Skip to main content

Four without fear

So it’s not quite Jacksonville-Kansas City-Pittsburgh-Green Bay, but the Broncos are nonetheless coming up on their most exciting four-game stretch in years, and I can’t wait.

This Sunday: Indianapolis at Denver. The Broncos host the Colts in Denver’s first real test of the season. (Unless you count the Rams.)

The Colts’ perfect 6-0 mark does include road wins against both New York squads, but the horseshoe-shorn squad has already played half its home games. The Colts had an easy early schedule? Could the NFL front office be looking to do them some kind of favor?

Indianapolis brings the third-ranked offense (and the fourth in scoring) into the home of the league’s stingiest defenders. But forget the numbers-this matchup is interesting because of certain recent postseason events I’d prefer not to mention. In like fashion, Denver has owned the regular season matchups, but this is the first recent in-season meeting to hold significance for both teams.

Nov. 5: At Pittsburgh. After destroying the Colts, the Broncos move on to Pittsburgh, where they’ll dishonor Heinz Field in much the same way their foes despoiled the sacred grass of Invesco last January.

The Steelers are weird. Their stopgap quarterback, Charlie Batch, has almost twice the quarterback rating of superstar Ben Roethlisberger (136.8 to 74.5). They’re ninth in offensive yardage and twelfth in defensive, and they’ve outscored opponents by nineteen-but the defending champions are just 2-4.

Pittsburgh’s dangerous, but they’ve struggled against good defenses this year-and the Broncos certainly qualify on that count.

Nov. 12: At Oakland. Unfortunately, Oakland failed in their glorious quest for winlessness. Now that they’ve sampled the sweet nectar of victory, are the Raiders a formidable opponent for the Horsemen? No chance! Expect Art Shell, Andrew Walter, and Randy “Never Die Easy” Moss to remain gainfully employed during this contest, and expect Oakland’s season of futility to nadir with a devastating defeat at the hands of their most hated rival.

Oh, I suppose it has all the makings of a “trap” game, but I don’t gamble and don’t intend to get you to start, so why make something out of nothing? On a side note, I did make note of the NFL’s thoughtful nature, scheduling this game two weeks after Halloween so as to allow Bay Area costume shops to restock Darth Vader outfits in anticipation of kickoff.

Nov. 19: San Diego at Denver. The Chargers are perhaps the surprise of the NFL season. (Or, more accurately, Philip Rivers is.) I hope the punishing Denver defense can accelerate Fill-up’s transition into his post-football career as a service station attendant, because I can never remember if it’s Philip or Phillip.

However, with a sparkling 96.3 rating twenty-three days in advance of the AFC West’s showcase showdown, this appears unlikely. It appears LaDainian’s career may yet not be in vain, for San Diego has finally found the passer they’ve sought since running Drew Brees out of town so many seasons past.

With a powerful offense ranked fourth in the NFL, surely San Diego must thirst for improvement on the ball’s opposite side, yes? Nay, for the Chargers are No. 1 in the NFL’s yards-allowed standings, though they give up almost twice as many points as the Broncos.

San Diego is very good-perhaps the most complete team we’ll face this year.

You know what else is good? 9-1.

Comments

Mike said…
Yeah, 8-2 might be all right. I'm still ticked about the game.
Mike said…
Wait, why would Ray Rhodes make you feel good?

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...