Skip to main content

Nuggets back in action!

All right, I've lived off the non-glory of the Broncos' loss long enough, it's time to update this website and move on to the Nuggets.

We/I at Hole Punch move on with a heavy heart, because it feels like the Finals ended about a month ago, and sometimes it seems like the NBA is all I ever talk about here. (And in the middle of football season!)

Anyway, the Denver Nuggets open their season tonight in San Antonio (8 p.m. Eastern on TNT) against the defending champion Spurs, which is to say, we're looking at starting the season off at 0-1, especially with coach George Karl out for the first two games.

The question this year is, what will the carryover be for the George Karl effect? Returning primarily the same roster that finished last season with a flourish, the Nuggets look to build on the momentum and contend in the West this year.

A few key points, and a bunch of questions:

Strengths: The Nuggets are strong in the same areas they've been for the last two playoff seasons: namely, unusual frontcourt depth and the ability, when the spirit moves them, to run anyone out of the building.

Marcus Camby and Kenyon Martin anchor a solid-rebounding and plus-defensive effort, and off the bench Nene nee Hilario is one of the league's best big-man reserves. And you might have heard of the other forward, Carmelo Anthony.

An already-potent point guard corps of Andre Miller and the Earl of Boykins was strengthened with the somewhat-curious addition of the Earl of Watson, late of the Memphis Grizzlies. At least it looks curious, considering Miller is a solid starter and Boykins is worthy off big minutes in reserve.

But late last season, Karl often played Miller and Boykins together to spark the offense. The acquisition of Watson is a good sign the Nuggets plan to play two point guards often this season and shows a commitment to the up-tempo game.

Weaknesses: The most glaring weakness last season was the complete lack of outside shooting following the loss of Voshon Lenard to a torn Achilles tendon. Indeed, you could say outside shooting was our Achilles' heel last year, but that's just lame. Anyway, the late-season pickup of Wesley Person mitigated that loss somewhat.

Lenard returns to the lineup this year (Person is gone), but will remain one of the last options in the offense. Will he be remembered in the half-court?

The Nuggets can put up points in bunches when they run, but when games slow down, they occasionally have a tough time scoring. But they'll be better this year than last, thanks to the return of Lenard and the continued development of Carmelo Anthony.

The other question (and it may seem odd given the Nuggets' aforementioned frontcourt depth): can the Nuggets rebound effectively against elite teams? The Spurs beat on us the boards by about five per game in last year's playoff series. And defensive rebounding is the key to a running offense.

Carmelo: Can Carmelo start the season with a bang, or will he play his way into shape like he has the past two seasons? Word on the street is that Anthony is ready to rumble this time around; but I recall hearing that last year, too.

Carmelo remains the key for the franchise, which is unsurprising considering how little the roster has changed. He's a fantastic finisher on the break as well as our best low-post and midrange offensive option. Will he continue to give an honest effort defensively? Can he be counted on in clutch situations? Has his jumper improved any? And will he continue to develop into a tougher rebounder, without jeopardizing his open court opportunities?

I think Carmelo will have a fantastic season and score in the mid-twenties per game, in addition to regaining his rookie year late-game mojo. He won't be a stopper defensively, nor will we ask him to be, but expect him to play hard enough to earn big minutes.

The Division: As I mentioned in an earlier post, Sports Illustrated predicts the Nuggets to finish with the No. 2 seed in the West and a division crown. While that seeding looks really high to a longtime Nuggets fan such as myself, the division win is very realistic-which would make us top three in any event.

Our competition in the Northwest is Portland, Minnesota, Utah, and Seattle. Seattle's good, Utah's dangerous when healthy, and I think Minnesota could bounce back from last season, if they can get any kind of decent point guard play out of Troy Hudson and Marko Jaric (okay, maybe I don't think they can bounce back).

In other words, we're in a sort-of deep division, but we ought to win it anyway (not unlike the Broncos in the AFC West).

The Coach: George Karl turned last season around; can he keep it rolling? He demands a lot from his players, which usually ends in them tuning him out for an underachieving finish to his tenure, but he's still early in his stay here. While I didn't think he was much of a pickup back in the day, he proved to be more than worth it. There are better coaches in the league (Phil Jackson, Larry Brown, and Gregg Popovich are all definitely a cut above), but he's as good as anyone in the division (I can't stand Jerry Sloan.)

The Outlook: To my own surprise and after a little research, I pretty much have to go with Sports Illustrated here. Barring major injury, the Nuggets will win the division. I'll say 54-28, and wouldn't that be great! I don't know what seed that will give us, but who really cares?

What do you think?

Comments

David said…
just on sheer supposition that "what can go wrong will."

camby, an injury torn vet.
kenyon, a fiery fiend
mello, the third year embryotic ego

one of them gets hurt seriously this year. I say we finish fourth in the conference.

i just want to be wrong, so the nugs can have a great season. one of the best teams to watch, and the best damn uniform color scheme in the bigs.
Mike said…
Yeah, who knows how we'll fare come playoff time? Assuming playoff time comes, which it surely should, but I can't take anything for granted with the Nuggets yet.

And Pugs is right, a million things can go wrong. Which I guess is why No. 2 sounded so high to me. But with Amare hurt, Dallas and Sacramento being exactly the same as always, and Houston's odd mix of Yao and T-Mac, all the other non-Spurs West contenders have big question marks this year, too.
David said…
brothers gore,

i guess the mile high sports enthusiast that I am... finds it more soothing to prepare as if bad things only happen to my team.

that when, when they do, i knew it was coming. and when it happens to other teams i rejoice

schauden freude
David said…
i was right.

down goes nene...

although i always question his real value to the team. we should've traded him when we had the chance.

what i wouldn't do for a danny schayes these days
Mike said…
I knew I'd overrated them, man.

I am glad to see Pugs shares my love for the Nugs' unis.

I am definitely a pessimist (as if all o' y'all hadn't noticed).

Forget Danny. I'd take Dolph Schayes at this point.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...