Skip to main content

The Broncos and the Patriots

The Denver Broncos destroyed the Kansas City Chiefs yesterday, 41-7. Jay Cutler was absolutely on fire: 20-for-27, 244 yards, four touchdowns, no interceptions. I'm almost surprised that seven of his passes hit the ground, because he was hitting on everything from short-drops to back-foot tosses down the seams.

I hate games like this late in the season, that tease with terrific performances. Too bad it'll be nine months before we see if there's any real carryover. Brandon Marshall, who's been good all year, went over a thousand yards receiving, and broke tackles like he always does. If he and Javon Walker are healthy next year, and Cutler plays well out of the gate, this is easily a playoff team, right? But then you remember that we lost by two touchdowns to Oakland last week, and the future looks much less clear.

The Patriots, on the other hand, passed their second major test of the season with flying colors, beating the Pittsburgh Steelers 34-13. Don't let the score deceive you: the Steelers are a very good team. But no one looks too good when the Patriots are primed.

Tom Brady, who should have already received this year's MVP trophy, threw for 399 yards and four touchdowns. ESPN.com has him on pace for 5,040 passing yards, 55 touchdowns, and six picks, which is insane.

The Patriots are now 13-0, which puts them just over two-thirds of the way to a perfect season, counting the playoffs. They're clearly the class of the league, so it's easy to say they should go 19-0, especially considering their remaining regular season games are against substandard competition.

But I think that marginalizes what a great accomplishment a perfect season would be. The last team to make a run like this was the 1998 Broncos, who hit 13-0 with a comeback win over Kansas City, when John Elway went over 400 yards and Shannon Sharpe ended his self-imposed week of silence with the game-winning touchdown catch.

(This was after the first game against the Chiefs, a game which was one of the finest moments of Shannon Sharpe's career. Late in a 30-7 Broncos victory, Sharpe goaded Derrick Thomas into three personal fouls on a late drive. The most memorable were Thomas grabbing Sharpe's face mask and swinging him around really blatantly. Never really found out what Sharpe was saying, but it must have been good. Anyway, for some reason he was quiet that whole week.)

Anyway, the Broncos looked unstoppable but lost their next two games, first to the Giants and then to the Dolphins, to finish at 14-2.

Coincidentally enough, the Patriots' schedule closes with games against the Jets, Dolphins, and Giants. (The nearly-perfect Broncos team beat the Jets in the AFC Championship that year.) More significantly, the Jets seemed to ignite New England's run by catching them cheating in Week One this year.

And then there's Miami. The Dolphins are the only franchise ever to go undefeated (in 1972), and they ended the 1985 Chicago Bears' quest for an undefeated season in a famous Monday night game. It would be fascinating if Miami, which is currently winless, beat New England to end the Patriots' run in two weeks. (Of course, unlike this year's team, the '85 and '98 Dolphins had Dan Marino.) I hate the '72 Dolphins, but that would be kind of a cool story. I can't tell you that the Patriots will trip up, but going undefeated is a huge and difficult accomplishment. Despite the competition, it's still going to be very impressive if New England wins out.

Comments

blaine said…
Seeing the Broncos play that well yesterday makes me wonder why they haven't been able to put together some better performances earlier in the year. Granted, it was against the Chiefs who are struggling this year, but yesterday it looked like there was a whole different team on the field. Is there a problem with motivation? Could Shanahan be doing a better job? It was only one game, but it did reveal that the Broncos have a lot of talent that doesn't seem to playing up to it's potential every week.

The Patriots are clearly the best team in the league this year, and the title is theirs for the taking. I've heard many people say they think the Patriots are the best team ever. I don't think that is true. The Patriots are dominating an extremely mediocre NFL this year. I do think they are an amazing football team, but I think the fact that so many teams have been so disappointing this year must be taken into consideration as well. Think of how many teams have been disappointments this year: Denver, Baltimore, Cincinnati, San Diego, Philadelphia, Chicago, Carolina, and New Orleans. The Colts haven't been healthy all year, and it's unlikely they will have all their starters for the playoffs. The Cowboys might be good, but the only "good" team they have beat this year are the Packers so who can be sure how good they really are? I can't remember the last time we had so many teams that were suppose to be title contenders that have played so poorly throughout the year.
Mike said…
Yeah, that Broncos game has been bugging me. After last night, I'm not even sure it really happened.

Anyway, I have no idea if it's a motivation issue or what. Part of it's inconsistency, some of which is due to young players, especially Jay Cutler, and injuries, like to Javon Walker, who was probably our best offensive player last year. Plus Champ Bailey's not as good as last year, though I think that says more about how amazing he was in 2006.

I completely agree that the Patriots are doing great in a year with little real competition. That's a great point. (New England has played pretty tough teams in Pittsburgh and Indy, though.) I don't think they're the best team ever, but if they go 19-0, they're definitely better than the '72 Dolphins.

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...