtics and the Los Angeles Lakers.

The Celtics and Lakers have met in the Finals 10 times. The rivalry is best-known today for Larry Bird and Magic Johnson's encounters in the 1980s, though they only faced each other for the championship three times, with the Lakers winning twice. But the Bill Russell/Sam Jones-era Celtics faced the Lakers seven times in the Finals (including in 1959, when the Lakers were still in Minneapolis), with the Celtics winning every single time. And yet Jerry West is the guy who ended up with the "Mr. Clutch" nickname and his silhouette on the NBA logo.

West did win the first-ever Finals MVP award in 1969, which made sense, because even though the Lakers as always lost to the Celtics, at least they dragged it out to seven games that time.

That series is one of my favorite Finals ever. Though the Celtics had beaten the Lakers in the Finals the year before, they were getting old: it would be the last season for Russell and Jones. The Lakers had the homecourt advantage for Game Seven and, anticipating a victory, owner Jack Kent Cooke had thousands of balloons hanging from the ceiling, waiting to be dropped when the Lakers won. The Celtics, as proven as proven winners come (Russell already ten rings at this point; Jones had nine) were incensed and jumped out to a quick lead. Though the game was close at the end, the Celtics held on to win the championship. See awesome quotes from Red Auerbach in this story on NBA.com, and from Bill Russell in this Wikipedia article. (There's no source for those quotes that I can see, but I swear NBA.com used to have an awesome interview with Russell where he talked about that series and the balloons, but I can't find it.)

That's history. And Bird and Magic you know about, too. (I think I heard Bird say once that he considered Philadelphia to be Boston's true rival in his early years, though.) Terrific players, outstanding teams, and fantastic games. This year what do we get? Kobe Bryant and Kevin Garnett.

No disrespect to those players—actually, yeah, a very slight disrespect intended. Garnett's fierce, a great worker, and one of the most memorable players of this era; Kobe perhaps even more so. But has either one reached the Bird/Magic level of greatness, let alone the Russell stratosphere? With a ring or two of his own, Kobe could perhaps belong in the picture near Magic, though let's see him earn it first.

Will Kobe get that ring? The odds are probably in his favor. The Lakers have the best player and coach in the series, a formula that's helped the Bulls, Spurs, Lakers, and Heat win titles in recent years. The only recent exception is the Detroit Pistons, who interestingly were aided by Kobe's selfishness/overconfidence, though I don't anticipate that being a problem this year. There's a ton on the line for Kobe—only the validation of his whole career, if the Lakers win—and he'll relish the opportunity.

The Celtics have a chance, too (they won more games than the Lakers this year), and I'll be pulling for them like crazy. I think a lot of their hope comes down to what Paul Pierce can accomplish. He's a talented enough player, and a basketball junkie by all accounts, that he could be the X-factor Boston needs to counter Kobe. He's surely fired up for his big chance, as well. I hope to see Garnett play well on the game's biggest stage, too. But that won't make him Kevin McHale.

This could be a terrific series; just don't expect the franchises involved (the laundry, as Jerry Seinfeld would say) to have much to do with it.

Comments

blaine said…
This finals match-up is my worst nightmare come true.

I detest Kobe and I've never liked the Celtics which makes this finals showdown nearly unwatchable for me. I suppose my hatred of Kobe is slightly stronger than for the Celtics, so I will be pulling for Boston. I would really like to see Pierce get a ring (I could care less about KG and Allen).

The best way for this series to end up would be for Kobe to try to take over and stop sharing the ball, and consequently lose the series for the Lakers. More than anything, that's what I'm hoping for.
John said…
I couldn't agree more with your take on these finals. To me, this year's Lakers-Celtics match-up shows how far the NBA still has to go to reclaim its former glory (not, as some pundits have suggested, how far it has come this season). And I haven't even been alive long enough to have seen many of those historic finals.

That all said, I hope the Celtics beat the tar out of the Lakers (although I suspect the opposite is more likely, for the reasons you mention). I hate Kobe and Phil Jackson, would love to see Garnett win one, and would love even more to hear Kobe demanding a trade in the post-game press conference right after he loses the series on a last-second miss.
Mike said…
Blaine, I think like John I'd be a little happier for KG than Paul Pierce, just because he's had a better career, though I think some criticism of him is justified. I like Pierce, though, and do remember saying the Nuggets should draft him in '98. Actually I was a huge Vince Carter supporter, so what do I know, but once they zeroed in on Raef LaFrentz because they needed a center, I figured why not take his Kansas teammate who'd had better rebounding numbers and make him play center? Anyway, I agree that I'd love that outcome.

John, the more I think about it the better I feel about Boston's chances. They did have a great season and the Lakers get a ton of pub just for being the Lakers, which is odd because that only makes them maybe the second-best franchise in NBA history. I also think the longer the layoff (and six days or whatever is long to me), the better for Boston because Kobe will spend all week ruminating on his greatness.

I loved Phil Jackson with the Bulls but he was probably just as egotistical then. Guess it helped him to have such a likable star.

I also like your demanding a trade reference. Sportswriters get a lot of crap for having bad predictions, especially when they've "never played the game". But has anyone ever been as spectacularly wrong about a season as Kobe was about the Lakers this year? Granted this came before the Gasol trade but still, they were fine without him.

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...