Skip to main content

Al Wilson gone (?)

Well, that sucks.

While I don't like trusting "sources", apparently Al Wilson will be released by the Denver Broncos very soon. (I don't want to trust ESPN's source, that is-mine was Pugs.)

The Broncos tried trading Wilson to the Giants a few weeks back. I didn't want to say anything about it until the trade was official. By the time I learned it was, it wasn't-Wilson had already failed his physical. I guess the Broncos just decided to cut the middleman and Wilson in one fell swoop.

I don't get it. Wilson suffered a scary injury against Seattle in week 13 last season, but returned for the next three games. (He missed the last game against San Francisco with a sore back.) Like everyone, he's getting older. But even if he's not a superstar now, he's worth having on the roster-especially this roster, which doesn't have any worthy replacements on it. (Wilson outlasted his one-time successor, Terry Pierce, by a year.)

More to the point, Wilson's been an absolute rock in the middle of the defense for years. It was 1999 when Wilson was drafted and started stealing local headlines with his play in goal-line drills. Crazy how things turned out. I thought the Broncos were reloading with picks like Wilson following back-to-back Super Bowl wins. Instead, they were hit and miss over the next few years. Wilson indeed became a worthy member of the franchise's proud linebacker history, but the team only won one playoff game in his years here. Instead, he made play after gutsy play for a series of borderline playoff teams. It's also worth noting that Wilson missed only three games in eight seasons.

(I also remember one reader telling me after the draft that Wilson was too short to succeed-just want you to know that I remembered.)

Recently, his rough-and-tumble game has been the perfect complement to the outside speed of Ian Gold and D.J. Williams. Oh, and he takes the entire defense out to dinner every week. I wish I knew the real reason why the team is so anxious to get rid of him. John Clayton suggests it's a salary cap move:
With a $5.2 million salary and a $600,000 roster bonus, Wilson didn't fit into the Broncos salary cap after a busy offseason. His release will save the Broncos $1.63 million.

That's ridiculous. I don't even know how the Broncos are that close to the spending limit, considering how much the cap increased this offseason. Maybe it's because they gave a backup tight end $30 million? I like Daniel Graham, and I hope he lives up to his potential, but come on-Wilson already has.

One last thought: two years before taking Wilson at the bottom of the first round, the Broncos took Trevor Pryce with their No. 1 selection. Pryce was cut before last season. The Broncos blamed the cap, which made about as much sense then as it does now. Pryce joined the Baltimore Ravens and racked up 13 sacks last year. Dr. Z of Sports Illustrated even named Pryce to his All-Pro team. Does the same fate await Wilson? As long as he doesn't join the Raiders, I can only hope it does.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The Raider picked up Romo when we were finished with him, why not Wilson, this would be a good time to start building a team with Jamarcus and Wilson still has a lot of talent
John said…
A sad day for the Broncos . . . Wilson has been a stalwart member of the team, and I can't believe we are cutting him so we could outbid the Seahawks for Daniel Graham's services. Now our defense is really screwed.
David said…
character matters.

when will they realize that.

he was a real leader, you can't put a price on that.

however, it is curious to note that he couldn't pass a physical. makes me wonder if he really is damaged goods.

still, he deserves a shot here before being forced to move on.
John said…
Amen, Pugs, especially if all we save by cutting him is $1.63 mill . . . chump change by today's NFL standards.
Anonymous said…
That $1.63 will get us a sweet special teamer or 4th or 5th round rookie--what do we need the pride of our Defense for?

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...