Skip to main content

Vick in the clink

Michael Vick was sentenced to 23 months in prison today, and counting time he's already served, he should be released in October 2009.

That gives us a chance to look at the question: will Michael Vick ever play in the NFL again?

Vick will be 29 when he's released, but there's basically no way he's playing in 2009. What team would take the chance? Basically, you'd have to be a team with championship aspirations that desperately needs a quarterback for several weeks. Considering Vick's reputation and the subsequent PR hit, it would have to be a team with absolutely no scruples. So unless Tom Brady gets hurt in week six of the 2009 season, Vick won't play until 2010, when he'll be 30.

Could Vick be a good thirty-year-old quarterback? Well, he obviously relies more on his physical talent than his ability to read coverages. But assuming he can stay in shape, his physical gifts should not vanish before 2010. He'll still be capable of playing in the NFL.

However, all of this is moot, because he'll have to get past the planet's Most Vindictive Bastard, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, if he wants to play again. So it won't happen. Keep in mind that Goodell is the same man who just fined Broncos coach Mike Shanahan $25,000 for some really tame comments supporting running back Travis Henry's suspension appeal. And remember that this was an appeal Henry actually won. Talk about a sore loser. Considering the punishments Goodell loves dishing out (and be grateful he wasn't your dad the time you stayed out three minutes past curfew), I don't see any way he lets Vick play again.

Comments

blaine said…
What a terrible waste of tremendous talent! I read that Vick has lost nearly $140 million in lost salary and endorsements.

I would bet his situation would've been greatly improved had he not been caught smoking weed. Because of that, I bet you're right, I can't see Goodell letting him play again.
1:50 PM
Mike said…
Wow, $140 million...wow.

I'm also wondering how Vick'll be received even if he would be allowed to play in 2010...is everyone just going to assume he's over the hill? Because the conventional wisdom said he wasn't going to last very long to begin with, considering his reliance on sheer athleticism and his aggressive style of play.
8:26 AM
blaine said…
If Goodell does let him come back and play, I'm sure some desperate GM will pick him up despite the PR nightmare he will bring upon his team. The question is, will he play QB? He wasn't really a great QB to begin with, and after spending 2 years in the slammer (I doubt he will be able to practice throwing routes with the other inmates) I'm sure his skills will have diminished greatly. It will be interesting to see if they make him a slot receiver, or some kind of special teams returner or something. I imagine he'll probably just be used on gimmick QB plays like the Falcons did when he and Schaub were on the team.

On a side note, I do think they are coming down a little hard on Vick. I mean, I like dogs as much as the next guy, but it's not like he killed anyone like our friend Leonard Little did. He killed someone while driving drunk, and only served 90 days in jail. Then he was caught drunk driving again and didn't serve any additional time at all. Last year Little signed a 3 year contract extension with the Rams. When things are put into perspective, how much more valuable is a human life than a dog's? Why is PETA all over Vick when there's players currently playing who have taken the life of another human being.

I certainly don't condone the choices Vick has made, but I think what he has done has been blown way out of proportion.
9:54 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...
13 comments
Read more

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...
11 comments
Read more

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...
2 comments
Read more