Skip to main content

Finals preview? Not yet

Tonight's NBA Finals Game One (6 pm Mountain, ABC) promises to be an exciting matchup of-

I'm sorry.

It turns out the Finals don't start until Thursday. I can see why the NBA would want to delay the series and maximize potential weekend games. However, the only weekend contests will be Games 2 and probably 5, which land on Sundays. There aren't even any Friday night games. So that's not it.

Instead of building on their momentum and leaping headfirst into an intriguing Finals, the NBA bizarrely elected to cede control of the airwaves to Albert Pujols' injury.

And instead of trying to predict what will happen four days from now when I don't even know what I'm doing for lunch in forty-five minutes, I just want to talk about the closeout games.

East Finals: The Heat cruised to a surprisingly easy 95-78 win over the Pistons. Every time the Pistons went on a run in the second half, the Heat matched it with scoring of their own.

Friday's game showed how awesome Miami can be when the supporting cast is hitting shots. Jason Williams got off to an obscene 10-for-10 start before missing his last two shots (loser), and James Posey grabbed eleven boards. That easily made up for a just-okay night by Dwyane Wade, who was suffering from the flu.(Is it okay with everyone if I call it the flu and not flu or flu-like symptoms, even though I'm not his doctor?)

I was impressed with how thoroughly Miami outplayed Detroit. Basically none of the Pistons played well-even Richard Hamilton, who scored 33, was noticeably less efficient than usual.

I wonder how we'll think about the Pistons ten years from now, or if we'll be thinking at all. By that I mean: will anyone look at them critically?

What am I trying to say here...look at the Packers of the late nineties. They won Super Bowl XXXI, then lost the next year to the Broncos, and lost in the first round the next season to Terrell Owens' famous touchdown grab.

Yet we still revere Brett Favre as one of the game's greatest quarterbacks (and rightfully so), and think of those Packers as a more dangerous team than they probably were.

Last week I said one title in the NFL means more than it does in the NBA, or at least it should. I still stand by that, I just don't know if other people recognize it. If the Pistons' run is over, they accomplished more than a lot of other teams ever will-but they also fell far short of historic greatness.

Let's not forget how the Pistons managed to end up a mere footnote to that players-in-the-stands brawl with the Pacers a few years ago. That might have been their most impressive feat yet.

West Finals: The Mavericks played some defense in mounting a nice comeback to finish off the Suns. At least I think so. I have to take the Associated Press' word for it, because I could not have found that series any less appealing and didn't watch it.

Tall goofy white guy with bad hair versus short goofy white guy with bad hair...you know, it's really shocking those two bonded back when they were on the same team.

I am glad I won't be watching the Suns anymore. No, nothing about dunks offends me. It's their coach. I've noticed in the playoffs that Mike D'Antoni likes to wear a tie in his team's colors. Does he always do that?

Is this high school? I think it's pretty weak but sort of understandable when college coaches sport team colors during March Madness, for example, but for an NBA coach to try to match his team's uniform is miles past your ordinary brand of lame.

Comments

Mike said…
Great post! I couldn't agree more!
Mike said…
I still can't get over that Illinois-North Carolina championship game. Bruce Weber's jacket was amazing.

As for the Pack, perhaps another relevant example would be the late-90's Cowboys-still regarded as a tough team for some reason, yet they'd lose playoff games to the likes of Jake Plummer. (Perhaps this does not bode well for the La-li-lu-le-lo of New England.)
Mike said…
Amen, son. Especially since the Rams were supposed to loaded for years to come with young talent like Torry Holt, Dre Bly, and Az-Zahir Hakim. (I'm serious, people thought that.) And the Pistons had a championship core plus Darko. Excellent example. And some of the core guys had reputations as players that really benefited from being on a good team (Kurt Warner anyone?), not unlike Detroit today.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...