Skip to main content

Great upsets

I don't like to brag much, but at one point this weekend in my family's bracket challenge on ESPN, my five bracket entires held the bottom five spots in the lineup of fourteen, which I assume is why no one reads this blog.

While I missed a ton of basketball this weekend, I did get to see much of my favorite game: West Virginia over Duke. I hate Duke and it's always fun to see them fail, though perhaps it would have been more fun had Preakness University done the honors in the first round. I don't really care for Bob Huggins, either, except that now I think he deserves a 200-foot statue and a place in the Hall of Fame.

To be fair, these program schools are a little odd. Beating Duke this year isn't like beating Jason Williams/Shane Battier Duke, and it's nothing like beating Trajan Langdon/Elton Brand Duke. In retrospect the Blue Devils were a pretty good team, but not really championship material. The odd thing about watching the West Virginia game was that I kept expecting Duke to make some kind of run, and they simply couldn't. How far the mighty have fallen, at least for now, and how sweet it is.

Also exciting is Georgetown's loss today to Davidson. Next weekend I have to catch me some Stephen Curry. Georgetown's loss left my brackets in tatters, too, but who freaking cares? The whole point of the opening weekend is watching high-seeded teams fall flat on their face, and if you get some great individual performances, too, that's all the better.

And finally, I guess a No. 6 should lose to a No. 3, but I'm still pleased that Oklahoma managed to fall short by so much (by 30 points to Louisville, a small town near my home). I absolutely can't stand Oklahoma, and I hate their basketball team as much as their football team, which is rare for me. The University of Utah is probably the only other school to inspire that kind of feeling from me. I mean I don't like Nebraska's hoops team, but I don't have to hear about them, either.

What did y'all think of the weekend?

Comments

John said…
I agree on all fronts. With Duke's FIRST round loss last year, they are starting to look like the overhyped chumps they always have been. I really wish Belmont/Preakness would have pulled it out in the first round, but I will take what I can get.

All of DC is reeling over the G-town loss . . . I thought they were overrated, but I thought they would last at least until the Sweet Sixteen. I wonder if this means Nike will be pulling their John Thompson/John Thompson III ads with the tagline: "There are no Cinderellas."

And watching Oklahoma get obliterated in any sport is worth the price of admission.

Overall, the weekend was solid, although I expect Davidson and Villanova to run their course next weekend. And North Carolina looked absolutely dominant, albeit against the likes of the Smoky Hill Institute of Technology.
Mike said…
You know, Duke barely winning one game isn't nearly as bad as losing in the very next round. It's not rare for even a title-winning team to have at least one really close call, but the good teams bounce back. Duke didn't really bounce back at all, which just goes to show exactly what you said. And while I don't follow them that closely, I haven't heard of any Jason Williams-like recruits on the horizon who are supposed to turn it around for them.

Even I saw that "No Cinderellas" ad fifty times.

I'm pulling for UNC, of course, but yeah, it seemed like they and Kansas got the easy half of the bracket for sure.
John said…
Yeah, Kansas and UNC got the easy half of the bracket . . . but I am starting to believe that Texas can emerge from the South bracket. Memphis just looked abysmal, and they have a track record of compiling a paper champion record in the regular season and folding like origami in the tournament.
Mike said…
Yeah, I'd picked Texas to do well, though, so don't get too excited. On the other hand, I agree, especially since Memphis was 33-1 or whatever. It's almost like being a 1-loss team is more an indictment of your schedule than evidence of your greatness. I mean, nobody's THAT good, so if the record says you are, you almost definitely aren't & you haven't been tested properly (see recent teams like when Jameer Nelson was at St. Joseph's or when Dee & Deron were at Illinois, though at least the fellows in orange made the title game). Shoot, look at the '99 Duke squad, too.

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...