Skip to main content

Four without fear

So it’s not quite Jacksonville-Kansas City-Pittsburgh-Green Bay, but the Broncos are nonetheless coming up on their most exciting four-game stretch in years, and I can’t wait.

This Sunday: Indianapolis at Denver. The Broncos host the Colts in Denver’s first real test of the season. (Unless you count the Rams.)

The Colts’ perfect 6-0 mark does include road wins against both New York squads, but the horseshoe-shorn squad has already played half its home games. The Colts had an easy early schedule? Could the NFL front office be looking to do them some kind of favor?

Indianapolis brings the third-ranked offense (and the fourth in scoring) into the home of the league’s stingiest defenders. But forget the numbers-this matchup is interesting because of certain recent postseason events I’d prefer not to mention. In like fashion, Denver has owned the regular season matchups, but this is the first recent in-season meeting to hold significance for both teams.

Nov. 5: At Pittsburgh. After destroying the Colts, the Broncos move on to Pittsburgh, where they’ll dishonor Heinz Field in much the same way their foes despoiled the sacred grass of Invesco last January.

The Steelers are weird. Their stopgap quarterback, Charlie Batch, has almost twice the quarterback rating of superstar Ben Roethlisberger (136.8 to 74.5). They’re ninth in offensive yardage and twelfth in defensive, and they’ve outscored opponents by nineteen-but the defending champions are just 2-4.

Pittsburgh’s dangerous, but they’ve struggled against good defenses this year-and the Broncos certainly qualify on that count.

Nov. 12: At Oakland. Unfortunately, Oakland failed in their glorious quest for winlessness. Now that they’ve sampled the sweet nectar of victory, are the Raiders a formidable opponent for the Horsemen? No chance! Expect Art Shell, Andrew Walter, and Randy “Never Die Easy” Moss to remain gainfully employed during this contest, and expect Oakland’s season of futility to nadir with a devastating defeat at the hands of their most hated rival.

Oh, I suppose it has all the makings of a “trap” game, but I don’t gamble and don’t intend to get you to start, so why make something out of nothing? On a side note, I did make note of the NFL’s thoughtful nature, scheduling this game two weeks after Halloween so as to allow Bay Area costume shops to restock Darth Vader outfits in anticipation of kickoff.

Nov. 19: San Diego at Denver. The Chargers are perhaps the surprise of the NFL season. (Or, more accurately, Philip Rivers is.) I hope the punishing Denver defense can accelerate Fill-up’s transition into his post-football career as a service station attendant, because I can never remember if it’s Philip or Phillip.

However, with a sparkling 96.3 rating twenty-three days in advance of the AFC West’s showcase showdown, this appears unlikely. It appears LaDainian’s career may yet not be in vain, for San Diego has finally found the passer they’ve sought since running Drew Brees out of town so many seasons past.

With a powerful offense ranked fourth in the NFL, surely San Diego must thirst for improvement on the ball’s opposite side, yes? Nay, for the Chargers are No. 1 in the NFL’s yards-allowed standings, though they give up almost twice as many points as the Broncos.

San Diego is very good-perhaps the most complete team we’ll face this year.

You know what else is good? 9-1.

Comments

Mike said…
Yeah, 8-2 might be all right. I'm still ticked about the game.
Mike said…
Wait, why would Ray Rhodes make you feel good?

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...