Skip to main content

Raiders' Super Bowl hopes

Welcome back! Believe it or not, in almost a year and a half, this is HPS' 100th post. That blows my mind, because it seems like every few weeks I apologize to you two for never writing, but I've written more than once a week.

The glorious NFL season is nearly upon us-the Broncos' preseason opener is tomorrow night. I've always wanted to write one of those huge Bill Simmons-type previews that talks about every team, but I'm too lazy to write it and you're too lazy to read it. Instead we'll start with a tour through the AFC West and see how we feel. Today's subject: the Oakland Raiders.

Last year: The Raiders finished with a 4-12 regular-season record. As a result, they did not appear in the playoffs.

The big change: The return of Art Shell as head coach. Shell led the Raiders to a 54-38 record from 1989 to 1994 (I should probably mention that I lifted that stat and almost all others from ESPN.com.). The former offensive lineman is a gigantic improvement over last year's coach, the laughable Norv Turner.

Shell's not just any former player-he's a Hall-of-Fame offensive lineman. That's important because any improvement in the play of Oakland's offensive line will be huge. On a positive note, the Oakland line has as much room to improve as any in the entire league.

They stockpile bad passers: The Raiders sure like NFC South washouts at quarterback, signing talented ex-Saint Aaron Brooks to replace the gashed Kerry Collins. Like Collins, Brooks has a strong arm and can throw the deep ball. Like Collins, he doesn't waste time obsessing over which team catches those deep passes. Brooks is mobile and was accurate in his early days, but has made little improvement as his career has gone on.

The offense: The Raiders nevertheless have to get something out of Brooks, as neither Andrew Walter nor the Marquis de Tuiasosopo is ready to contribute. (Tuiasosopo will clearly never become ready.) Brooks has a pretty solid supporting cast for a team that lost a dozen games-Randy Moss can still be the league's premier deep threat, and runner LaMont Jordan should have a bounce-back season if the passing attack can keep defenses guessing.

On the other hand, the line could be horrible again, and the dropoff from Moss to the team's No. 2 receiver is big, especially if Jerry Porter is traded. Expect inconsistency all season long.

The defense: The Raiders surrendered more than 2,000 yards rushing and a passer rating greater than 90 to opposing teams last year. In other words, at least the defense was consistent. Oakland picked former Texas safety Michael Huff in the draft, but they need help all over the field. And yes, Warren Sapp is still, technically, on the team.

Greatest power forward of all-time: will kick.

Outlook: 4-12 is really bad and the Raiders should win more games this year. But they have way too many question marks to compete for the playoffs. I expect six or seven wins from this team.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Orange Julius

All right, class, what kind of things do we look for in an NBA draftee? A player who's proven, or one with oodles of upside? A guy coming off a spectacular college career, or one coming off the bench for his Serbian club team? A player who's shown constant improvement, or one who mysteriously fared worse as a senior than a junior? No, Kiki, put your hand down, it's the first answer to each of these questions, not the second. Yesterday the Nuggets picked 20th in the first round, selecting Julius Hodge, shooting guard/small forward, out of North Carolina State. College fans will immediately recognize his name, as Hodge was the ACC Player of the Year as a junior. Unfortunately, he just finished his senior year, which was marked mostly by a dip in his scoring numbers (he developed a sudden inability to hit free throws or threes) and a punch to the groin by Wake Forest guard Chris Paul. Hodge is mostly a mid-range and slashing-type scorer, kind of like the more-than-sufficient s...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...