Skip to main content

Dream the dreams of other men; you’ll be no one’s rival

Yesterday I caught an early rivalry game: the Texas-Oklahoma showdown at the Cotton Bowl. Texas beat the Sooners 16-13 in a close but not great game.

The Sooners were very competitive though they were clearly a little overmatched this year. Sam Bradford went down on another routine tackle and left the game with a reinjured shoulder. I had to wonder yesterday whether the Heisman winner’s best days are already behind him. Landry Jones is doing well considering the circumstances, which should not be confused with doing well, at least compared to OU’s preseason expectations.

As for Texas, I was a little impressed with Colt McCoy’s mobility, and their run game looked very good in spurts, but the defense is clearly their bread and butter. Their D reminds me of other great teams, as Oklahoma has been in the past, with monstrous, athletic defenders who appear somehow bigger than their NFL counterparts.

I don’t count it against the Longhorns that this game was so close; that’s just how rivalries are sometimes. In fact, in this season of upsets, they're one of the few teams with a true shot at the national championship.

* * *

A couple weeks ago I discussed with a friend a topic I’d like to open to everyone: what college teams can a person root for? Do you need a tie to a school and, if so, what suffices?

We were talking about the 2006 Rose Bowl, and I mentioned that among the reasons I was rooting for Texas was that my brother had attended law school there. My friend, a fellow CU alum, cut me off and said that was not a sufficient reason. He further said that he was rooting for Texas because they’re a Big XII school, which is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard.

Perhaps because I followed the NFL first, I’ve never much cared for the conference ties that dominate so many college football conversations. Is the Pac-10 better than the Big XII this year? Who cares? I happen to make sweeping generalizations about conferences all the time (the Pac-10 is soft; the Big Eleven is boring), but I see no reason to root for teams I spent all year rooting against. I would never pull for the Chiefs in the playoffs just to bring honor to the AFC West. (Perhaps my friend is just doing the best he can considering Division I football’s absurd “championship” “system”, where it really does matter what people think of your conferencemates.)

College basketball’s a stretch for me, a fan of the North Carolina Tar Heels. I started pulling for the Tar Heels in 1998, mostly because MJ went there and they had an absolutely stacked team. (They didn’t win the title that year. In fact, they choked rather dramatically, so I don’t feel guilty about this at all.) I’ve visited the campus and even requested an application there, which I was too lazy to fill out. I know that doesn’t sound like much, but I honestly considered attending school in Chapel Hill. Growing up in Colorado, who else was I going to root for? I did support the Chauncey Billups Buffs, of course, but the whole point of college hoops is March Madness, so you need a good team.

On the other hand, I grew up rooting for BYU football because my parents went there. I was pretty sure I’d go there, too, though as a little kid I had no real idea. But I was a lifelong fan, so it’s not like my fandom was any less pure than anyone else’s. If I’d been a lifelong fan of UNC, would that have been any less legit just because my parents didn't go there? Come to think of it, BYU was only a few years removed from its championship season when I became a fan; I just realized I might have been a front-runner there, too.

CU football I remember liking in a general sense, though not nearly the way I liked BYU. They might’ve been my second-favorite team, but it was kind of a distant second. Our ties to the school were living in Colorado and the fact that my mom occasionally took us up to Boulder to play on Folsom Field, which is even more awesome in retrospect. I definitely watched some Orange Bowls as a kid. I can remember our family staying up together to watch the win (over Notre Dame; how cool is that?) that gave the Buffs the national championship. At the time it was cool, but not Super Bowl XXXII cool. Eventually my brother and I attended CU together, and if they ever win another championship I’m going to lose my freaking mind. Amidst the scandals of the Barnett era the team became a bit of a punchline, but I find myself liking the Buffs more and more as life goes on, for obvious reasons. They’re my one team now, if I can only have one, but it’s amazing to me how long it took me to get there. For some reason, though, the rivalry with Nebraska meant a lot to me for years before the team in general did. That game was appointment viewing long before I ever attended class in Boulder.

I also rooted for Miami football in the early part of this decade for reasons far too embarrassing to discuss publicly. But with Miami, UNC, and perhaps young CU, I think I’ve had the right idea: if you’re going to root for a college team you have no natural reason to like, you might as well sell out and pull for a powerhouse. Contrast this with a friend of mine who moved to North Carolina a few years ago and started promoting what he saw as a rising N.C. State program. He talked quite a bit of trash to me as a UNC fan, which I found patently hilarious, because big-money college sports have all the upward mobility of Major League Baseball. Last season, after the Tar Heels won it all, he claimed to have lost all interest in the sport. N.C. State has a proud history with two national titles, and they gave the Nuggets the fantastic Skywalker Thompson, whose awesome lightsaber-holding likeness adorned the walls of the old Denver ESPN Zone, but come on. College sports are all about the haves.

* * *

The Red River Rivalry was just an appetizer for CU’s win over No. 15 Kansas last night. What can I say, I love watching Tyler Hansen. He’s got a good arm, but those feet! Unlike some young quarterbacks with quickness, his first instinct isn't to run, but to buy time and keep plays alive long after the plug has been pulled. Twice after he purchased some clock his receivers dropped good passes, and I’m convinced they’d just become mesmerized watching him dance behind the scrimmage line. Tight end Riar Geer was able to keep his focus long enough to catch a pass after another great scramble on Colorado’s fourth-quarter go-ahead drive. Hopefully that's a sign of the future. Adjustments will need to be made, but I think receivers will love playing with Hansen.

Kansas, other than their end-of-half sequences, didn’t look that great, and I’m a little surprised they were No. 15 to begin with, though they were undefeated.

CU’s next game is Saturday morning at Kansas State.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...