Skip to main content

Whipping

Well, that game pretty much sucked. What can I say? I thought Ohio State was better than that.

(An aside, before we get started here: I don't play fantasy sports, but I had a sort of fantasy-like dilemma tonight. Basically, I had Ohio State winning it all, and I was pulling for Ohio State, but if Florida won, I was actually going to win or tie for the win in both of my bracket groups. So who do I pull for? It was easy: I still went for Ohio State. And I don't even really like the Buckeyes for any reason. So I will never get people who like it when some NFL star torches their favorite team. Just absurd. (Plus it turned out my math was off and I might have lost anyway.))

Anyway, since the game was so lame, I just thought I'd share a few thoughts on some of the most famous players. And they are:

Joakim Noah: Could Noah have been any less impressive on the college game's biggest stage? He was plagued by foul trouble throughout, and he wasn't even aggressive when he was on the floor. Turned out Florida didn't need him, but it was surprising for a guy who plays so much on emotion.

Al Horford: I'd heard rumors this year that Horford was superior to his frontcourt running mate, and saw nothing tonight that would make me challenge that opinion. To be fair, I don't watch Florida much, but he was sweet. 18 points and 12 rebounds are plenty. Of course, Florida has so many widebodies up front that I probably confused half of his nicest plays with those of backup Chris Richard, who stepped up when Noah was out.

Mike Conley, Jr.: Conley finished with 20 points, six assists, and four steals, so it was a fine statistical night. But because he and his teammates got off to such a slow start, he had less of an impact than you'd think from just reading a box score. I don't know if you heard, but Billy Packer mentioned once or seven times that Conley plays low and can really challenge an opponent's dribble. He also braces himself a good minute before someone sets a pick on him. Thus, Florida neutralized his defense with screens whenever they needed to in the halfcourt.

Greg Oden: His performance wasn't quite as legendary as Jim Nantz and Packer were making it sound, but he played his guts out. 25 points, 12 rebounds, four blocks. Most of the time I've seen Oden this year, he's sort of blended in with his team, making some nice plays and disappearing for stretches. That was not the case tonight-he stood out the whole evening. While his defense was fantastic, I was most impressed with his offensive repertoire. He was not only bigger than Florida's inside players, he was quicker around the basket. I can't wait to see him in the pros, where he'll have some shooters that can spread the floor behind a deeper three-point line. I just hope he's not the next Patrick Ewing, which I guess is a pretty harsh standard to hold a freshman to.

Comments

David said…
oden needs to bulk up a lot to become a scorer... in my opinion.

else i see him becoming like a camby. adroit defenseman & rebounder, nominal scoring ability.

i don't think any of the florida guys are going to do anything in the pros. they are a good team, a very good team, but i don't think any of them are stars per se.
John said…
I guess we'll soon be able to test your hypothesis re: the Florida players. I don't know if any of them are stars, but I think three of the four (minus Green) can become decent role players, especially Horford. But, that said, I wouldn't mind if the Nuggets grabbed Green, who may even fall to the second round.
David said…
how 'bout some masters coverage up in here?

j/k
Mike said…
Well, I would say Oden seems bigger already than Camby, and of course he's 18, so he should fill out no problem.

I sort of agree with both of you on Florida's lineup-they could all be solid pro players in certain roles, but I don't think any will be stars. Of course, one of them could fall in the draft to like the Spurs or something and do real well in the right system.

Masters, eh?

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...