Skip to main content

Great upsets

I don't like to brag much, but at one point this weekend in my family's bracket challenge on ESPN, my five bracket entires held the bottom five spots in the lineup of fourteen, which I assume is why no one reads this blog.

While I missed a ton of basketball this weekend, I did get to see much of my favorite game: West Virginia over Duke. I hate Duke and it's always fun to see them fail, though perhaps it would have been more fun had Preakness University done the honors in the first round. I don't really care for Bob Huggins, either, except that now I think he deserves a 200-foot statue and a place in the Hall of Fame.

To be fair, these program schools are a little odd. Beating Duke this year isn't like beating Jason Williams/Shane Battier Duke, and it's nothing like beating Trajan Langdon/Elton Brand Duke. In retrospect the Blue Devils were a pretty good team, but not really championship material. The odd thing about watching the West Virginia game was that I kept expecting Duke to make some kind of run, and they simply couldn't. How far the mighty have fallen, at least for now, and how sweet it is.

Also exciting is Georgetown's loss today to Davidson. Next weekend I have to catch me some Stephen Curry. Georgetown's loss left my brackets in tatters, too, but who freaking cares? The whole point of the opening weekend is watching high-seeded teams fall flat on their face, and if you get some great individual performances, too, that's all the better.

And finally, I guess a No. 6 should lose to a No. 3, but I'm still pleased that Oklahoma managed to fall short by so much (by 30 points to Louisville, a small town near my home). I absolutely can't stand Oklahoma, and I hate their basketball team as much as their football team, which is rare for me. The University of Utah is probably the only other school to inspire that kind of feeling from me. I mean I don't like Nebraska's hoops team, but I don't have to hear about them, either.

What did y'all think of the weekend?

Comments

John said…
I agree on all fronts. With Duke's FIRST round loss last year, they are starting to look like the overhyped chumps they always have been. I really wish Belmont/Preakness would have pulled it out in the first round, but I will take what I can get.

All of DC is reeling over the G-town loss . . . I thought they were overrated, but I thought they would last at least until the Sweet Sixteen. I wonder if this means Nike will be pulling their John Thompson/John Thompson III ads with the tagline: "There are no Cinderellas."

And watching Oklahoma get obliterated in any sport is worth the price of admission.

Overall, the weekend was solid, although I expect Davidson and Villanova to run their course next weekend. And North Carolina looked absolutely dominant, albeit against the likes of the Smoky Hill Institute of Technology.
9:57 AM
Mike said…
You know, Duke barely winning one game isn't nearly as bad as losing in the very next round. It's not rare for even a title-winning team to have at least one really close call, but the good teams bounce back. Duke didn't really bounce back at all, which just goes to show exactly what you said. And while I don't follow them that closely, I haven't heard of any Jason Williams-like recruits on the horizon who are supposed to turn it around for them.

Even I saw that "No Cinderellas" ad fifty times.

I'm pulling for UNC, of course, but yeah, it seemed like they and Kansas got the easy half of the bracket for sure.
4:35 PM
John said…
Yeah, Kansas and UNC got the easy half of the bracket . . . but I am starting to believe that Texas can emerge from the South bracket. Memphis just looked abysmal, and they have a track record of compiling a paper champion record in the regular season and folding like origami in the tournament.
4:59 PM
Mike said…
Yeah, I'd picked Texas to do well, though, so don't get too excited. On the other hand, I agree, especially since Memphis was 33-1 or whatever. It's almost like being a 1-loss team is more an indictment of your schedule than evidence of your greatness. I mean, nobody's THAT good, so if the record says you are, you almost definitely aren't & you haven't been tested properly (see recent teams like when Jameer Nelson was at St. Joseph's or when Dee & Deron were at Illinois, though at least the fellows in orange made the title game). Shoot, look at the '99 Duke squad, too.
5:50 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...
5 comments
Read more

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...
9 comments
Read more

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...
12 comments
Read more