Skip to main content

Chargers preview

I just watched part of the Monday night game, and Minnesota...how can I put this. Look, I love the Broncos to death, but did you ever think those side stripes would become a fashion trend?

Anyway, today's team: the San Diego Chargers.

Last year: 9-7, third in the AFC West

What changed? The Chargers allowed quarterback Drew Brees, coming off a shoulder injury and consecutive productive seasons, to leave in free agency. His replacement is Philip Rivers, a third-year man who's thrown just thirty passes in his NFL career.

The pressure's on Rivers, obviously, to show he's worth the gamble. Brees was rarely spectacular, but he's consistent, accurate, and has a veteran's knack for avoiding bad plays. Actually, that's a silly thing to say-veteran NFL quarterbacks include guys like Jake Plummer, Brett Favre, and Aaron Brooks, who make mistakes like kids make Nikes.

Brees played well enough to give the Chargers a chance in just about every game. The team probably looked at Brees and thought he played just well enough to lose in big games. But since they've kept Marty Schottenheimer this long, you'd think that fit in great with the organization's overall strategy.

Anyway, Rivers is a fantastic prospect. I rated him the number two quarterback in his draft class, behind Ben Roethlisberger but certainly ahead of Eli Manning. He's more pocket passer than scrambler, but he's got enough arm to add a vertical dimension to the offensive attack. He does throw a little sidearm, but Rivers could chuck it underhand and still have a higher release point than Brees.

On offense, everyone loves LaDainian Tomlinson, the best back in the league for years now. If you're playing fantasy football, you're a dork. Also, you know the kind of damage Tomlinson can do to even the best defenses. Tomlinson will have a fantastic year even if Rivers sucks, but will that translate into wins?

The Chargers were one of three AFC West teams in the top ten in offensive yardage last year (everyone but Oakland, of course). But they were sixth in pass efficiency, a number that will surely drop. I think the Chargers will be middle-of-the-pack offensively this year.

Defense: San Diego led the league in defense against the run last year by yardage, but were 28th against the pass. This year, they're very young along the defensive line and at cornerback, so while they could improve, I think they'll give up some big games as well. With Schottenheimer at the helm, San Diego will be conservative and the defense will seem respectable enough, but don't be misled: this is a question mark.

Outlook: With the uncertainty at quarterback and on defense, the Chargers have taken a step backwards. Yes, this team has exceeded expectations the last few seasons, but Brees provided a lot of that grit. I think San Diego will compete with Oakland for the division cellar.

Comments

David said…
you know it's odd, i never ever get tired of beating a schottenheimer team. he's such a loser... him, dan reeves and gary barnett need to get together and massage each other's butt's about conservative game play whilst keeping your job
Mike said…
NOT a pretty picture...but how true it is.

I didn't get this on the hiring side, because it's not like Schottenheimer doesn't have a clear track record...but all those guys will keep you competitive and keep the real trophies at arm's length. (My apologies to Lamar Hunt, of course.)

Maybe they (meaning teams) would just rather not lose big than win. Buncha sissies.
Mike said…
I forgot to mention, amen on beating Schottenheimer. That really never does get old.

Yeah, I'm not sure cutting Brees was such a bad move, either-if I had to guess, I'd say Rivers ends up being a better pro (which is sort of saying something at this point). Besides, the Chargers weren't getting any better.
David said…
you need to do a story on bvp complaining about losing the second slot to cutler...
Mike said…
Are you crazy? If I ignore him, he might go away...

Popular posts from this blog

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...