Skip to main content

Monday Night Thoughts

Some thoughts from Monday Night Football...

1. I wish T.O. hadn’t been playing last night-sometimes, you just need a break from the guy. That said, he wasn’t the most loathsome player on the field Monday night-I’d take him over Jeremy Shockey, certainly, and probably Eli Manning. And yet, Eli and Shockey were playing the Cowboys. Can you root for both teams to lose?

2. Tiki Barber’s played for New York his whole career, but he’s still underrated. You should watch him while you still can. I’m serious. I can’t quite say why, but I got a feeling watching the game last night that this could be Barber’s last season in the NFL. I haven’t spoken to any Giants, but it just seems right. Call it a hunch.

3. Eli Manning’s first-quarter bomb to Plexiglass Burress was both a wonderful throw and a fantastic catch. When the younger Manning is making smart decisions with the ball, it can be a thing of beauty. When he’s rifling it at a triple-covered Amani Toomer, as he did later in the quarter, then not so much. Manning also got so claustrophobic under one first-half rush that he put his head down and ran over to a defensive linemen, who promptly sacked him. I’m not even kidding-on the replay, he puts his head down like he’s about to get hit, but realizes he sort of quit on the play early, so he steps forward into the guy’s arms. You don’t believe me, do you? It happened!

4. I sort of feel for Drew Bledsoe, who’s obviously good enough to start in the NFL but is just as clearly not a great passer. I was happy for him when he ran in that QB sneak in the second quarter. That said...I could not have been less surprised than I was when he threw the pick on second-and-goal near the end of the half. I’d hate to be average at a job like NFL quarterback. Yeah, the money’s great, but the American public has (fairly or not) equated Drew Bledsoe with sucking pretty much for the last decade or so.

5. All the fans in Dallas rooting for Tony Romo, well, they got what you wanted. Romo was pretty solid, by the numbers anyway-more than two hundred yards in a half and two scores. Except he threw three picks, including one that went ninety-six yards for a score. (So, in other words, he ended up making the same throw that got Bledsoe benched.) Not to beat this into the ground, but I bring this up amidst reports that the Broncos are considering a change at QB. (Mike Shanahan said Jake Plummer will start this week.)

If the team does bench Plummer, what happens if Cutler isn’t any better? Plummer has experience, and I’d feel better watching a struggling Plummer than a struggling Cutler, if that makes any sense. But our offense has been inconsistent all year long. I don’t feel like they’ve been truly terrible, though, and I keep expecting us to break it open. Maybe I’m blind. But once Cutler takes the field, all his potential disappears, and it comes down to what he can do right now. If we do make a change, I just hope we're sure.

And continuing highlights from our series, Proud Moments in Cleveland Browns History. Today’s episode: Sunday, October 22, 2006:

1. The Browns, just barely in Broncos territory, have a fourth-and-short in the first quarter and elect to go for it. Charlie Frye takes the snap, rolls to the left, and gets sacked. Now, the play call was stupid, and he didn’t have a ton of time, but he could have gotten rid of the ball. What are you going to do, throw a pick? Granted, you don’t want to give up a long return, but considering all the Broncos were in his face, they couldn’t have blocked for the interceptor or anything. Just chuck it, man.

2. On first-and-goal early in the third, Plummer lofts a pass to rookie receiver Brandon Marshall in the end zone. The pass falls incomplete. On the way back to the huddle, Cleveland defensive back Ralph Brown glares at Marshall and appears to be jawing at him, as well. Fun fact about Brown: he attended the University of Nebraska. How do I know? On the next play, Brown gave up a touchdown pass to Brandon Marshall.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Mike, I think benching Bledsoe solved all of Dallas' problems. Actually it made me think and now I am in agreeance with you about the whole Plumber/Cutler issue. The second you take out Plumber for Cutler, your basically stuck with a rookie quarterback for the rest of the season reguardless of how he plays. Plumber's not great, but he's still better than having a quarterback that we don't know can play. Until Plumber starts to cost us game, winning with poor

Can I be the first to ask for a Tiki/Jim Brown comparision? What do you think?
Mike said…
In my mind, those comparisons are ridiculous. About the only thing you can say is that both (apparently) retired at the top of their game.

Tiki Barber's a fine runner when he holds on to the ball, but Brown was one of the very best players ever at any position.

I guess another comparison you can make is that I don't really care for either one of them. Barber’s retirement and overall smoothness is just obnoxious-like when he called his guards “my pulling machines” on MNF. Come on, man, this is football, quit being cute.

And Brown…I don’t know. Yeah, he walked away when he could still get it done, but that’s not really a decision I have a ton of respect for. I mean, he can retire if he wants, but I don’t look up to him for it. Yet in historical arguments, he almost gets extra credit for it-plus I think he’s remembered so fondly partly because no one ever saw him struggle. That’s lame-you can’t say he would have outgained Emmitt or whomever AND say he never missed a beat, because who knows if that would have lasted?

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...