Skip to main content

Saturday's divisional games

Packers over Seahawks: A fun game to watch, if you like the Packers. I turned the TV on when it was 14-0 Seattle. That was the high point for Seattle's postseason, since the Packers ended up winning by 22.

I was stoked to see Favre play so well, and he played so under control. He didn't take any dumb chances, but he still had a cool Favre play, that one when he was falling forward avoiding a sack and flipped the ball ahead to tight end Donald Lee for a first down.

But mostly it was just cool to see Favre playing with such passion and to see a playoff game in Lambeau in the snow. I know a lot of people are waiting for Favre to retire, and I know the Packers haven't been very good in recent years, so maybe it doesn't really matter if he stays or goes. But Green Bay is professional football, you know? I'd hate to see Favre retire and have such a prominent franchise fade from the national scene. I couldn't help thinking about that during the game.

Patriots over Jaguars: As any idiot or sane monkey could have predicted, the Patriots defeated the Jaguars. (I do NOT think it's impressive that I called this game. I do think it's amazing that anyone got it wrong.) The Jaguars played the Pats pretty neck-and-neck in the first half, though, which I guess gives them an Eli Manning-like moral victory. (Now watch Manning beat the Cowboys tomorrow and have everyone wonder on Monday what I meant by that...obviously I'm talking about the 16-0 game where the Giants kept it close.)

The Jaguars' vaunted running game picked up 80 yards on 22 carries. Lawrence Maroney of the Patriots had just as many carries, but picked up 122 yards and a score. Tom Brady had the best completion percentage in playoff history, which is kind of a dumb stat but neat for him, I guess.

Forget the stats, though. The Patriots had a bunch of sweet plays, like the fake-snap-to-the-tailback that ended in a touchdown pass, or that play where it looked like Brady was throwing it away but instead threw it to Donté Stallworth for 53 yards, or maybe Stallworth's last first-down catch, where he dove for the marker on third down and helped kill some clock at the end. I'm just glad today was such a great day for football.

Comments

John said…
Maroney went for 122 yards and the Pats held the Jags to 80 yards on the ground. I guess, Blaine, the Pats can neither run the ball nor defend the run well enough to beat the historic Jacksonville franchise.

Stallworth had a huge game, and I particularly liked his smart play to pick up the first down at the end.

The Seahawks-Packers was one of the most fun games to watch I have seen in awhile. It reminded me of playing in the front yard during a snow storm, and Favre was playing some inspired football. All I have to say is that if the weather is like that in Green Bay next weekend, the Giants don't stand a chance.
blaine said…
I was really surprised that the Jags came out throwing the ball, and for the most part, continued to throw the ball the whole game. Garrard even had more yards passing than Brady! Clearly the Patriots are a better team than the Jags, but I think Del Rio did a good job changing up the plays in the first half, but the Jags were outmatched in the second half. I would've liked to have seen the Jags try to come out running the ball more in the third quarter, and try to send some more guys at Brady to put some pressure on him. Having said that, no matter how many changes they could've made, it's clear that the Pats would've still found a way to win. That offensive line for the Pats is pretty amazing. The way they man-handle D-linemen, it reminds me of the O-line of the Cowboys from the 90s.
Mike said…
Yeah, I loved the weather in Green Bay, and it would be cool to see it again this week. Plus I think a Packers-Patriots Super Bowl could be a lot of fun.

Blaine, at least you see it now...

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...