Skip to main content

To tape or not to tape?

Today I had church for three hours starting at 10 a.m. The Denver Broncos had their season opener starting at 11 a.m., and NFL games generally run around three hours. Since I went to church, I was sure to miss much of the game.

Thanks to the wonders of modern technology (TiVo, Media Center PCs or, in my case, the videocassette recorder), though, I didn't have to miss a single play. For years now, fans have been able to come home, watch the game from the start and, depending on their timing, maybe even catch up with the live broadcast. (In my case, I could wait until I was certain the game was over, rewind, and then enjoy, cursing myself only when I realized the tape cuts out with 15 seconds left.)

Anyway, various influences sought to keep me at the church past the conclusion of the meetings. And everyone who tried to keep me there thought it was okay to delay me...after all, I was TiVo-ing the game, wasn't I?

Absolutely not. I never have and, I pray, I never will record a game so I can watch it after it's over. I don't understand how some fans can live with the suspense. I can't. I love the Broncos so much that just knowing that they're safe is more important to me than getting to watch the whole game for my own selfish reasons.

Besides, today's game ended in spectacular fashion, with the team unable to stop the clock and Jason Elam running out and nailing the game-winner. So what do I do if my phone rings seconds after the finish? If I'm taping the game, do I just let it go to voice mail and hope no one ruins it for me? And then do I shut off the phone so I get no texts? Just seal myself off from the world? How is living in ignorance worth that effort, especially when the facts in the case are already settled?

I love the Broncos and have to know immediately if they've won or lost. Personally I feel like I already showed admirable restraint today in never retreating to my car radio and in Googling the score only twice.

What about you guys? Can any of you stand to watch a game and feel the pretend tension after it's already decided?

Comments

John said…
I'm with you. I DVR'ed the Texas-TCU game on Saturday night because I was in Baltimore at the Orioles-Red Sox game . . . but when I got home, I immediately had to ask Kristina how the game had turned out . . . and, after hearing Texas had won, I fast forwarded through the recording just to make sure.

Now that I live in a world where I get few Broncos games, I swear at the in-studio crews for talking about any other games at halftime or during the post-game.

I guess the easy solution is just not to go to church whenever it conflicts with a Broncos game.
Anonymous said…
Get a tivo. It will change your life.
Mike said…
Yup. It'll turn me into one of those people who's always telling his friends to get a TiVo.
David said…
yeah, and then you'll realize what you've been missing.

it really is nice to be able to pause the game, instead of turning down the volume. then you get to fast forward through commercials.

tivo isn't just for when you'll miss the entire game, but for when you'll miss the first half. it's really brilliant technology.

i personally don't have the restraint to not find out the score. if they won, i'll watch it. if they lost, i burn the tv, the tivo, and any other effigies that remind me of the opposing team.
Anonymous said…
It seems like your headline could be re-interpreted in light of the Patriots taping the Jets incident this week. Any comment from Hole Punch?

DG
David said…
i second that.

belichek is not just the worst dressing coach in the nfl, he's now the most deceitful..

Popular posts from this blog

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...