Skip to main content

NFL Goes Global (again)

You’ve probably already heard that the NFL will hold a regular season game in a foreign country next year. (That’s not a first, but the league wants to make it a permanent part of the schedule.) This feels like a big story-for all I know, it led off SportsCenter, which I almost never watch.

(For some reason everyone assumes I love ESPN. I guess that makes sense-I do run a sports blog-but still. I guess I just don’t like NASCAR highlights as much as you’d think I do. Or how they always pull that, “Coming up next…” crap when they have an interesting story that won’t air for another forty minutes. A few months back a friend of mine tried to invite herself over to watch some non-World Cup soccer game, because of course I get the Ocho and would have it on. No dice. I’m curious-do any of you guys watch SportsCenter regularly?)

Anyway, I don’t much care for the idea, though it wouldn’t have much impact on any one team.
The plan would be set up so that teams would rotate over a 16-year period, with each team playing outside the country twice over that span, once as a visitor, the other as a home team. That means a team would lose one game team during that span.

"Obviously the league's going to work out the economics and if we lose a home game, we'll get compensated," said Pat Bowlen, owner of the Denver Broncos. "We're comfortable with it. Obviously we'd like to play in Mexico or Canada and not have to travel to Europe and that's probably the way it would be set up because of our location. But as far as the league's concerned, I think it's a great idea."
Right now I’m supposed to say insightful like, “Oh, I guess this is all about the money”-but instead I’ll settle for having no clue what this “one game team” is that everyone's losing.

Sure, if the Broncos play in Germany in 2012 and then in Mexico in 2020, I’ll live. Not a huge disruption, especially if the league time-zones it properly for TV here, which they certainly will. I thought other countries didn't like football, but obviously the league thinks they’ll come around. I don’t really care whether other countries start liking football, but whatever. (Is the Champions League coming to Miami anytime soon?)

What happens when there’s a Broncos-Raiders game in the United Kingdom? You’re right-that will probably never happen. I'd guess that teams won’t play division or even conference rivals overseas. Some year, though, a couple of teams will exceed preseason expectations, and the biggest game of the year will be in Canada. (I can’t think of any good examples this year because no one’s really gone from awful to good, but last year you could have had, say, an incredible Bears-Bengals game outside the U.S.) Is that going to be a big deal to you?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Why is the NFL trying to globalize? Does it fear that it is loosing popularity to sports like baseball or hockey. I will say its a good idea though, all the New Zealanders and Philipinos here don't understand the game at all; so, they just complain about MNF-It's obnoxious
Mike said…
I'm confused, do your friends from New Zealand like the NHL?
Mike said…
Well, I agree, except I think the best game of the season or at least very good games usually are quirky, because there are usually a few really surprising teams. I wouldn't expect Colts-Patriots to be overseas for at least two retirements from now, but there could always be a team like the 99 Rams, as an extreme example, playing out of the States.

But it's not like I was going to go to that big of a game anyway, right?

And I disagree with the guy who said I can make all that money in my spare time. I don't really see it being that easy. Plus, not to be that guy, but he (or she! Women can spam just as well as a man) seemed a little off-topic, too.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...