Skip to main content

Kansas City

Last year the Chiefs finished second in the AFC West at 10-6, the best record not to make the postseason.

So they fired their coach. Not really. Dick Vermeil just retired. The Chiefs replaced him with Herman Edwards, late of the New York Jets. I want to mock Edwards, who feels like a downgrade from Vermeil. But in five years with the Jets he won two playoff games, or one more than the beloved Broncos in that span.

Edwards' performance has been up-and-down. In those five years, his team had double-digit wins twice and double-digit losses twice. It's hard to say how good he really is, because the Jets had some serious questions every year. It'll be the same with Kansas City.

Fantasy football alert! Larry Johnson is a consensus top fantasy player this year. Last year, he gained 2,093 yards from scrimmage. He's the added dimension that will get the Chiefs over the hump this year, right? Not really. Priest Holmes beat that total each of his first three years with K.C. (2001-2003).

I like to watch Gatorade X-Factor Dante Hall at this point of his career. The explosive Hall has the ability to blow any game open. Emphasis on ability, not on actually doing it. If he was feared during that four or five-game stretch a couple years ago, he isn't now. Hall caught more than three passes in a game only twice last year and returned one kick for a touchdown.

The offense is still in good hands with Trent Green, who finished second in passing yards last year. I don't get Green-when I watch him, he doesn't do anything too special, but at the end of the year his statistics are always beautiful. He's got to be pretty, you know, good. And it's not like he loads up on short passes, either. The only questions are his age and backups.

I am slightly concerned because someone who knows way more football than I do, Sports Illustrated's Dr. Z, questions the Chiefs' offensive line. But the Chiefs had the league's top-rated offense last year, so even with a moderate slide they'll be spectacular.

On paper, the defense looks improved, but we've heard that song before. That said, I am intrigued by new corners Ty Law and Lenny Walls. Law is getting old, but he was amazing in the playoffs a year and a half ago and Walls is...well, I like Walls, too.

They'd better be solid, because I don't fear the pass rush. The Chiefs were below-average against both the pass and run last year, but weren't that bad. Edwards is certainly more defensive-minded than Vermeil, but I'm not sure if that will translate into actual improvement or just a slower-tempo club.

So I'm picking the Chiefs to do about what they did last year, which is what I'm doing for all the AFC West teams, it seems. Right now, they're the Broncos' most dangerous competition for the division title. I think they'll finish in second, with around nine wins, but they could surprise.

Comments

Mike said…
Oh, I certainly don't think Edwards is a great coach-I'm not even sure I think he's a good coach. It's just that he has had some success. Then again, it's all in wild-card games, you know? I do think he's a small step down from Vermeil.
Anonymous said…
Didn't we have another disgrunted receiver find his way to KC and have some enormous success?

Kennison all the way
David said…
don't you either have sucess, or not... but you posit that kennison had "some."

1100 yards. wow. stop the press, this guy is the next jerry rice
Mike said…
"Some enormous success", even. Did you bring up Eddie Kennison to compare him to Ashley Lelie? Well, I don't feel particularly bad about letting Kennison go, because he quit! I mean, what other choice did we have? Even if Lelie goes on to some measure of unprecedented success, you can't fault the Broncos for saying goodbye to him.

Besides, a Chiefs receiver is like a Broncos tailback. With the way the teams operate, the No. 1 guy ought to have a thousand yards at the bare minimum, right?

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...