Skip to main content

What I've missed

1. Whenever I've walked through the mall the last few months, I've always stopped and pondered the "Tulowitzki" No. 2 Rockies jersey at one of the kiosks. Was that an actual player, or just an example of a personalized jersey?

Turns out that's Troy Tulowitzki, the 22-year-old shortstop who's hit 24 homers and knocked in 98 runs this season. And I had no idea who he was. In other words, no, I haven't followed the Rockies this year.

It wasn't always this way. I don't know how many Rockies games I watched in the late '90s, but it was a ton. I followed some pretty horrible teams like crazy.

But a few years ago it became pretty clear to me that the Rockies weren't really trying to win anymore. Management had milked the initial excitement dry, and wasn't interested in risking the money to make the team relevant again. When the team traded Larry Walker in 2004--in other words, when my favorite team got rid of my favorite player--I was actually glad, because he'd have a chance to win before he retired. (Did Bruins fans feel the same way about Ray Borque?)

And whenever anyone tried to get me excited about the Rockies' late-season run the last couple weeks, I just felt like I knew they wouldn't make it. They made it, all right, by forcing a one-game playoff for the playoffs tomorrow night against San Diego. I'm watching that for sure, and probably their whole playoff run. (For discussion below: Are my actions at all excusible, or am I the worst kind of fair-weather fan?)

The Rockies have an 89-73 record, tied for second-best in the National League. They've outscored their opponents this year by a League-best 101 runs. (A few teams in the AL have done better, though.) It sucks that baseball's playoffs so often come down to who's able to line up their pitching, but all things being equal, if the Rockies win tomorrow they're legit World Series contenders.

2. I was travelling Saturday and missed the entire Colorado-Oklahoma game. Obviously, I really wish I would've seen it.

What I wish I'd missed

1. The Broncos' game today against the Colts. Actually, I did skip most of this one. I hate the friggin' Colts, who picked up 226 yards on the ground. (I'm sensing a theme this season.) Actually, many of the stats were pretty even for both teams, except for Cutler v. Manning, which went about as you'd expect. I'm not sure what to do about that.

Comments

John said…
I haven't followed the Rockies, either, largely on the same theory . . . so I don't think you are the worst kind of fair-weather fan. Just last week they were only 1.5 out of the wild card, but there were two other teams ahead of them, so I never thought this would happen. Man, I hope they pull it out.

(Note: I think that's exactly how Bruins fans felt about Ray Bourque - Boston even threw him a parade after the Avs won the Stanley Cup.)

The CU game was incredible. I was worried because Oklahoma kept giving us chances down the stretch, and we weren't capitalizing. But overall it's a big win for Dan Hawkins.

The Broncos aren't looking too sharp right now . . . every year we beat the teams we are supposed to be and lose to the teams we are supposed to lose to. I'd like to see us be competitive once in awhile, but I don't know if we have the quarterback play for it.
blaine said…
I agree with John on the CU game, I was really worried at the end, after the missed the earlier field goal I thought they should've tried to get a few yards closer before the atempt instead of running draw plays up the middle, but Eberhart came through in the end. I think this win will mark the beginning of a new winning era for Hawkins and the Buffs.

I couldn't be more excited for the Rockies, I've followed them since they became a team. What do you think the chances are of keeping Holliday? I wish he didn't have such a good agent. I'm afraid the Monforts won't be willing to shell out what Scott Boras will be asking for. What are your thoughts on the matter?
Mike said…
I have no idea what the Rockies are planning to do with Holliday, other than that a deep postseason run would make a huge difference to everyone. If the Rockies lose tonight, I think most of Denver would go back to ignoring the team...but if they, say, make it to a seven-game NLCS, it could really reignite Rockies fervor in the city and put a lot of pressure on ownership to bring the team back. Otherwise, my instincts say he walks, but I haven't followed the negotiations closely.

Scott Boras is a "tough" agent to deal with, which is to say he likes money, but I'm realizing right now how much I hate it when the agent is blamed for a player leaving. (Not that you were saying that, Blaine, but it happens all the time in baseball, or with Drew Rosenhaus in football.) If Holliday wants to stay in Denver, he'll certainly have that option, though he may not feel the price is fair. But it's not like Boras will force himt o leave town. I think most players hire Boras because they want the maximum possible money, though, which makes me worry about how badly Holliday wants to stay.
blaine said…
Mike,

I like what you said regarding the agent taking the blame for the player leaving and I think it's a good point. Considering how much Boras has been able to get A-Rod I imagine the negotiations will be over 100 million and even if the Rockies win tonight I'm not sure I can see the Monforts paying one player that kind of money. Although, if it came down to it, I would rather see the Rockies make a strong effort to keep Helton, Hawpe, and Tulo even if it meant they would lose Holliday.
David said…
the broncos.
there are some good things going on, but more bad.

henry looks good, everything else = bad.

i'm calling this season a wash.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...