Skip to main content

Chargers preview

I just watched part of the Monday night game, and Minnesota...how can I put this. Look, I love the Broncos to death, but did you ever think those side stripes would become a fashion trend?

Anyway, today's team: the San Diego Chargers.

Last year: 9-7, third in the AFC West

What changed? The Chargers allowed quarterback Drew Brees, coming off a shoulder injury and consecutive productive seasons, to leave in free agency. His replacement is Philip Rivers, a third-year man who's thrown just thirty passes in his NFL career.

The pressure's on Rivers, obviously, to show he's worth the gamble. Brees was rarely spectacular, but he's consistent, accurate, and has a veteran's knack for avoiding bad plays. Actually, that's a silly thing to say-veteran NFL quarterbacks include guys like Jake Plummer, Brett Favre, and Aaron Brooks, who make mistakes like kids make Nikes.

Brees played well enough to give the Chargers a chance in just about every game. The team probably looked at Brees and thought he played just well enough to lose in big games. But since they've kept Marty Schottenheimer this long, you'd think that fit in great with the organization's overall strategy.

Anyway, Rivers is a fantastic prospect. I rated him the number two quarterback in his draft class, behind Ben Roethlisberger but certainly ahead of Eli Manning. He's more pocket passer than scrambler, but he's got enough arm to add a vertical dimension to the offensive attack. He does throw a little sidearm, but Rivers could chuck it underhand and still have a higher release point than Brees.

On offense, everyone loves LaDainian Tomlinson, the best back in the league for years now. If you're playing fantasy football, you're a dork. Also, you know the kind of damage Tomlinson can do to even the best defenses. Tomlinson will have a fantastic year even if Rivers sucks, but will that translate into wins?

The Chargers were one of three AFC West teams in the top ten in offensive yardage last year (everyone but Oakland, of course). But they were sixth in pass efficiency, a number that will surely drop. I think the Chargers will be middle-of-the-pack offensively this year.

Defense: San Diego led the league in defense against the run last year by yardage, but were 28th against the pass. This year, they're very young along the defensive line and at cornerback, so while they could improve, I think they'll give up some big games as well. With Schottenheimer at the helm, San Diego will be conservative and the defense will seem respectable enough, but don't be misled: this is a question mark.

Outlook: With the uncertainty at quarterback and on defense, the Chargers have taken a step backwards. Yes, this team has exceeded expectations the last few seasons, but Brees provided a lot of that grit. I think San Diego will compete with Oakland for the division cellar.

Comments

David said…
you know it's odd, i never ever get tired of beating a schottenheimer team. he's such a loser... him, dan reeves and gary barnett need to get together and massage each other's butt's about conservative game play whilst keeping your job
Mike said…
NOT a pretty picture...but how true it is.

I didn't get this on the hiring side, because it's not like Schottenheimer doesn't have a clear track record...but all those guys will keep you competitive and keep the real trophies at arm's length. (My apologies to Lamar Hunt, of course.)

Maybe they (meaning teams) would just rather not lose big than win. Buncha sissies.
Mike said…
I forgot to mention, amen on beating Schottenheimer. That really never does get old.

Yeah, I'm not sure cutting Brees was such a bad move, either-if I had to guess, I'd say Rivers ends up being a better pro (which is sort of saying something at this point). Besides, the Chargers weren't getting any better.
David said…
you need to do a story on bvp complaining about losing the second slot to cutler...
Mike said…
Are you crazy? If I ignore him, he might go away...

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...